Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks

The present study aims to investigate the behavioral outcomes and the antecedent brain dynamics during the preparation of tasks in which the discrimination is either about the choice (choice response task; CRT) or the action (Go/No-go), and in a task not requiring discrimination (simple response tas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marika Berchicci, Valentina Bianco, Hadiseh Hamidi, Linda Fiorini, Francesco Di Russo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/3/455
_version_ 1797613087573934080
author Marika Berchicci
Valentina Bianco
Hadiseh Hamidi
Linda Fiorini
Francesco Di Russo
author_facet Marika Berchicci
Valentina Bianco
Hadiseh Hamidi
Linda Fiorini
Francesco Di Russo
author_sort Marika Berchicci
collection DOAJ
description The present study aims to investigate the behavioral outcomes and the antecedent brain dynamics during the preparation of tasks in which the discrimination is either about the choice (choice response task; CRT) or the action (Go/No-go), and in a task not requiring discrimination (simple response task; SRT). Using event-related potentials (ERPs), the mean amplitude over prefrontal, central, and parietal-occipital sites was analyzed in 20 young healthy participants in a time frame before stimulus presentation to assess cognitive, motor, and visual readiness, respectively. Behaviorally, participants were faster and more accurate in the SRT than in the CRT and the Go/No-go. At the electrophysiological level, the proactive cognitive and motor ERP components were larger in the CRT and the Go/No-go than the SRT, but the largest amplitude emerged in the Go/No-go. Further, the amplitude over parieto-occipital leads was enhanced in the SRT. The strongest intensity of the frontal negative expectancy wave over prefrontal leads in the Go/No-go task could be attributed to the largest uncertainty about the target presentation and subsequent motor response selection and execution. The enhanced sensory readiness in the SRT can be related to either an increased visual readiness associated with task requirements or a reduced overlap with proactive processing on the scalp.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:51:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7a99099acb245fabad9d84c5f336153
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:51:01Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d7a99099acb245fabad9d84c5f3361532023-11-17T10:00:04ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252023-03-0113345510.3390/brainsci13030455Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition TasksMarika Berchicci0Valentina Bianco1Hadiseh Hamidi2Linda Fiorini3Francesco Di Russo4Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Exercise and Health, University of Paderborn, 33098 Paderborn, GermanyDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, ItalyThe present study aims to investigate the behavioral outcomes and the antecedent brain dynamics during the preparation of tasks in which the discrimination is either about the choice (choice response task; CRT) or the action (Go/No-go), and in a task not requiring discrimination (simple response task; SRT). Using event-related potentials (ERPs), the mean amplitude over prefrontal, central, and parietal-occipital sites was analyzed in 20 young healthy participants in a time frame before stimulus presentation to assess cognitive, motor, and visual readiness, respectively. Behaviorally, participants were faster and more accurate in the SRT than in the CRT and the Go/No-go. At the electrophysiological level, the proactive cognitive and motor ERP components were larger in the CRT and the Go/No-go than the SRT, but the largest amplitude emerged in the Go/No-go. Further, the amplitude over parieto-occipital leads was enhanced in the SRT. The strongest intensity of the frontal negative expectancy wave over prefrontal leads in the Go/No-go task could be attributed to the largest uncertainty about the target presentation and subsequent motor response selection and execution. The enhanced sensory readiness in the SRT can be related to either an increased visual readiness associated with task requirements or a reduced overlap with proactive processing on the scalp.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/3/455ERPsS-R mappingmotor readinessvisual activityproactive control
spellingShingle Marika Berchicci
Valentina Bianco
Hadiseh Hamidi
Linda Fiorini
Francesco Di Russo
Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks
Brain Sciences
ERPs
S-R mapping
motor readiness
visual activity
proactive control
title Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks
title_full Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks
title_fullStr Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks
title_short Electrophysiological Correlates of Different Proactive Controls during Response Competition and Inhibition Tasks
title_sort electrophysiological correlates of different proactive controls during response competition and inhibition tasks
topic ERPs
S-R mapping
motor readiness
visual activity
proactive control
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/3/455
work_keys_str_mv AT marikaberchicci electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofdifferentproactivecontrolsduringresponsecompetitionandinhibitiontasks
AT valentinabianco electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofdifferentproactivecontrolsduringresponsecompetitionandinhibitiontasks
AT hadisehhamidi electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofdifferentproactivecontrolsduringresponsecompetitionandinhibitiontasks
AT lindafiorini electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofdifferentproactivecontrolsduringresponsecompetitionandinhibitiontasks
AT francescodirusso electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofdifferentproactivecontrolsduringresponsecompetitionandinhibitiontasks