Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers
The nature of performing a scientific research is a process that has several different components which consist of identifying the key research question(s), choices of scientific approach for the study and data collection, data analysis, and finally reporting on results. Generally, peer review is a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=1;epage=6;aulast=Masic |
| _version_ | 1819115990202449920 |
|---|---|
| author | Izet Masic |
| author_facet | Izet Masic |
| author_sort | Izet Masic |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The nature of performing a scientific research is a process that has several different components which consist of identifying the key research question(s), choices of scientific approach for the study and data collection, data analysis, and finally reporting on results. Generally, peer review is a series of procedures in the evaluation of a creative work or performance by other people, who work in the same or related field, with the aim of maintaining and improving the quality of work or performance in that field. The assessment of the achievement of every scientist, and thus indirectly determining his reputation in the scientific community of these publications, especially journals, is done through the so-called impact factor index. The impact factor predicts or estimates that how many annual citations article may receive after its publication. Evaluation of scientific productivity and assessment of the published articles of researchers and scientists can be made through the so-called H-index. The quality of published results of scientific work largely depends on knowledge sources that are used in the preparation, which means that it should be considered to serve the purpose and the very relevance of the information used. Scientometrics as a field of science covers all aforementioned issues, and scientometric analysis is obligatory for quality assessment of the scientific validity of published articles and other type of publications. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:09:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d7f3b9437ebe459f9eb54ed28e118842 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2319-9644 2279-042X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:09:58Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice |
| spelling | doaj.art-d7f3b9437ebe459f9eb54ed28e1188422022-12-21T18:38:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Pharmacy Practice2319-96442279-042X2016-01-01511610.4103/2279-042X.176562Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewersIzet MasicThe nature of performing a scientific research is a process that has several different components which consist of identifying the key research question(s), choices of scientific approach for the study and data collection, data analysis, and finally reporting on results. Generally, peer review is a series of procedures in the evaluation of a creative work or performance by other people, who work in the same or related field, with the aim of maintaining and improving the quality of work or performance in that field. The assessment of the achievement of every scientist, and thus indirectly determining his reputation in the scientific community of these publications, especially journals, is done through the so-called impact factor index. The impact factor predicts or estimates that how many annual citations article may receive after its publication. Evaluation of scientific productivity and assessment of the published articles of researchers and scientists can be made through the so-called H-index. The quality of published results of scientific work largely depends on knowledge sources that are used in the preparation, which means that it should be considered to serve the purpose and the very relevance of the information used. Scientometrics as a field of science covers all aforementioned issues, and scientometric analysis is obligatory for quality assessment of the scientific validity of published articles and other type of publications.http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=1;epage=6;aulast=MasicScientific publications; scientific validity; scientometrics |
| spellingShingle | Izet Masic Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Scientific publications; scientific validity; scientometrics |
| title | Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers |
| title_full | Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers |
| title_fullStr | Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers |
| title_short | Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers |
| title_sort | scientometric analysis a technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers |
| topic | Scientific publications; scientific validity; scientometrics |
| url | http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=1;epage=6;aulast=Masic |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT izetmasic scientometricanalysisatechnicalneedformedicalscienceresearcherseitherasauthorsoraspeerreviewers |