Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice
The subject of the study is a phenomenon of an “entropy” of property, its interpretation, socio-economic conditionality, genesis of its development in European and Russian doctrine, reflection of a construct of “separated” property in the legislation. “Entropy” of property is a situation when both e...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Pravoprimenenie |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/442 |
| _version_ | 1797874031638085632 |
|---|---|
| author | M. N. Semyakin A. V. Gubareva S. P. Stepkin |
| author_facet | M. N. Semyakin A. V. Gubareva S. P. Stepkin |
| author_sort | M. N. Semyakin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The subject of the study is a phenomenon of an “entropy” of property, its interpretation, socio-economic conditionality, genesis of its development in European and Russian doctrine, reflection of a construct of “separated” property in the legislation. “Entropy” of property is a situation when both entities are owners, but in different areas of relations: the first person is the owner in relation to third parties, and the second-in relation to the first The goal of this scientific research is to find out reasons of the existence of phenomenon of “entropy of property” in European and Russian legal doctrines, to identify common and specific features of this phenomenon. Methodology. The authors use the general scientific method, including dialectics, comparative analysis, formal logic, historical method. A number of specific methods pertaining to the legal science were used as well: the formal dogmatic method was applied for analysis of ownership within the institute of property rights; the logical legal method was applied to study general tendencies of development of the institute of property rights; the legal comparative method was used to study European and Russian legislation on ownership and other property rights. The main scientific results. The Western legal doctrine of “entropy of property” has quite a long history of development, unlike the Russian. Specific features of the Russian doctrine are result of its historical, political and cultural characteristics. The phenomenon of “entropy of property” has both positive and negative consequences, which requires pluralistic approach to its assessment. “Reunification” of ownership rights on the land plot and other objects located on it, is a result of socio-economic and legal factors and deserves positive assessment. Property rights as elements of titular possession are not based only on law, but may be created by contract as well. Conclusions. The European and Russian legal doctrines on the “entropy of property” have both common and specific features. The common features are: existence of “absolute” ownership, limited property rights, trends of reunification of “separated” property etc. The specific features are: absence of “trust” in the Russian legal system; excessive fragmentation of right of ownership as a large “bundle” of rights; absence of situations when one person may simultaneously hold statuses of owner and holder of a limited property right in the Russian legislation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:24:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d7ba84c367884438994c0ecd8a003180 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2542-1514 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:24:23Z |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | Dostoevsky Omsk State University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pravoprimenenie |
| spelling | doaj.art-d7ba84c367884438994c0ecd8a0031802023-03-13T09:40:21ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityPravoprimenenie2542-15142021-04-015115617210.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(1).156-172290Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practiceM. N. Semyakin0A. V. Gubareva1S. P. Stepkin2Ural State Law UniversityUral State Law UniversityRussian State Social UniversityThe subject of the study is a phenomenon of an “entropy” of property, its interpretation, socio-economic conditionality, genesis of its development in European and Russian doctrine, reflection of a construct of “separated” property in the legislation. “Entropy” of property is a situation when both entities are owners, but in different areas of relations: the first person is the owner in relation to third parties, and the second-in relation to the first The goal of this scientific research is to find out reasons of the existence of phenomenon of “entropy of property” in European and Russian legal doctrines, to identify common and specific features of this phenomenon. Methodology. The authors use the general scientific method, including dialectics, comparative analysis, formal logic, historical method. A number of specific methods pertaining to the legal science were used as well: the formal dogmatic method was applied for analysis of ownership within the institute of property rights; the logical legal method was applied to study general tendencies of development of the institute of property rights; the legal comparative method was used to study European and Russian legislation on ownership and other property rights. The main scientific results. The Western legal doctrine of “entropy of property” has quite a long history of development, unlike the Russian. Specific features of the Russian doctrine are result of its historical, political and cultural characteristics. The phenomenon of “entropy of property” has both positive and negative consequences, which requires pluralistic approach to its assessment. “Reunification” of ownership rights on the land plot and other objects located on it, is a result of socio-economic and legal factors and deserves positive assessment. Property rights as elements of titular possession are not based only on law, but may be created by contract as well. Conclusions. The European and Russian legal doctrines on the “entropy of property” have both common and specific features. The common features are: existence of “absolute” ownership, limited property rights, trends of reunification of “separated” property etc. The specific features are: absence of “trust” in the Russian legal system; excessive fragmentation of right of ownership as a large “bundle” of rights; absence of situations when one person may simultaneously hold statuses of owner and holder of a limited property right in the Russian legislation.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/442entropy of propertysplit propertyproperty rightproprietary rightsproperty contracttrust property managementreceptiontrustcivil law |
| spellingShingle | M. N. Semyakin A. V. Gubareva S. P. Stepkin Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice Pravoprimenenie entropy of property split property property right proprietary rights property contract trust property management reception trust civil law |
| title | Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice |
| title_full | Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice |
| title_fullStr | Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice |
| title_short | Entropy of property in Western and Russian legal doctrine and practice |
| title_sort | entropy of property in western and russian legal doctrine and practice |
| topic | entropy of property split property property right proprietary rights property contract trust property management reception trust civil law |
| url | https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/442 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mnsemyakin entropyofpropertyinwesternandrussianlegaldoctrineandpractice AT avgubareva entropyofpropertyinwesternandrussianlegaldoctrineandpractice AT spstepkin entropyofpropertyinwesternandrussianlegaldoctrineandpractice |