Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis

Background: To compare the diagnostic values of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in staging hepatic fibrosis (HF) in an animal model. Methods: This study consisted of 44 rabbits served as HF group and 9 normal rabbits. HF group was divided into two subgroup...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Qiu Zou, Jie Chen, Liang Pan, Jin-Zhao Jiang, Wei Xing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2015-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=5;spage=620;epage=625;aulast=Zou
_version_ 1828177490639585280
author Li-Qiu Zou
Jie Chen
Liang Pan
Jin-Zhao Jiang
Wei Xing
author_facet Li-Qiu Zou
Jie Chen
Liang Pan
Jin-Zhao Jiang
Wei Xing
author_sort Li-Qiu Zou
collection DOAJ
description Background: To compare the diagnostic values of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in staging hepatic fibrosis (HF) in an animal model. Methods: This study consisted of 44 rabbits served as HF group and 9 normal rabbits. HF group was divided into two subgroups: Group A (n = 32) and Group B (n = 12). Rabbits in Group B were served as a complementary group when rabbits in Group A suddenly died during the study. Rabbits from control and Group A underwent abdominal MR imaging (MRI), MRE, and DWI. In Group A, random eight rabbits underwent MRI examinations at 4, 5, 6, 10 weeks after carbon tetrachloride oil subcutaneous injection. Liver stiffness (LS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of liver parenchyma were measured. The diagnostic performance of MRE and DWI for staging HF was compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the basis of the histopathological analysis of HF. Results: Significant differences of LS and DWI values were present among HF stages (P < 0.005). The LS values measured on MRE (r = 0.838, P < 0.001) were more strongly correlated with the HF stages than with ADC values (r = −0.527, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of LS were significantly larger than those of DWI were for discriminating two stages of HF (0.979 vs. 0.712 for ≥ S1, 0.922 vs. 0.699 for ≥ S2). MRE showed higher specificity for predicting all stages of HF compared to DWI. Conclusions: MRE more strongly correlated with the HF stages than DWI and is more specific in predicting all HF stages.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:59:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d861476c816c4ea7860595141da766bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0366-6999
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:59:35Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Chinese Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-d861476c816c4ea7860595141da766bf2022-12-22T03:47:02ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992015-01-01128562062510.4103/0366-6999.151659Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic FibrosisLi-Qiu ZouJie ChenLiang PanJin-Zhao JiangWei XingBackground: To compare the diagnostic values of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in staging hepatic fibrosis (HF) in an animal model. Methods: This study consisted of 44 rabbits served as HF group and 9 normal rabbits. HF group was divided into two subgroups: Group A (n = 32) and Group B (n = 12). Rabbits in Group B were served as a complementary group when rabbits in Group A suddenly died during the study. Rabbits from control and Group A underwent abdominal MR imaging (MRI), MRE, and DWI. In Group A, random eight rabbits underwent MRI examinations at 4, 5, 6, 10 weeks after carbon tetrachloride oil subcutaneous injection. Liver stiffness (LS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of liver parenchyma were measured. The diagnostic performance of MRE and DWI for staging HF was compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the basis of the histopathological analysis of HF. Results: Significant differences of LS and DWI values were present among HF stages (P < 0.005). The LS values measured on MRE (r = 0.838, P < 0.001) were more strongly correlated with the HF stages than with ADC values (r = −0.527, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of LS were significantly larger than those of DWI were for discriminating two stages of HF (0.979 vs. 0.712 for ≥ S1, 0.922 vs. 0.699 for ≥ S2). MRE showed higher specificity for predicting all stages of HF compared to DWI. Conclusions: MRE more strongly correlated with the HF stages than DWI and is more specific in predicting all HF stages.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=5;spage=620;epage=625;aulast=ZouDiffusion-weighted Imaging; Hepatic Fibrosis; Liver Stiffness; Magnetic Resonance Elastography; Stage
spellingShingle Li-Qiu Zou
Jie Chen
Liang Pan
Jin-Zhao Jiang
Wei Xing
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
Chinese Medical Journal
Diffusion-weighted Imaging; Hepatic Fibrosis; Liver Stiffness; Magnetic Resonance Elastography; Stage
title Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_full Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_short Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_sort comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion weighted imaging for staging hepatic fibrosis
topic Diffusion-weighted Imaging; Hepatic Fibrosis; Liver Stiffness; Magnetic Resonance Elastography; Stage
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=5;spage=620;epage=625;aulast=Zou
work_keys_str_mv AT liqiuzou comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT jiechen comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT liangpan comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT jinzhaojiang comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT weixing comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis