Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux

Scholars have increasingly urged researchers to evaluate prior findings through replication studies that can help test, refine, and extend claims made in previous research. We agree that this is an important aspect of social science that deliberative scholarship has underutilized. To help fill this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Genevieve Fuji Johnson, Laura W Black, Michael E. Morrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Westminster Press 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Deliberative Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1043/
_version_ 1811209311927402496
author Genevieve Fuji Johnson
Laura W Black
Michael E. Morrell
author_facet Genevieve Fuji Johnson
Laura W Black
Michael E. Morrell
author_sort Genevieve Fuji Johnson
collection DOAJ
description Scholars have increasingly urged researchers to evaluate prior findings through replication studies that can help test, refine, and extend claims made in previous research. We agree that this is an important aspect of social science that deliberative scholarship has underutilized. To help fill this lacunae, we test our previous findings from an analysis of data from Citizen Initiative Reviews (CIRs) in 2016 by replicating our methodology on data from CIRs in 2018. We set out to determine if the patterns we discovered earlier and developed into the Deliberative Procedures Frame theory appeared again in 2018 CIRs. We find repeating across the two sets of data, including consistent levels of enthusiasm, slow rising happiness, and the relationships between certain emotions on the final day and participants’ evaluations of deliberative quality, and these indicate that our theory remains a viable explanation for emotions in mini-public deliberation. We remain confident that the sources of anger and frustration identified in our previous analysis remains correct. On the basis of this replication, we clarify that what we call the Procedures Frame enables the identification of the most likely time points during deliberation when the threat to democratic legitimacy and the risk to quality deliberation will most likely arise and result in expressions of emotion. Finally, our study reinforces how important deliberative design is to the role of emotions in the success of mini-publics.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:37:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d86938354d484a89997ef17b694537de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2634-0488
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:37:21Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher University of Westminster Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Deliberative Democracy
spelling doaj.art-d86938354d484a89997ef17b694537de2022-12-22T03:47:46ZengUniversity of Westminster PressJournal of Deliberative Democracy2634-04882022-03-0118210.16997/jdd.1043Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review ReduxGenevieve Fuji Johnson0Laura W Black1Michael E. Morrell2Simon Fraser UniversityOhio University Scholars have increasingly urged researchers to evaluate prior findings through replication studies that can help test, refine, and extend claims made in previous research. We agree that this is an important aspect of social science that deliberative scholarship has underutilized. To help fill this lacunae, we test our previous findings from an analysis of data from Citizen Initiative Reviews (CIRs) in 2016 by replicating our methodology on data from CIRs in 2018. We set out to determine if the patterns we discovered earlier and developed into the Deliberative Procedures Frame theory appeared again in 2018 CIRs. We find repeating across the two sets of data, including consistent levels of enthusiasm, slow rising happiness, and the relationships between certain emotions on the final day and participants’ evaluations of deliberative quality, and these indicate that our theory remains a viable explanation for emotions in mini-public deliberation. We remain confident that the sources of anger and frustration identified in our previous analysis remains correct. On the basis of this replication, we clarify that what we call the Procedures Frame enables the identification of the most likely time points during deliberation when the threat to democratic legitimacy and the risk to quality deliberation will most likely arise and result in expressions of emotion. Finally, our study reinforces how important deliberative design is to the role of emotions in the success of mini-publics.https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1043/deliberationdeliberative democracyreplicationemotionmini-public
spellingShingle Genevieve Fuji Johnson
Laura W Black
Michael E. Morrell
Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux
Journal of Deliberative Democracy
deliberation
deliberative democracy
replication
emotion
mini-public
title Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux
title_full Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux
title_fullStr Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux
title_full_unstemmed Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux
title_short Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux
title_sort mini public replication emotions and deliberation in the citizens initiative review redux
topic deliberation
deliberative democracy
replication
emotion
mini-public
url https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1043/
work_keys_str_mv AT genevievefujijohnson minipublicreplicationemotionsanddeliberationinthecitizensinitiativereviewredux
AT laurawblack minipublicreplicationemotionsanddeliberationinthecitizensinitiativereviewredux
AT michaelemorrell minipublicreplicationemotionsanddeliberationinthecitizensinitiativereviewredux