Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.

Considerable debate has focused on whether adults possess an implicit system for representing others' mental states. Some argue that people automatically represent the perspective of others using evidence from altercentric interference-cases in which another agent's perspective affects the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Marshall, Anton Gollwitzer, Laurie R Santos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5864002?pdf=render
_version_ 1819105864737357824
author Julia Marshall
Anton Gollwitzer
Laurie R Santos
author_facet Julia Marshall
Anton Gollwitzer
Laurie R Santos
author_sort Julia Marshall
collection DOAJ
description Considerable debate has focused on whether adults possess an implicit system for representing others' mental states. Some argue that people automatically represent the perspective of others using evidence from altercentric interference-cases in which another agent's perspective affects the speed with which one can report one's own perspective. Others have argued that altercentric interference is not always specific to social stimuli and thus may represent a simpler process such as submentalizing. To distinguish between these positions, Study 1 developed a novel measure of altercentric interference-a "sandbox" measure-that allowed us to more sensitively assess altercentric interference across social and non-social conditions. We replicated previous findings showing that participants experience both egocentric and altercentric interference, but we found that these effects emerge equally in social and non-social conditions. To further test whether altercentric interference emerges in social perspective-taking situations, Study 2 conducted a conceptual replication of a study which used a novel "goggle" paradigm to assess whether individuals implicitly represent others' perspectives. Although we failed to find evidence of altercentric interference in response times, participants' accuracy reflected the possibility of interference from others' perspectives. We argue that these findings provide support for the idea that altercentric interference in response to social stimuli (an avatar) is driven by perspective-taking mechanisms, while such interference in response to non-social stimuli (an arrow) is driven by attention-cuing mechanisms.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T02:29:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d826beff9bc441ad9bd2388e7ec024fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T02:29:02Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d826beff9bc441ad9bd2388e7ec024fe2022-12-21T18:41:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019410110.1371/journal.pone.0194101Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.Julia MarshallAnton GollwitzerLaurie R SantosConsiderable debate has focused on whether adults possess an implicit system for representing others' mental states. Some argue that people automatically represent the perspective of others using evidence from altercentric interference-cases in which another agent's perspective affects the speed with which one can report one's own perspective. Others have argued that altercentric interference is not always specific to social stimuli and thus may represent a simpler process such as submentalizing. To distinguish between these positions, Study 1 developed a novel measure of altercentric interference-a "sandbox" measure-that allowed us to more sensitively assess altercentric interference across social and non-social conditions. We replicated previous findings showing that participants experience both egocentric and altercentric interference, but we found that these effects emerge equally in social and non-social conditions. To further test whether altercentric interference emerges in social perspective-taking situations, Study 2 conducted a conceptual replication of a study which used a novel "goggle" paradigm to assess whether individuals implicitly represent others' perspectives. Although we failed to find evidence of altercentric interference in response times, participants' accuracy reflected the possibility of interference from others' perspectives. We argue that these findings provide support for the idea that altercentric interference in response to social stimuli (an avatar) is driven by perspective-taking mechanisms, while such interference in response to non-social stimuli (an arrow) is driven by attention-cuing mechanisms.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5864002?pdf=render
spellingShingle Julia Marshall
Anton Gollwitzer
Laurie R Santos
Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.
PLoS ONE
title Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.
title_full Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.
title_fullStr Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.
title_full_unstemmed Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.
title_short Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.
title_sort does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing results from two level 1 perspective taking tasks
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5864002?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT juliamarshall doesaltercentricinterferencerelyonmentalizingresultsfromtwolevel1perspectivetakingtasks
AT antongollwitzer doesaltercentricinterferencerelyonmentalizingresultsfromtwolevel1perspectivetakingtasks
AT lauriersantos doesaltercentricinterferencerelyonmentalizingresultsfromtwolevel1perspectivetakingtasks