Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides

Noos, noein and their derivatives are of central importance to the development of epistemological conceptions in Presocratic philosophy. Already in Homer the terms indicate a special form of cognition, resembling sense perception in its non-inferential nature, which consists in discovering the truth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolò Benzi
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Lille 2016-05-01
Series:Methodos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4326
_version_ 1817990720639729664
author Nicolò Benzi
author_facet Nicolò Benzi
author_sort Nicolò Benzi
collection DOAJ
description Noos, noein and their derivatives are of central importance to the development of epistemological conceptions in Presocratic philosophy. Already in Homer the terms indicate a special form of cognition, resembling sense perception in its non-inferential nature, which consists in discovering the truth beyond mere appearance. In this article, I focus on the role which noos and noein play in the poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides, whose characterizations of noetic cognition, I argue, depend on their response to the problems stemming from the contrast between humans' epistemic limitations and divine omniscience, as traditionally depicted in Archaic Greek poetry. In particular, I consider Hesiod's poems and the implications of his claim to be able to “speak the mind (noos) of Zeus” (Op. 661), which hints at the universal truth he wants to convey through his poetry. However, Hesiod's dependence on the Muses, who can speak both false and true things (Th. 27-28), renders his poetry inevitably ambiguous, as he and his audience cannot know whether what they learn from the divinity is actually true. Xenophanes appropriates the motif of humans' epistemic limitedness by describing mortals as inevitably confined to opinion, and contrasting their condition with the all-powerful noetic capacities of the greatest god. However, I argue, despite mortals' belief-formation ultimately relies on divine disclosure, humans are not condemned to complete ambiguity as in the past poetic tradition, since Xenophanes' very conception of god's noos provides a reliable basis for mortal enquiry which guarantees the actual improvement of humans' opinions over time. Even in Parmenides' poem human noos is repeatedly described as wandering astray, but error is not conceived as an ineluctable human condition. In fact, by stipulating that the correct path of enquiry which mortals' noos ought to follow to attain truth consists in the logical deduction of the attributes of What-Is, Parmenides allows for the actual possibility that humans achieve that universal and absolute truth to which traditionally they could not have access. Thus, by introducing innovations to the traditional notion of divine and mortal noos, Xenophanes and Parmenides respectively assigned to critical enquiry and logical argumentation that essential role which they maintained in the following development of philosophy.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:02:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7dea8f050744c419cb0cac155c8c999
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1769-7379
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:02:47Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Université de Lille
record_format Article
series Methodos
spelling doaj.art-d7dea8f050744c419cb0cac155c8c9992022-12-22T02:21:21ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792016-05-011610.4000/methodos.4326Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and ParmenidesNicolò BenziNoos, noein and their derivatives are of central importance to the development of epistemological conceptions in Presocratic philosophy. Already in Homer the terms indicate a special form of cognition, resembling sense perception in its non-inferential nature, which consists in discovering the truth beyond mere appearance. In this article, I focus on the role which noos and noein play in the poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides, whose characterizations of noetic cognition, I argue, depend on their response to the problems stemming from the contrast between humans' epistemic limitations and divine omniscience, as traditionally depicted in Archaic Greek poetry. In particular, I consider Hesiod's poems and the implications of his claim to be able to “speak the mind (noos) of Zeus” (Op. 661), which hints at the universal truth he wants to convey through his poetry. However, Hesiod's dependence on the Muses, who can speak both false and true things (Th. 27-28), renders his poetry inevitably ambiguous, as he and his audience cannot know whether what they learn from the divinity is actually true. Xenophanes appropriates the motif of humans' epistemic limitedness by describing mortals as inevitably confined to opinion, and contrasting their condition with the all-powerful noetic capacities of the greatest god. However, I argue, despite mortals' belief-formation ultimately relies on divine disclosure, humans are not condemned to complete ambiguity as in the past poetic tradition, since Xenophanes' very conception of god's noos provides a reliable basis for mortal enquiry which guarantees the actual improvement of humans' opinions over time. Even in Parmenides' poem human noos is repeatedly described as wandering astray, but error is not conceived as an ineluctable human condition. In fact, by stipulating that the correct path of enquiry which mortals' noos ought to follow to attain truth consists in the logical deduction of the attributes of What-Is, Parmenides allows for the actual possibility that humans achieve that universal and absolute truth to which traditionally they could not have access. Thus, by introducing innovations to the traditional notion of divine and mortal noos, Xenophanes and Parmenides respectively assigned to critical enquiry and logical argumentation that essential role which they maintained in the following development of philosophy.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4326intelligencemindHomerHesiodXenophanesParmenides
spellingShingle Nicolò Benzi
Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides
Methodos
intelligence
mind
Homer
Hesiod
Xenophanes
Parmenides
title Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides
title_full Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides
title_fullStr Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides
title_full_unstemmed Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides
title_short Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides
title_sort noos and mortal enquiry in the poetry of xenophanes and parmenides
topic intelligence
mind
Homer
Hesiod
Xenophanes
Parmenides
url http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4326
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolobenzi noosandmortalenquiryinthepoetryofxenophanesandparmenides