G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity”
The article presents G. Friedlander’s peer-review on M. Bakhtin’s manuscript of the collection of works. This is the first publication of G. Friedlander’s text written at December 26, 1973. It provides the detailed analysis and assessment of Bakhtin’s book that was published in 1975 under the title...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Studia Litterarum |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://studlit.ru/images/2022-7-4/17_Osovskiy_Dubrovskaya_316-335.pdf |
_version_ | 1811184945863852032 |
---|---|
author | Oleg E. Osovskiy Svetlana A. Dubrovskaya |
author_facet | Oleg E. Osovskiy Svetlana A. Dubrovskaya |
author_sort | Oleg E. Osovskiy |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The article presents G. Friedlander’s peer-review on M. Bakhtin’s manuscript of the collection of works. This is the first publication of G. Friedlander’s text written at December 26, 1973. It provides the detailed analysis and assessment of Bakhtin’s book that was published in 1975 under the title “Questions of Literature and Aesthetics.” Highly assessing the scholar’s contribution to Russian literary criticism, the reviewer underlines the innovative nature of the previously unpublished articles in the collection. Bakhtin’s attitude to the “formal school” and his criticism of “material aesthetics” are also important to him. It allows G. Friedlander to name Bakhtin among the most authoritative opponents of structuralism and other schools of Western literary criticism. The most significant to the reviewer are Bakhtin’s discoveries in the field of historical poetics, primarily in the history and theory of the novel. One of the points of G. Friedlander’s disagreement was the interpretation of Gogol’s laughter in the context of Rabelais’ work. The publication of the review is accompanied by the preface, which reconstructs the context of the reception of Bakhtin’s ideas in the late Soviet era, indicates the points of dialogue between G. Friedlander and M. Bakhtin in the 1950s–1970s. The publication is provided with notes. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:21:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d7ea848a700f4d499c6e38fc9a9c1d82 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2500-4247 2541-8564 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:21:54Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Studia Litterarum |
spelling | doaj.art-d7ea848a700f4d499c6e38fc9a9c1d822022-12-22T04:22:11ZengA.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642022-12-017431633510.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-4-316-335G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity”Oleg E. Osovskiy0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9869-3233Svetlana A. Dubrovskaya1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-8977Mordovian State Pedagogical University named after M.E. Evseveva, Saransk, RussiaNational Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk, RussiaThe article presents G. Friedlander’s peer-review on M. Bakhtin’s manuscript of the collection of works. This is the first publication of G. Friedlander’s text written at December 26, 1973. It provides the detailed analysis and assessment of Bakhtin’s book that was published in 1975 under the title “Questions of Literature and Aesthetics.” Highly assessing the scholar’s contribution to Russian literary criticism, the reviewer underlines the innovative nature of the previously unpublished articles in the collection. Bakhtin’s attitude to the “formal school” and his criticism of “material aesthetics” are also important to him. It allows G. Friedlander to name Bakhtin among the most authoritative opponents of structuralism and other schools of Western literary criticism. The most significant to the reviewer are Bakhtin’s discoveries in the field of historical poetics, primarily in the history and theory of the novel. One of the points of G. Friedlander’s disagreement was the interpretation of Gogol’s laughter in the context of Rabelais’ work. The publication of the review is accompanied by the preface, which reconstructs the context of the reception of Bakhtin’s ideas in the late Soviet era, indicates the points of dialogue between G. Friedlander and M. Bakhtin in the 1950s–1970s. The publication is provided with notes.http://studlit.ru/images/2022-7-4/17_Osovskiy_Dubrovskaya_316-335.pdfm. bakhting. friedlanders. averintsevhistory of the 20th centuryrussian literary criticism“questions of literature and aesthetics” peer-review. |
spellingShingle | Oleg E. Osovskiy Svetlana A. Dubrovskaya G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity” Studia Litterarum m. bakhtin g. friedlander s. averintsev history of the 20th century russian literary criticism “questions of literature and aesthetics ” peer-review. |
title | G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity” |
title_full | G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity” |
title_fullStr | G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity” |
title_full_unstemmed | G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity” |
title_short | G.M. Fredlender’s Review on M.M. Bakhtin’s “To the Issues of the Methodology of the Aesthetics of Verbal-artistic Creativity” |
title_sort | g m fredlender s review on m m bakhtin s to the issues of the methodology of the aesthetics of verbal artistic creativity |
topic | m. bakhtin g. friedlander s. averintsev history of the 20th century russian literary criticism “questions of literature and aesthetics ” peer-review. |
url | http://studlit.ru/images/2022-7-4/17_Osovskiy_Dubrovskaya_316-335.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olegeosovskiy gmfredlendersreviewonmmbakhtinstotheissuesofthemethodologyoftheaestheticsofverbalartisticcreativity AT svetlanaadubrovskaya gmfredlendersreviewonmmbakhtinstotheissuesofthemethodologyoftheaestheticsofverbalartisticcreativity |