99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.

99MTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein (99MTc-labeled LDL) was developed to detect atherosclerosis by external imaging with the gamma scintillation camera (Lees, et al. J. Nucl. Med. 1985. 26: 1056-1062; Lees, et al. Arteriosclerosis. 1988. 8: 461-470). The present study examined high affinit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AM Lees, RS Lees
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 1991-01-01
Series:Journal of Lipid Research
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520422382
_version_ 1818590508574834688
author AM Lees
RS Lees
author_facet AM Lees
RS Lees
author_sort AM Lees
collection DOAJ
description 99MTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein (99MTc-labeled LDL) was developed to detect atherosclerosis by external imaging with the gamma scintillation camera (Lees, et al. J. Nucl. Med. 1985. 26: 1056-1062; Lees, et al. Arteriosclerosis. 1988. 8: 461-470). The present study examined high affinity LDL receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of 99MTc-labeled LDL by fibroblasts. There were no significant differences between 99MTc-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled LDL in binding parameters or percent inhibition of accumulation, which indicated that 99MTc labeling did not alter receptor recognition of LDL. At 4 degrees C the Kd (+SE) for 99MTc-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled LDL, respectively, was 1.52 +/- 0.24 and 1.45 +/- 0.14 micrograms/ml; Bmax (+/- SE) was 5.45 +/- 0.48 and 4.89 +/- 0.25 ng/well, respectively. Binding was saturated at about 2 micrograms/ml. The complete linearity of 99MTc-labeled LDL accumulation from 0-6 h and the positive slope from 6-24 h indicated that radiolabel that entered cells as 99MTc-labeled LDL was sequestered; pulse-chase experiments, which measured residual cell-associated radioactivity out to 24 h, also showed that radiolabel was trapped. Because radiolabel sequestration was essentially complete, and because 99MTc-labeled LDL was recognized by the LDL receptor equally as well as 125I-labeled LDL, it should be useful not only for imaging atherosclerosis, but also for quantitatively determining sites of utilization and degradation of LDL.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:57:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7d79be3534a45ec992117075e1fab47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-2275
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:57:40Z
publishDate 1991-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Lipid Research
spelling doaj.art-d7d79be3534a45ec992117075e1fab472022-12-21T22:35:53ZengElsevierJournal of Lipid Research0022-22751991-01-013211899mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.AM Lees0RS Lees1Arteriosclerosis Center, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA.Arteriosclerosis Center, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA.99MTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein (99MTc-labeled LDL) was developed to detect atherosclerosis by external imaging with the gamma scintillation camera (Lees, et al. J. Nucl. Med. 1985. 26: 1056-1062; Lees, et al. Arteriosclerosis. 1988. 8: 461-470). The present study examined high affinity LDL receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of 99MTc-labeled LDL by fibroblasts. There were no significant differences between 99MTc-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled LDL in binding parameters or percent inhibition of accumulation, which indicated that 99MTc labeling did not alter receptor recognition of LDL. At 4 degrees C the Kd (+SE) for 99MTc-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled LDL, respectively, was 1.52 +/- 0.24 and 1.45 +/- 0.14 micrograms/ml; Bmax (+/- SE) was 5.45 +/- 0.48 and 4.89 +/- 0.25 ng/well, respectively. Binding was saturated at about 2 micrograms/ml. The complete linearity of 99MTc-labeled LDL accumulation from 0-6 h and the positive slope from 6-24 h indicated that radiolabel that entered cells as 99MTc-labeled LDL was sequestered; pulse-chase experiments, which measured residual cell-associated radioactivity out to 24 h, also showed that radiolabel was trapped. Because radiolabel sequestration was essentially complete, and because 99MTc-labeled LDL was recognized by the LDL receptor equally as well as 125I-labeled LDL, it should be useful not only for imaging atherosclerosis, but also for quantitatively determining sites of utilization and degradation of LDL.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520422382
spellingShingle AM Lees
RS Lees
99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.
Journal of Lipid Research
title 99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.
title_full 99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.
title_fullStr 99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.
title_full_unstemmed 99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.
title_short 99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel.
title_sort 99mtechnetium labeled low density lipoprotein receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520422382
work_keys_str_mv AT amlees 99mtechnetiumlabeledlowdensitylipoproteinreceptorrecognitionandintracellularsequestrationofradiolabel
AT rslees 99mtechnetiumlabeledlowdensitylipoproteinreceptorrecognitionandintracellularsequestrationofradiolabel