Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system

INTRODUCTION Nowadays we typically use patient experience as a quality of care indicator, although this has some limitations. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patient, physician and practice characteristics were associated with patient-reported experience of care i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine Cohidon, Pascal Wild, Nicolas Senn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2018-04-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2459
_version_ 1811194376084258816
author Christine Cohidon
Pascal Wild
Nicolas Senn
author_facet Christine Cohidon
Pascal Wild
Nicolas Senn
author_sort Christine Cohidon
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION Nowadays we typically use patient experience as a quality of care indicator, although this has some limitations. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patient, physician and practice characteristics were associated with patient-reported experience of care in the major dimensions in family medicine in a fee-for-service system. METHODS The data came from the Swiss part of the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC) study, an international cross-sectional survey. A random sample of 194 Swiss family physicians and 1540 of their patients were included in this analysis. We assessed patient experience using three scores characterising access, communication and continuity-coordination. Multilevel statistical methods were used to analyse these scores based on patient-level, physician-level and practice-level factors. RESULTS Poor experience of access was associated with poor health (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54–2.55) but was lower among older patients (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63–0.88). Experience of access was also reported as poorer in urban areas and in practices including other paramedical professionals (besides medical assistants) (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06–1.51). Communication was reported as poorer in practices where physicians achieve greater daily face-to-face consultations (IRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08–1.25) and in patients reporting higher incomes (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.52). Additionally, younger patients reported poorer continuity-coordination experience. In the continuity-coordination domain, patient experience appeared better in group practices (including other family physicians) and in those of physicians with a greater weekly workload in terms of hours. Finally, we found experience of communication and continuity better in the French-speaking area than German-speaking area of Switzerland. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we found that patient experience in family medicine in Switzerland was very good for all domains studied; access, family physician-patient communication and continuity-coordination of care. Most often, predictive factors of care experience relate to the patient’s characteristics, such as age and health status. However, several practice characteristics such as size, composition and functioning (in particular, time spent with the patient) represent potential levers for improving patient-reported experience. The variations observed between the three linguistic areas in Switzerland are also interesting, since they raise the issue of the role of sociocultural factors in this field.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:26:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d85059ba5a8844c6ad3cb08c58920a43
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:26:05Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-d85059ba5a8844c6ad3cb08c58920a432022-12-22T03:55:33ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972018-04-01148131410.4414/smw.2018.14601Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service systemChristine Cohidon0Pascal Wild1Nicolas Senn2Institute of Family Medicine, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, SwitzerlandInstitute for Work and Health, Lausanne University and Geneva University, Lausanne, Switzerland; INRS - National Research and Safety Institute, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, FranceInstitute of Family Medicine, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland INTRODUCTION Nowadays we typically use patient experience as a quality of care indicator, although this has some limitations. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patient, physician and practice characteristics were associated with patient-reported experience of care in the major dimensions in family medicine in a fee-for-service system. METHODS The data came from the Swiss part of the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC) study, an international cross-sectional survey. A random sample of 194 Swiss family physicians and 1540 of their patients were included in this analysis. We assessed patient experience using three scores characterising access, communication and continuity-coordination. Multilevel statistical methods were used to analyse these scores based on patient-level, physician-level and practice-level factors. RESULTS Poor experience of access was associated with poor health (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54–2.55) but was lower among older patients (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63–0.88). Experience of access was also reported as poorer in urban areas and in practices including other paramedical professionals (besides medical assistants) (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06–1.51). Communication was reported as poorer in practices where physicians achieve greater daily face-to-face consultations (IRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08–1.25) and in patients reporting higher incomes (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.52). Additionally, younger patients reported poorer continuity-coordination experience. In the continuity-coordination domain, patient experience appeared better in group practices (including other family physicians) and in those of physicians with a greater weekly workload in terms of hours. Finally, we found experience of communication and continuity better in the French-speaking area than German-speaking area of Switzerland. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we found that patient experience in family medicine in Switzerland was very good for all domains studied; access, family physician-patient communication and continuity-coordination of care. Most often, predictive factors of care experience relate to the patient’s characteristics, such as age and health status. However, several practice characteristics such as size, composition and functioning (in particular, time spent with the patient) represent potential levers for improving patient-reported experience. The variations observed between the three linguistic areas in Switzerland are also interesting, since they raise the issue of the role of sociocultural factors in this field. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2459patient experienceaccesscommunicationcoordinationcontinuityfamily medicine
spellingShingle Christine Cohidon
Pascal Wild
Nicolas Senn
Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system
Swiss Medical Weekly
patient experience
access
communication
coordination
continuity
family medicine
title Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system
title_full Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system
title_fullStr Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system
title_full_unstemmed Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system
title_short Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system
title_sort patient experience in primary care association with patient physician and practice characteristics in a fee for service system
topic patient experience
access
communication
coordination
continuity
family medicine
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2459
work_keys_str_mv AT christinecohidon patientexperienceinprimarycareassociationwithpatientphysicianandpracticecharacteristicsinafeeforservicesystem
AT pascalwild patientexperienceinprimarycareassociationwithpatientphysicianandpracticecharacteristicsinafeeforservicesystem
AT nicolassenn patientexperienceinprimarycareassociationwithpatientphysicianandpracticecharacteristicsinafeeforservicesystem