Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines

The aviation sector is facing a massive change in terms of replacing the currently used fossil jet fuels (Jet A, JP5, etc.) with non-fossil jet fuels from sustainable feedstocks. This involves several challenges and, among them, we have the fundamental issue of current jet engines being developed fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arvid Åkerblom, Francesco Pignatelli, Christer Fureby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/9/12/838
_version_ 1797462001511825408
author Arvid Åkerblom
Francesco Pignatelli
Christer Fureby
author_facet Arvid Åkerblom
Francesco Pignatelli
Christer Fureby
author_sort Arvid Åkerblom
collection DOAJ
description The aviation sector is facing a massive change in terms of replacing the currently used fossil jet fuels (Jet A, JP5, etc.) with non-fossil jet fuels from sustainable feedstocks. This involves several challenges and, among them, we have the fundamental issue of current jet engines being developed for the existing fossil jet fuels. To facilitate such a transformation, we need to investigate the sensitivity of jet engines to other fuels, having a wider range of thermophysical specifications. The combustion process is particularly important and difficult to characterize with respect to fuel characteristics. In this study, we examine premixed and pre-vaporized combustion of dodecane, Jet A, and a synthetic test fuel, C1, based on the alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) certified pathway behind an equilateral bluff-body flameholder, spray combustion of Jet A and C1 in a laboratory combustor, and spray combustion of Jet A and C1 in a single-sector model of a helicopter engine by means of numerical simulations. A finite rate chemistry (FRC) large eddy simulation (LES) approach is adopted and used together with small comprehensive reaction mechanisms of around 300 reversible reactions. Comparison with experimental data is performed for the bluff-body flameholder and laboratory combustor configurations. Good agreement is generally observed, and small to marginal differences in combustion behavior are observed between the different fuels.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:27:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d86266a5ecf74e248c7715976090c56e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-4310
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:27:23Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj.art-d86266a5ecf74e248c7715976090c56e2023-11-24T12:38:52ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102022-12-0191283810.3390/aerospace9120838Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet EnginesArvid Åkerblom0Francesco Pignatelli1Christer Fureby2Department of Energy Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, SE 221-00 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Energy Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, SE 221-00 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Energy Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, SE 221-00 Lund, SwedenThe aviation sector is facing a massive change in terms of replacing the currently used fossil jet fuels (Jet A, JP5, etc.) with non-fossil jet fuels from sustainable feedstocks. This involves several challenges and, among them, we have the fundamental issue of current jet engines being developed for the existing fossil jet fuels. To facilitate such a transformation, we need to investigate the sensitivity of jet engines to other fuels, having a wider range of thermophysical specifications. The combustion process is particularly important and difficult to characterize with respect to fuel characteristics. In this study, we examine premixed and pre-vaporized combustion of dodecane, Jet A, and a synthetic test fuel, C1, based on the alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) certified pathway behind an equilateral bluff-body flameholder, spray combustion of Jet A and C1 in a laboratory combustor, and spray combustion of Jet A and C1 in a single-sector model of a helicopter engine by means of numerical simulations. A finite rate chemistry (FRC) large eddy simulation (LES) approach is adopted and used together with small comprehensive reaction mechanisms of around 300 reversible reactions. Comparison with experimental data is performed for the bluff-body flameholder and laboratory combustor configurations. Good agreement is generally observed, and small to marginal differences in combustion behavior are observed between the different fuels.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/9/12/838large eddy simulationspray combustionfossil and non-fossil fuelsSAFvalidation and flow elucidation
spellingShingle Arvid Åkerblom
Francesco Pignatelli
Christer Fureby
Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines
Aerospace
large eddy simulation
spray combustion
fossil and non-fossil fuels
SAF
validation and flow elucidation
title Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines
title_full Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines
title_fullStr Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines
title_short Numerical Simulations of Spray Combustion in Jet Engines
title_sort numerical simulations of spray combustion in jet engines
topic large eddy simulation
spray combustion
fossil and non-fossil fuels
SAF
validation and flow elucidation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/9/12/838
work_keys_str_mv AT arvidakerblom numericalsimulationsofspraycombustioninjetengines
AT francescopignatelli numericalsimulationsofspraycombustioninjetengines
AT christerfureby numericalsimulationsofspraycombustioninjetengines