Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching

Evidence suggests that the features of a stimulus and the actions performed on it are bound together into a coherent mental representation of the episode, which is retrieved from memory upon reencountering at least one of these features. Effects of such binding and retrieval processes emerge in acti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Benini, Iring Koch, Susanne Mayr, Christian Frings, Andrea M. Philipp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/220
_version_ 1817985873174593536
author Elena Benini
Iring Koch
Susanne Mayr
Christian Frings
Andrea M. Philipp
author_facet Elena Benini
Iring Koch
Susanne Mayr
Christian Frings
Andrea M. Philipp
author_sort Elena Benini
collection DOAJ
description Evidence suggests that the features of a stimulus and the actions performed on it are bound together into a coherent mental representation of the episode, which is retrieved from memory upon reencountering at least one of these features. Effects of such binding and retrieval processes emerge in action control, such as in multitasking situations like task switching. In the task-switching paradigm, response-repetition benefits are observed in task repetitions, but response-repetition costs in task switches. This interaction of task repetition (vs. switch) with response repetition (vs. switch) may be explained in terms of task-response binding. In two experiments, we included a task-irrelevant contextual feature in a cued task-switching paradigm using word identification tasks. In Experiment 1, the cue modality could vary between visual and auditory; in Experiment 2, the cue language could vary between English and Spanish, while the target stimulus was always presented visually and in German. We predicted that repeating the contextual feature in the subsequent trial would retrieve the features of the previous trial, even though cue modality or cue language did not afford any response and were not associated with either task. The results showed that response repetition-benefits in task repetitions were observable when the context (i.e., the modality or the language of the cue) repeated but disappeared when the context switched from the previous trial. These results are consistent with context-specific binding and retrieval processes in task switching.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:03:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7bd907a751a453eb776579bb01f94b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2514-4820
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:03:27Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Cognition
spelling doaj.art-d7bd907a751a453eb776579bb01f94b62022-12-22T02:23:38ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202022-04-015110.5334/joc.220239Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task SwitchingElena Benini0Iring Koch1Susanne Mayr2Christian Frings3Andrea M. Philipp4Chair of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen UniversityChair of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen UniversityChair of Psychology and Human-Machine Interaction, University of PassauChair of General Psychology and Methodology, Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of TrierChair of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen UniversityEvidence suggests that the features of a stimulus and the actions performed on it are bound together into a coherent mental representation of the episode, which is retrieved from memory upon reencountering at least one of these features. Effects of such binding and retrieval processes emerge in action control, such as in multitasking situations like task switching. In the task-switching paradigm, response-repetition benefits are observed in task repetitions, but response-repetition costs in task switches. This interaction of task repetition (vs. switch) with response repetition (vs. switch) may be explained in terms of task-response binding. In two experiments, we included a task-irrelevant contextual feature in a cued task-switching paradigm using word identification tasks. In Experiment 1, the cue modality could vary between visual and auditory; in Experiment 2, the cue language could vary between English and Spanish, while the target stimulus was always presented visually and in German. We predicted that repeating the contextual feature in the subsequent trial would retrieve the features of the previous trial, even though cue modality or cue language did not afford any response and were not associated with either task. The results showed that response repetition-benefits in task repetitions were observable when the context (i.e., the modality or the language of the cue) repeated but disappeared when the context switched from the previous trial. These results are consistent with context-specific binding and retrieval processes in task switching.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/220bindingcontextstimulus modalitystimulus languageresponse-repetition effect
spellingShingle Elena Benini
Iring Koch
Susanne Mayr
Christian Frings
Andrea M. Philipp
Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
Journal of Cognition
binding
context
stimulus modality
stimulus language
response-repetition effect
title Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
title_full Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
title_fullStr Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
title_full_unstemmed Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
title_short Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
title_sort contextual features of the cue enter episodic bindings in task switching
topic binding
context
stimulus modality
stimulus language
response-repetition effect
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/220
work_keys_str_mv AT elenabenini contextualfeaturesofthecueenterepisodicbindingsintaskswitching
AT iringkoch contextualfeaturesofthecueenterepisodicbindingsintaskswitching
AT susannemayr contextualfeaturesofthecueenterepisodicbindingsintaskswitching
AT christianfrings contextualfeaturesofthecueenterepisodicbindingsintaskswitching
AT andreamphilipp contextualfeaturesofthecueenterepisodicbindingsintaskswitching