Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?

Orientation: It is rational for investors to expect additional compensation for an increased risk exposure. This positive risk–return relationship is in line with traditional financial theory; however, this relationship does not always hold in empirical research. Research purpose: The aim of this a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johannes P. Steyn, Lomari Theart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/448
_version_ 1818336441637273600
author Johannes P. Steyn
Lomari Theart
author_facet Johannes P. Steyn
Lomari Theart
author_sort Johannes P. Steyn
collection DOAJ
description Orientation: It is rational for investors to expect additional compensation for an increased risk exposure. This positive risk–return relationship is in line with traditional financial theory; however, this relationship does not always hold in empirical research. Research purpose: The aim of this article was to investigate the prevalence of the low-risk anomaly in the South African equity market. Motivation for the study: If there is evidence of a low-risk anomaly, where low-risk shares outperform high-risk shares, then the additional return expectation of investors may be misplaced. Research design/approach and method: A unique sampling procedure and an extended time frame were employed in a quintile portfolio analysis methodology. Main findings: The article presents evidence that South African listed shares with low historical volatility earned higher risk-adjusted returns over the period July 2004 to September 2018. Low-volatility shares delivered a Sharpe ratio of 1.10 compared to 0.65 produced by the Financial Times Stock Exchange / Johannesburg Stock Exchange Shareholder Weighted Index over the same period. Practical/managerial implications: The assumption that return in an investment portfolio could be enhanced by taking on more risk could be wrong. It seems that fund managers could potentially enhance returns and decrease risk in their portfolios by focussing on shares with low historical volatility. Contribution/value-add: The negative relationship observed between volatility and return is inconsistent with theoretical expectations. Therefore, the results of this article suggest that investors are not rewarded for assuming higher levels of risk.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:39:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7af0bbb5bea45eca9db8d554d077a76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1995-7076
2312-2803
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:39:22Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d7af0bbb5bea45eca9db8d554d077a762022-12-21T23:41:39ZengAOSISJournal of Economic and Financial Sciences1995-70762312-28032019-09-01121e1e1010.4102/jef.v12i1.448373Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?Johannes P. Steyn0Lomari Theart1Department of Business Management, Stellenbosch University, Cape TownDepartment of Business Management, Stellenbosch University, Cape TownOrientation: It is rational for investors to expect additional compensation for an increased risk exposure. This positive risk–return relationship is in line with traditional financial theory; however, this relationship does not always hold in empirical research. Research purpose: The aim of this article was to investigate the prevalence of the low-risk anomaly in the South African equity market. Motivation for the study: If there is evidence of a low-risk anomaly, where low-risk shares outperform high-risk shares, then the additional return expectation of investors may be misplaced. Research design/approach and method: A unique sampling procedure and an extended time frame were employed in a quintile portfolio analysis methodology. Main findings: The article presents evidence that South African listed shares with low historical volatility earned higher risk-adjusted returns over the period July 2004 to September 2018. Low-volatility shares delivered a Sharpe ratio of 1.10 compared to 0.65 produced by the Financial Times Stock Exchange / Johannesburg Stock Exchange Shareholder Weighted Index over the same period. Practical/managerial implications: The assumption that return in an investment portfolio could be enhanced by taking on more risk could be wrong. It seems that fund managers could potentially enhance returns and decrease risk in their portfolios by focussing on shares with low historical volatility. Contribution/value-add: The negative relationship observed between volatility and return is inconsistent with theoretical expectations. Therefore, the results of this article suggest that investors are not rewarded for assuming higher levels of risk.https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/448low riskrisk-adjusted returnvolatilitybetastandard deviationanomaly
spellingShingle Johannes P. Steyn
Lomari Theart
Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences
low risk
risk-adjusted return
volatility
beta
standard deviation
anomaly
title Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?
title_full Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?
title_fullStr Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?
title_full_unstemmed Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?
title_short Are South African equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk?
title_sort are south african equity investors rewarded for taking on more risk
topic low risk
risk-adjusted return
volatility
beta
standard deviation
anomaly
url https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/448
work_keys_str_mv AT johannespsteyn aresouthafricanequityinvestorsrewardedfortakingonmorerisk
AT lomaritheart aresouthafricanequityinvestorsrewardedfortakingonmorerisk