Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures

Improvements in sensor technology in recent decades led to the creation of ground, air and space imaging systems, whose data can be used in archaeological studies. Greece is one of the lucky areas that are rich in archaeological heritage. The detection of prehistoric/historic undiscovered constructi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dimitrios Kaimaris, Petros Patias, Maria Tsakiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012-06-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982311000366
_version_ 1818422774638575616
author Dimitrios Kaimaris
Petros Patias
Maria Tsakiri
author_facet Dimitrios Kaimaris
Petros Patias
Maria Tsakiri
author_sort Dimitrios Kaimaris
collection DOAJ
description Improvements in sensor technology in recent decades led to the creation of ground, air and space imaging systems, whose data can be used in archaeological studies. Greece is one of the lucky areas that are rich in archaeological heritage. The detection of prehistoric/historic undiscovered constructions on satellite images or aerial photos is a complex and complicated matter. These marks are not visible from the ground, they can, however, be traced on satellite or aerial images, because of the differences in tone and texture. These differences appear as crop, soil and shadow marks. Undoubtedly, the detection of buried structures requires a suitable spatial resolution image, taken under appropriate meteorological conditions and during the best period of the vegetation growing cycle. According to the pertinent literature, detecting covered memorials may be achieved either accidentally or, usually, after a systematic investigation based on historical narratives. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors that facilitate or hinder the detection of buried structures through high spatial resolution satellite imagery. In this study, pan sharpened images from the QuickBird-2 satellite were used, of a spatial resolution of 0.60-0.70 m. This study concerns the detection of marks of the ancient Via Egnatia, from the ancient Amphipolis to Philippi (Eastern Macedonia, Greece). We studied different types of vegetation in the region and their phenological cycle. Taking into account the vegetation phenological cycle of the study area as well as the meteorological data, four pan sharpened QuickBird-2 images of a spatial resolution of 0.60–0.70 m. were used, during four different seasons. By processing the four images, we can determine the one acquired during the most appropriate conditions for the detection of buried structures. The application of this methodology in the study area had positive results, and not only was the main purpose of this study – the detection of parts of the ancient Via Egnatia – achieved, but the locations of dozens of other buried archaeological remains were also determined.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T13:31:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8765c9586894034ae58c2eb0640cd53
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-9823
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T13:31:36Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d8765c9586894034ae58c2eb0640cd532022-12-21T22:59:42ZengElsevierEgyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences1110-98232012-06-0115191810.1016/j.ejrs.2011.12.001Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structuresDimitrios Kaimaris0Petros Patias1Maria Tsakiri2School of Urban-Regional Planning and Development Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreeceSchool of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Department of Cadastre, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreeceSchool of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Department of Cadastre, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreeceImprovements in sensor technology in recent decades led to the creation of ground, air and space imaging systems, whose data can be used in archaeological studies. Greece is one of the lucky areas that are rich in archaeological heritage. The detection of prehistoric/historic undiscovered constructions on satellite images or aerial photos is a complex and complicated matter. These marks are not visible from the ground, they can, however, be traced on satellite or aerial images, because of the differences in tone and texture. These differences appear as crop, soil and shadow marks. Undoubtedly, the detection of buried structures requires a suitable spatial resolution image, taken under appropriate meteorological conditions and during the best period of the vegetation growing cycle. According to the pertinent literature, detecting covered memorials may be achieved either accidentally or, usually, after a systematic investigation based on historical narratives. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors that facilitate or hinder the detection of buried structures through high spatial resolution satellite imagery. In this study, pan sharpened images from the QuickBird-2 satellite were used, of a spatial resolution of 0.60-0.70 m. This study concerns the detection of marks of the ancient Via Egnatia, from the ancient Amphipolis to Philippi (Eastern Macedonia, Greece). We studied different types of vegetation in the region and their phenological cycle. Taking into account the vegetation phenological cycle of the study area as well as the meteorological data, four pan sharpened QuickBird-2 images of a spatial resolution of 0.60–0.70 m. were used, during four different seasons. By processing the four images, we can determine the one acquired during the most appropriate conditions for the detection of buried structures. The application of this methodology in the study area had positive results, and not only was the main purpose of this study – the detection of parts of the ancient Via Egnatia – achieved, but the locations of dozens of other buried archaeological remains were also determined.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982311000366High spatial resolution satellite imageBuried structuresCrop-soil-marksBest meteorological conditionsBest time for data for the detection of buried structures
spellingShingle Dimitrios Kaimaris
Petros Patias
Maria Tsakiri
Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
High spatial resolution satellite image
Buried structures
Crop-soil-marks
Best meteorological conditions
Best time for data for the detection of buried structures
title Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
title_full Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
title_fullStr Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
title_full_unstemmed Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
title_short Best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
title_sort best period for high spatial resolution satellite images for the detection of marks of buried structures
topic High spatial resolution satellite image
Buried structures
Crop-soil-marks
Best meteorological conditions
Best time for data for the detection of buried structures
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982311000366
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrioskaimaris bestperiodforhighspatialresolutionsatelliteimagesforthedetectionofmarksofburiedstructures
AT petrospatias bestperiodforhighspatialresolutionsatelliteimagesforthedetectionofmarksofburiedstructures
AT mariatsakiri bestperiodforhighspatialresolutionsatelliteimagesforthedetectionofmarksofburiedstructures