Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine

Introduction: Physicians’ main responsibility is to practice medicine for the benefit of patients. However, there are situations where secondary interests affect this commitment and give rise to conflicts of interest. Objective: To analyze currently available systematic reviews and meta-analyses o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mario Arturo González-Mariño
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2020-01-01
Series:Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/73475
_version_ 1797824936607219712
author Mario Arturo González-Mariño
author_facet Mario Arturo González-Mariño
author_sort Mario Arturo González-Mariño
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Physicians’ main responsibility is to practice medicine for the benefit of patients. However, there are situations where secondary interests affect this commitment and give rise to conflicts of interest. Objective: To analyze currently available systematic reviews and meta-analyses on conflicts of interest in medicine to summarize relevant evidence in this regard. Material and methods: A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE and LILACS databases using the following search strategy: systematic reviews and meta-analysis on conflicts of interests in medicine published in serialized scientific journals; no publication time or language limits were applied. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were grouped according to the medical activity they assessed, and information on the type and number of studies and conclusions of all publications included in the review was collected. Results: 29 publications were included, and they were classified as follows: studies based on research articles, on clinical practice guidelines, on clinical practice, and on patient-oriented papers. Conclusions: It was found that the authors of the original research papers included in the meta-analyses and systematic reviews analyzed here do not always state if they have conflicts of interest or not. Nevertheless, when said conflicts are reported, they tend to present results favoring the drugs or medical technologies of their sponsor.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:46:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7bc4e85abc946cfb46f0a4c10afe3ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0120-0011
2357-3848
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:46:42Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
record_format Article
series Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
spelling doaj.art-d7bc4e85abc946cfb46f0a4c10afe3ea2023-05-17T17:12:05ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaRevista de la Facultad de Medicina0120-00112357-38482020-01-0168110.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73475Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicineMario Arturo González-Mariño0Universidad Nacional de Colombia – Bogotá Campus - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia Introduction: Physicians’ main responsibility is to practice medicine for the benefit of patients. However, there are situations where secondary interests affect this commitment and give rise to conflicts of interest. Objective: To analyze currently available systematic reviews and meta-analyses on conflicts of interest in medicine to summarize relevant evidence in this regard. Material and methods: A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE and LILACS databases using the following search strategy: systematic reviews and meta-analysis on conflicts of interests in medicine published in serialized scientific journals; no publication time or language limits were applied. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were grouped according to the medical activity they assessed, and information on the type and number of studies and conclusions of all publications included in the review was collected. Results: 29 publications were included, and they were classified as follows: studies based on research articles, on clinical practice guidelines, on clinical practice, and on patient-oriented papers. Conclusions: It was found that the authors of the original research papers included in the meta-analyses and systematic reviews analyzed here do not always state if they have conflicts of interest or not. Nevertheless, when said conflicts are reported, they tend to present results favoring the drugs or medical technologies of their sponsor. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/73475Conflict of InterestReviewMedicine
spellingShingle Mario Arturo González-Mariño
Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
Conflict of Interest
Review
Medicine
title Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
title_full Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
title_fullStr Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
title_full_unstemmed Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
title_short Evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
title_sort evidence on conflicts of interest in medicine
topic Conflict of Interest
Review
Medicine
url https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/73475
work_keys_str_mv AT marioarturogonzalezmarino evidenceonconflictsofinterestinmedicine