Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression
Abstract Tumor development and metastasis are facilitated by the complex interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment, which comprises stromal cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, among other factors. Stromal cells can adopt new phenotypes to promote tumor cell invasion....
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-05-01
|
| Series: | Cancer Communications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12416 |
| _version_ | 1797829303236296704 |
|---|---|
| author | Anshika Goenka Fatima Khan Bhupender Verma Priyanka Sinha Crismita C. Dmello Manasi P. Jogalekar Prakash Gangadaran Byeong‐Cheol Ahn |
| author_facet | Anshika Goenka Fatima Khan Bhupender Verma Priyanka Sinha Crismita C. Dmello Manasi P. Jogalekar Prakash Gangadaran Byeong‐Cheol Ahn |
| author_sort | Anshika Goenka |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Tumor development and metastasis are facilitated by the complex interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment, which comprises stromal cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, among other factors. Stromal cells can adopt new phenotypes to promote tumor cell invasion. A deep understanding of the signaling pathways involved in cell‐to‐cell and cell‐to‐ECM interactions is needed to design effective intervention strategies that might interrupt these interactions. In this review, we describe the tumor microenvironment (TME) components and associated therapeutics. We discuss the clinical advances in the prevalent and newly discovered signaling pathways in the TME, the immune checkpoints and immunosuppressive chemokines, and currently used inhibitors targeting these pathways. These include both intrinsic and non‐autonomous tumor cell signaling pathways in the TME: protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, Notch, and transforming growth factor (TGF‐β) signaling, Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress response, lactate signaling, Metabolic reprogramming, cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS)–stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and Siglec signaling pathways. We also discuss the recent advances in Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD‐1), Cytotoxic T‐Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), T‐cell immunoglobulin mucin‐3 (TIM‐3) and Lymphocyte Activating Gene 3 (LAG3) immune checkpoint inhibitors along with the C‐C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)‐ C‐C class chemokines 22 (CCL22)/ and 17 (CCL17), C‐C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)‐ chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), C‐C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)‐ chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 3 (CCL3) chemokine signaling axis in the TME. In addition, this review provides a holistic understanding of the TME as we discuss the three‐dimensional and microfluidic models of the TME, which are believed to recapitulate the original characteristics of the patient tumor and hence may be used as a platform to study new mechanisms and screen for various anti‐cancer therapies. We further discuss the systemic influences of gut microbiota in TME reprogramming and treatment response. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the diverse and most critical signaling pathways in the TME, highlighting the associated newest and critical preclinical and clinical studies along with their underlying biology. We highlight the importance of the most recent technologies of microfluidics and lab‐on‐chip models for TME research and also present an overview of extrinsic factors, such as the inhabitant human microbiome, which have the potential to modulate TME biology and drug responses. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T13:18:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d8791161e3824e2a8f6f16b55281fab8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2523-3548 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T13:18:19Z |
| publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cancer Communications |
| spelling | doaj.art-d8791161e3824e2a8f6f16b55281fab82023-05-11T15:21:49ZengWileyCancer Communications2523-35482023-05-0143552556110.1002/cac2.12416Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progressionAnshika Goenka0Fatima Khan1Bhupender Verma2Priyanka Sinha3Crismita C. Dmello4Manasi P. Jogalekar5Prakash Gangadaran6Byeong‐Cheol Ahn7The Ken & Ruth Davee Department of Neurology The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, 60611 IL USADepartment of Neurological Surgery Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago, 60611 IL USADepartment of Ophthalmology Schepens Eye Research Institute Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Harvard Medical School Boston, 02114 MA USADepartment of Neurology MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Charlestown, 02129 MA USADepartment of Neurological Surgery Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago, 60611 IL USAHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California San Francisco San Francisco, 94143 CA USABK21 FOUR KNU Convergence Educational Program of Biomedical Sciences for Creative Future Talents Department of Biomedical Science, School of Medicine Kyungpook National University Daegu, 41944 South KoreaBK21 FOUR KNU Convergence Educational Program of Biomedical Sciences for Creative Future Talents Department of Biomedical Science, School of Medicine Kyungpook National University Daegu, 41944 South KoreaAbstract Tumor development and metastasis are facilitated by the complex interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment, which comprises stromal cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, among other factors. Stromal cells can adopt new phenotypes to promote tumor cell invasion. A deep understanding of the signaling pathways involved in cell‐to‐cell and cell‐to‐ECM interactions is needed to design effective intervention strategies that might interrupt these interactions. In this review, we describe the tumor microenvironment (TME) components and associated therapeutics. We discuss the clinical advances in the prevalent and newly discovered signaling pathways in the TME, the immune checkpoints and immunosuppressive chemokines, and currently used inhibitors targeting these pathways. These include both intrinsic and non‐autonomous tumor cell signaling pathways in the TME: protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, Notch, and transforming growth factor (TGF‐β) signaling, Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress response, lactate signaling, Metabolic reprogramming, cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS)–stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and Siglec signaling pathways. We also discuss the recent advances in Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD‐1), Cytotoxic T‐Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), T‐cell immunoglobulin mucin‐3 (TIM‐3) and Lymphocyte Activating Gene 3 (LAG3) immune checkpoint inhibitors along with the C‐C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)‐ C‐C class chemokines 22 (CCL22)/ and 17 (CCL17), C‐C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)‐ chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), C‐C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)‐ chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 3 (CCL3) chemokine signaling axis in the TME. In addition, this review provides a holistic understanding of the TME as we discuss the three‐dimensional and microfluidic models of the TME, which are believed to recapitulate the original characteristics of the patient tumor and hence may be used as a platform to study new mechanisms and screen for various anti‐cancer therapies. We further discuss the systemic influences of gut microbiota in TME reprogramming and treatment response. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the diverse and most critical signaling pathways in the TME, highlighting the associated newest and critical preclinical and clinical studies along with their underlying biology. We highlight the importance of the most recent technologies of microfluidics and lab‐on‐chip models for TME research and also present an overview of extrinsic factors, such as the inhabitant human microbiome, which have the potential to modulate TME biology and drug responses.https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.124163D‐modelcancer therapygut microbiotaimmune signalingmetabolismsignaling |
| spellingShingle | Anshika Goenka Fatima Khan Bhupender Verma Priyanka Sinha Crismita C. Dmello Manasi P. Jogalekar Prakash Gangadaran Byeong‐Cheol Ahn Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression Cancer Communications 3D‐model cancer therapy gut microbiota immune signaling metabolism signaling |
| title | Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression |
| title_full | Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression |
| title_fullStr | Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression |
| title_short | Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression |
| title_sort | tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression |
| topic | 3D‐model cancer therapy gut microbiota immune signaling metabolism signaling |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12416 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anshikagoenka tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT fatimakhan tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT bhupenderverma tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT priyankasinha tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT crismitacdmello tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT manasipjogalekar tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT prakashgangadaran tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression AT byeongcheolahn tumormicroenvironmentsignalingandtherapeuticsincancerprogression |