A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994

Textual interpretation is the prevailing mode of interpretation. Significant exceptions exist. The choice of means of interpretation and the different weight attributed to them can shape the outcome of interpretation. Different means applied to the same term can sometimes create different clarificat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Etinski Rodoljub M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law 2018-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2018/0550-21791803819E.pdf
_version_ 1828896392789098496
author Etinski Rodoljub M.
author_facet Etinski Rodoljub M.
author_sort Etinski Rodoljub M.
collection DOAJ
description Textual interpretation is the prevailing mode of interpretation. Significant exceptions exist. The choice of means of interpretation and the different weight attributed to them can shape the outcome of interpretation. Different means applied to the same term can sometimes create different clarifications. Moving decisive significance from one to another means can occasionally change the outcome of interpretation. There are many factors that determine the choice and weight of the means of interpretation. The spirit, as originates from the object and purpose of the GATT 1994, might be in the background of all of them. The interpretation does not operate without certain inconsistencies and difficulties.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:42:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d80723080340445fae773d3375363e08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0550-2179
2406-1255
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:42:33Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
record_format Article
series Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
spelling doaj.art-d80723080340445fae773d3375363e082022-12-21T23:41:35ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552018-01-015238198540550-21791803819EA critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994Etinski Rodoljub M.0Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultetTextual interpretation is the prevailing mode of interpretation. Significant exceptions exist. The choice of means of interpretation and the different weight attributed to them can shape the outcome of interpretation. Different means applied to the same term can sometimes create different clarifications. Moving decisive significance from one to another means can occasionally change the outcome of interpretation. There are many factors that determine the choice and weight of the means of interpretation. The spirit, as originates from the object and purpose of the GATT 1994, might be in the background of all of them. The interpretation does not operate without certain inconsistencies and difficulties.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2018/0550-21791803819E.pdfinterpretationthe GATT 1994national treatmentsexceptions
spellingShingle Etinski Rodoljub M.
A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
interpretation
the GATT 1994
national treatments
exceptions
title A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994
title_full A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994
title_fullStr A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994
title_full_unstemmed A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994
title_short A critical review of interpretation of articles III and XX of the GATT 1994
title_sort critical review of interpretation of articles iii and xx of the gatt 1994
topic interpretation
the GATT 1994
national treatments
exceptions
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2018/0550-21791803819E.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT etinskirodoljubm acriticalreviewofinterpretationofarticlesiiiandxxofthegatt1994
AT etinskirodoljubm criticalreviewofinterpretationofarticlesiiiandxxofthegatt1994