Major mistakes and errors in the use of Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – protocol for a systematic review
Abstract Background Adequately conducted systematic reviews with meta-analyses are considered the highest level of evidence and thus directly defines many clinical guidelines. However, the risks of type I and II errors in meta-analyses are substantial. Trial Sequential Analysis is a method for contr...
Main Authors: | Christian Gunge Riberholt, Markus Harboe Olsen, Joachim Birch Milan, Christian Gluud |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01987-4 |
Similar Items
-
Concentrations, Number of Doses, and Formulations of Aluminium Adjuvants in Vaccines: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
by: Marija Barbateskovic, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
by: Chih-Hao Chen, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Attenuation of increased intraocular pressure with propofol anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
by: Chun-Yu Chang, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Acupuncture for mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
by: Zihan Yin, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Risk of infection in roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
by: Shan Chong, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)