Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist
This review aimed to evaluate the quality of case reports where acupotomy was performed according to the CAse REport (CARE) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. Case reports on acupotomy published in Korea from 2013 to October 2020 were included in this revi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MEDrang Inc.
2021-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Acupuncture Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.e-jar.org/upload/pdf/jar-2021-00024.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797203876370186240 |
|---|---|
| author | Hyungsun Jun Sang-Hoon Yoon Minyeong Roh Seon-hye Kim Jisu Lee Jihyun Lee Miri Kwon Jungtae Leem |
| author_facet | Hyungsun Jun Sang-Hoon Yoon Minyeong Roh Seon-hye Kim Jisu Lee Jihyun Lee Miri Kwon Jungtae Leem |
| author_sort | Hyungsun Jun |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This review aimed to evaluate the quality of case reports where acupotomy was performed according to the CAse REport (CARE) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. Case reports on acupotomy published in Korea from 2013 to October 2020 were included in this review. A total of 28 acupotomy related case reports were selected, and a quality evaluation was verified using the CARE guidelines and JBI critical appraisal checklist. Among the case reports, spinal conditions/diseases were most commonly reported. The overall complete reporting rate for each study was relatively high (median of 63.4% according to the CARE guidelines and 73.4% according to JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports and 62% for case series). However, low reporting rates were determined in several subcategories namely, “Intervention adherence and tolerability,” “Timeline,” “Diagnostic challenges,” “Patient perspective,” and “Adverse or unanticipated events” for case reports, and “Reporting of the presenting site/clinic,” “Demographic information,” “Statistical analysis,” and “Clear criteria for inclusion” for case series. When reporting cases where acupotomy was performed, it is recommended that the CARE guidelines are followed to improve the quality of research. In addition, new guidelines and tools for the clinical situation of Korean medicine should be developed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:26:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d7f018245ae04de0bddd483a2633a020 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2586-288X 2586-2898 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:26:18Z |
| publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
| publisher | MEDrang Inc. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Acupuncture Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-d7f018245ae04de0bddd483a2633a0202024-04-16T22:17:05ZengMEDrang Inc.Journal of Acupuncture Research2586-288X2586-28982021-05-0138212213310.13045/jar.2021.000242526Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal ChecklistHyungsun Jun0Sang-Hoon Yoon1Minyeong Roh2Seon-hye Kim3Jisu Lee4Jihyun Lee5Miri Kwon6Jungtae Leem7 Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea Chung-Yeon Korean Medicine Clinic, Seoul, Korea Department of Internal Korean Medicine, Dong-Shin Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, Korea Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, Dong-Shin Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, Korea Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, Dong-Shin Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, Korea Department of Internal Korean Medicine, Dong-Shin Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Korean Medicine, Dong-Shin Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, Korea Research Center of Traditional Korean Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, KoreaThis review aimed to evaluate the quality of case reports where acupotomy was performed according to the CAse REport (CARE) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. Case reports on acupotomy published in Korea from 2013 to October 2020 were included in this review. A total of 28 acupotomy related case reports were selected, and a quality evaluation was verified using the CARE guidelines and JBI critical appraisal checklist. Among the case reports, spinal conditions/diseases were most commonly reported. The overall complete reporting rate for each study was relatively high (median of 63.4% according to the CARE guidelines and 73.4% according to JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports and 62% for case series). However, low reporting rates were determined in several subcategories namely, “Intervention adherence and tolerability,” “Timeline,” “Diagnostic challenges,” “Patient perspective,” and “Adverse or unanticipated events” for case reports, and “Reporting of the presenting site/clinic,” “Demographic information,” “Statistical analysis,” and “Clear criteria for inclusion” for case series. When reporting cases where acupotomy was performed, it is recommended that the CARE guidelines are followed to improve the quality of research. In addition, new guidelines and tools for the clinical situation of Korean medicine should be developed.http://www.e-jar.org/upload/pdf/jar-2021-00024.pdfacupotomycase reportguideline adherencequality |
| spellingShingle | Hyungsun Jun Sang-Hoon Yoon Minyeong Roh Seon-hye Kim Jisu Lee Jihyun Lee Miri Kwon Jungtae Leem Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist Journal of Acupuncture Research acupotomy case report guideline adherence quality |
| title | Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist |
| title_full | Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist |
| title_fullStr | Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist |
| title_short | Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist |
| title_sort | quality assessment and implications for further study of acupotomy case reports using the case report guidelines and the joanna briggs institute critical appraisal checklist |
| topic | acupotomy case report guideline adherence quality |
| url | http://www.e-jar.org/upload/pdf/jar-2021-00024.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hyungsunjun qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT sanghoonyoon qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT minyeongroh qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT seonhyekim qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT jisulee qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT jihyunlee qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT mirikwon qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist AT jungtaeleem qualityassessmentandimplicationsforfurtherstudyofacupotomycasereportsusingthecasereportguidelinesandthejoannabriggsinstitutecriticalappraisalchecklist |