Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over

Aims: The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sondre Hassellund, Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson, John Håkon Williksen, Torstein Husby, Jan Erik Madsen, Frede Frihagen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-12-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0108.R1
_version_ 1818362849428242432
author Sondre Hassellund
Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson
John Håkon Williksen
Torstein Husby
Jan Erik Madsen
Frede Frihagen
author_facet Sondre Hassellund
Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson
John Håkon Williksen
Torstein Husby
Jan Erik Madsen
Frede Frihagen
author_sort Sondre Hassellund
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. We prospectively collected data on resource use during the first year post-fracture, and estimated costs of initial treatment, further operations, physiotherapy, home nursing, and production loss. Health-related quality of life was based on the Euro-QoL five-dimension, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility index, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Results: The mean QALYs were 0.05 higher in the operative group during the first 12 months (p = 0.260). The healthcare provider costs were €1,533 higher per patient in the operative group: €3,589 in the operative group and 2,056 in the nonoperative group. With a suggested willingness to pay of €27,500 per QALY there was a 45% chance for operative treatment to be cost-effective. For both groups, the main costs were related to the primary treatment. The primary surgery was the main driver of the difference between the groups. The costs related to loss of production were high in both groups, despite high rates of retirement. Retirement rate was unevenly distributed between the groups and was not included in the analysis. Conclusion: Surgical treatment was not cost-effective in patients aged 65 years and older compared to nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in a healthcare perspective. Costs related to loss of production might change this in the future if the retirement age increases. Level of evidence: II Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1027–1034.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T21:39:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8283a9fb39d4d79a0386c1b262874cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2633-1462
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T21:39:07Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj.art-d8283a9fb39d4d79a0386c1b262874cc2022-12-21T23:30:36ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622021-12-012121027103410.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0108.R1Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and overSondre Hassellund0Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson1John Håkon Williksen2Torstein Husby3Jan Erik Madsen4Frede Frihagen5Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Medicines Agency, Skøyen, NorwayDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayAims: The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. We prospectively collected data on resource use during the first year post-fracture, and estimated costs of initial treatment, further operations, physiotherapy, home nursing, and production loss. Health-related quality of life was based on the Euro-QoL five-dimension, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility index, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Results: The mean QALYs were 0.05 higher in the operative group during the first 12 months (p = 0.260). The healthcare provider costs were €1,533 higher per patient in the operative group: €3,589 in the operative group and 2,056 in the nonoperative group. With a suggested willingness to pay of €27,500 per QALY there was a 45% chance for operative treatment to be cost-effective. For both groups, the main costs were related to the primary treatment. The primary surgery was the main driver of the difference between the groups. The costs related to loss of production were high in both groups, despite high rates of retirement. Retirement rate was unevenly distributed between the groups and was not included in the analysis. Conclusion: Surgical treatment was not cost-effective in patients aged 65 years and older compared to nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in a healthcare perspective. Costs related to loss of production might change this in the future if the retirement age increases. Level of evidence: II Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1027–1034.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0108.R1distal radius fracturecolle's fracturecost-benefithealth economic evaluationnonoperative treatmentfractures of the distal radiusnonoperative treatmentsurgical treatmentrandomized controlled trialeq-5d-5lprimary surgeryphysiotherapyvolar locking platesquick-dashdisplaced fractures
spellingShingle Sondre Hassellund
Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson
John Håkon Williksen
Torstein Husby
Jan Erik Madsen
Frede Frihagen
Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
Bone & Joint Open
distal radius fracture
colle's fracture
cost-benefit
health economic evaluation
nonoperative treatment
fractures of the distal radius
nonoperative treatment
surgical treatment
randomized controlled trial
eq-5d-5l
primary surgery
physiotherapy
volar locking plates
quick-dash
displaced fractures
title Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
title_full Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
title_fullStr Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
title_short Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
title_sort surgical treatment is not cost effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over
topic distal radius fracture
colle's fracture
cost-benefit
health economic evaluation
nonoperative treatment
fractures of the distal radius
nonoperative treatment
surgical treatment
randomized controlled trial
eq-5d-5l
primary surgery
physiotherapy
volar locking plates
quick-dash
displaced fractures
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0108.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT sondrehassellund surgicaltreatmentisnotcosteffectivecomparedtononoperativetreatmentfordisplaceddistalradiusfracturesinpatients65yearsandover
AT zinajdazolickarlsson surgicaltreatmentisnotcosteffectivecomparedtononoperativetreatmentfordisplaceddistalradiusfracturesinpatients65yearsandover
AT johnhakonwilliksen surgicaltreatmentisnotcosteffectivecomparedtononoperativetreatmentfordisplaceddistalradiusfracturesinpatients65yearsandover
AT torsteinhusby surgicaltreatmentisnotcosteffectivecomparedtononoperativetreatmentfordisplaceddistalradiusfracturesinpatients65yearsandover
AT janerikmadsen surgicaltreatmentisnotcosteffectivecomparedtononoperativetreatmentfordisplaceddistalradiusfracturesinpatients65yearsandover
AT fredefrihagen surgicaltreatmentisnotcosteffectivecomparedtononoperativetreatmentfordisplaceddistalradiusfracturesinpatients65yearsandover