Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia of the heart with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial flutter, another arrhythmia, occurs less often with an incidence of approximately 200,000 new patients per year in the USA. Patients with atrial fibri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naqash J. Sethi, Sanam Safi, Joshua Feinberg, Emil E. Nielsen, Christian Gluud, Janus C. Jakobsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0470-2
_version_ 1811218664832106496
author Naqash J. Sethi
Sanam Safi
Joshua Feinberg
Emil E. Nielsen
Christian Gluud
Janus C. Jakobsen
author_facet Naqash J. Sethi
Sanam Safi
Joshua Feinberg
Emil E. Nielsen
Christian Gluud
Janus C. Jakobsen
author_sort Naqash J. Sethi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia of the heart with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial flutter, another arrhythmia, occurs less often with an incidence of approximately 200,000 new patients per year in the USA. Patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter have an increased risk of death and morbidities. In the management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, it is often necessary to use medical interventions to lower the heart rate. Lowering the heart rate may theoretically prevent the development of heart failure and tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. The evidence on the benefits and harms of digoxin compared with placebo or with other medical interventions is unclear. This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the beneficial and harmful effects of digoxin compared with placebo, no intervention, or with other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Methods This protocol for a systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane and the eight-step assessment procedure suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues. We plan to include all relevant randomised clinical trials comparing digoxin with placebo, no intervention, or with other medical interventions. We plan to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded on Web of Science, and BIOSIS to identify relevant trials. Any eligible trial will be assessed and classified as either at high risk of bias or low risk of bias, and our primary conclusions will be based on trials with low risk of bias. We will perform our meta-analyses of the extracted data using Review Manager 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis ver. 0.9.5.5 beta. For both our primary and secondary outcomes, we will create a ‘Summary of Findings’ table based on GRADE assessments of the quality of the evidence. Discussion The results of this systematic review have the potential to benefit millions of patients worldwide as well as healthcare economy. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016052935
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:13:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d89940e9199b4cf4995c961bb5d1bebe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:13:12Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-d89940e9199b4cf4995c961bb5d1bebe2022-12-22T03:42:35ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532017-04-016111410.1186/s13643-017-0470-2Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential AnalysisNaqash J. Sethi0Sanam Safi1Joshua Feinberg2Emil E. Nielsen3Christian Gluud4Janus C. Jakobsen5Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAbstract Background Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia of the heart with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial flutter, another arrhythmia, occurs less often with an incidence of approximately 200,000 new patients per year in the USA. Patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter have an increased risk of death and morbidities. In the management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, it is often necessary to use medical interventions to lower the heart rate. Lowering the heart rate may theoretically prevent the development of heart failure and tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. The evidence on the benefits and harms of digoxin compared with placebo or with other medical interventions is unclear. This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the beneficial and harmful effects of digoxin compared with placebo, no intervention, or with other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Methods This protocol for a systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane and the eight-step assessment procedure suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues. We plan to include all relevant randomised clinical trials comparing digoxin with placebo, no intervention, or with other medical interventions. We plan to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded on Web of Science, and BIOSIS to identify relevant trials. Any eligible trial will be assessed and classified as either at high risk of bias or low risk of bias, and our primary conclusions will be based on trials with low risk of bias. We will perform our meta-analyses of the extracted data using Review Manager 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis ver. 0.9.5.5 beta. For both our primary and secondary outcomes, we will create a ‘Summary of Findings’ table based on GRADE assessments of the quality of the evidence. Discussion The results of this systematic review have the potential to benefit millions of patients worldwide as well as healthcare economy. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016052935http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0470-2Atrial fibrillationAtrial flutterDigoxinMedical therapySystematic reviewMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Naqash J. Sethi
Sanam Safi
Joshua Feinberg
Emil E. Nielsen
Christian Gluud
Janus C. Jakobsen
Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Systematic Reviews
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial flutter
Digoxin
Medical therapy
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
title Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_fullStr Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_short Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_sort digoxin versus placebo no intervention or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter a protocol for a systematic review with meta analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic Atrial fibrillation
Atrial flutter
Digoxin
Medical therapy
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0470-2
work_keys_str_mv AT naqashjsethi digoxinversusplacebonointerventionorothermedicalinterventionsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutteraprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT sanamsafi digoxinversusplacebonointerventionorothermedicalinterventionsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutteraprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT joshuafeinberg digoxinversusplacebonointerventionorothermedicalinterventionsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutteraprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT emilenielsen digoxinversusplacebonointerventionorothermedicalinterventionsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutteraprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT christiangluud digoxinversusplacebonointerventionorothermedicalinterventionsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutteraprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT januscjakobsen digoxinversusplacebonointerventionorothermedicalinterventionsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutteraprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis