Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense

Previous research has uncovered that the cuticle of P. polyphylla larvae acts as a good nonimmunological barrier against M. pingshaense. In the present study we investigated whether P. polyphylla larvae also show a similarly robust immunological response against M. pingshaense. Firstly, we estimated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J N Enríquez-Vara, A W Guzmán-Franco, R Alatorre-Rosas, H González-Hernández, A Córdoba-Aguilar, J Contreras-Garduño
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Modena and Reggio Emilia 2014-09-01
Series:Invertebrate Survival Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://isj02.unimore.it/index.php/ISJ/article/view/325
_version_ 1818904786699812864
author J N Enríquez-Vara
A W Guzmán-Franco
R Alatorre-Rosas
H González-Hernández
A Córdoba-Aguilar
J Contreras-Garduño
author_facet J N Enríquez-Vara
A W Guzmán-Franco
R Alatorre-Rosas
H González-Hernández
A Córdoba-Aguilar
J Contreras-Garduño
author_sort J N Enríquez-Vara
collection DOAJ
description Previous research has uncovered that the cuticle of P. polyphylla larvae acts as a good nonimmunological barrier against M. pingshaense. In the present study we investigated whether P. polyphylla larvae also show a similarly robust immunological response against M. pingshaense. Firstly, we estimated a median lethal dose (LD50) of blastospores to be injected into the hemocoel. Secondly, we injected the estimated LD50 of blastospores into the hemocoel of larvae to quantify phenoloxidase (PO), nitric oxide (NO) and antimicrobial activity as a response against fungal invasion. In contrast to a previous report that showed that M. pingshaense is unable to kill P. polyphylla after topical applications, here we demonstrate that: (a) 100 % of P. polyphylla larvae died when blastospores were injected into the hemocoel and (b) when injecting the LD50 into the hemocoel of the larvae, immune response did not differ with control. Our results imply that immunological responses do not protect P. polyphylla larvae against M. pingshaense infections. Thus, the cuticle seems a better defense mechanism compared to PO, NO and antimicrobial activity. One proximate explanation for our results is that blastospores are not detected by the host’s immune machinery. An ultimate explanation is that there may be a resource-based tradeoff between non-immunological and immunological barriers, in which white grubs may be investing more in cuticle at the cost of PO, NO and antimicrobial activity.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:12:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8540bb37e6c492787dace1152786f7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1824-307X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:12:59Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
record_format Article
series Invertebrate Survival Journal
spelling doaj.art-d8540bb37e6c492787dace1152786f7e2022-12-21T20:05:27ZengUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaInvertebrate Survival Journal1824-307X2014-09-01111Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaenseJ N Enríquez-Vara0A W Guzmán-Franco1R Alatorre-Rosas2H González-Hernández3A Córdoba-Aguilar4J Contreras-Garduño5Postgrado en Fitosanidad, Especialidad en Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Km 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Texcoco, Edo. de México, 56230, México ; Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. P. 70-275, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510,Coyoacán, Distrito Federal, MéxicoPostgrado en Fitosanidad, Especialidad en Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Km 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Texcoco, Edo. de México, 56230, MéxicoPostgrado en Fitosanidad, Especialidad en Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Km 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Texcoco, Edo. de México, 56230, MéxicoPostgrado en Fitosanidad, Especialidad en Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Km 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Texcoco, Edo. de México, 56230, MéxicoDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. P. 70-275, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510,Coyoacán, Distrito Federal, MéxicoDepartamento de Biología, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Guanajuato, campus Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, Noria Alta, 36050, Guanajuato, Guanajuato, MéxicoPrevious research has uncovered that the cuticle of P. polyphylla larvae acts as a good nonimmunological barrier against M. pingshaense. In the present study we investigated whether P. polyphylla larvae also show a similarly robust immunological response against M. pingshaense. Firstly, we estimated a median lethal dose (LD50) of blastospores to be injected into the hemocoel. Secondly, we injected the estimated LD50 of blastospores into the hemocoel of larvae to quantify phenoloxidase (PO), nitric oxide (NO) and antimicrobial activity as a response against fungal invasion. In contrast to a previous report that showed that M. pingshaense is unable to kill P. polyphylla after topical applications, here we demonstrate that: (a) 100 % of P. polyphylla larvae died when blastospores were injected into the hemocoel and (b) when injecting the LD50 into the hemocoel of the larvae, immune response did not differ with control. Our results imply that immunological responses do not protect P. polyphylla larvae against M. pingshaense infections. Thus, the cuticle seems a better defense mechanism compared to PO, NO and antimicrobial activity. One proximate explanation for our results is that blastospores are not detected by the host’s immune machinery. An ultimate explanation is that there may be a resource-based tradeoff between non-immunological and immunological barriers, in which white grubs may be investing more in cuticle at the cost of PO, NO and antimicrobial activity.https://isj02.unimore.it/index.php/ISJ/article/view/325non-immunological barriersecoimmunologywhite grubsMetarhizium pingshaense
spellingShingle J N Enríquez-Vara
A W Guzmán-Franco
R Alatorre-Rosas
H González-Hernández
A Córdoba-Aguilar
J Contreras-Garduño
Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense
Invertebrate Survival Journal
non-immunological barriers
ecoimmunology
white grubs
Metarhizium pingshaense
title Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense
title_full Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense
title_fullStr Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense
title_full_unstemmed Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense
title_short Immune response of Phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against Metarhizium pingshaense
title_sort immune response of phyllophaga polyphylla larvae is not an effective barrier against metarhizium pingshaense
topic non-immunological barriers
ecoimmunology
white grubs
Metarhizium pingshaense
url https://isj02.unimore.it/index.php/ISJ/article/view/325
work_keys_str_mv AT jnenriquezvara immuneresponseofphyllophagapolyphyllalarvaeisnotaneffectivebarrieragainstmetarhiziumpingshaense
AT awguzmanfranco immuneresponseofphyllophagapolyphyllalarvaeisnotaneffectivebarrieragainstmetarhiziumpingshaense
AT ralatorrerosas immuneresponseofphyllophagapolyphyllalarvaeisnotaneffectivebarrieragainstmetarhiziumpingshaense
AT hgonzalezhernandez immuneresponseofphyllophagapolyphyllalarvaeisnotaneffectivebarrieragainstmetarhiziumpingshaense
AT acordobaaguilar immuneresponseofphyllophagapolyphyllalarvaeisnotaneffectivebarrieragainstmetarhiziumpingshaense
AT jcontrerasgarduno immuneresponseofphyllophagapolyphyllalarvaeisnotaneffectivebarrieragainstmetarhiziumpingshaense