YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?

According to statistics, the number of young people aged 15 to 29 in the Baltic States has decreased considerably in the past decade. As this age group is around one sixth of the population in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, this trend is significant, and represents a risk from a demographic, nation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mare Leino, Vija Dislere, Odeta Merfeldaitė, Jolanta Pivorienė, Asta Railienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mykolas Romeris University 2023-06-01
Series:Social Inquiry into Well-Being
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/social-inquiry-into-well-being/article/view/7651
_version_ 1797796959880216576
author Mare Leino
Vija Dislere
Odeta Merfeldaitė
Jolanta Pivorienė
Asta Railienė
author_facet Mare Leino
Vija Dislere
Odeta Merfeldaitė
Jolanta Pivorienė
Asta Railienė
author_sort Mare Leino
collection DOAJ
description According to statistics, the number of young people aged 15 to 29 in the Baltic States has decreased considerably in the past decade. As this age group is around one sixth of the population in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, this trend is significant, and represents a risk from a demographic, nationality, security, and financial point of view. The population of the Baltic States is currently subject to a higher risk of multidimensional poverty than the populations of other EU countries (Voronov et al., 2020). Moving out of these countries is not forbidden, but in an ideal world young people would return, which is not always the case. As migration processes can be influenced proactively, in this article the authors analyze the situation and consider what could be done to maintain wellbeing, to keep the younger generation in their home countries, and/or to attract them to return. Empirical data comes from secondary data analysis: the authors conducted a content analysis of two published reports. The aim is to focus on wellbeing and social-pedagogical prevention to find answers to two questions: what influences emigration readiness, and can certain activities prevent emigration? As a conclusion of our analysis, the following is stressed: sometimes leaving is a tool for hope/attaining something better – for higher quality of wellbeing, for example; however, some people just want to get away – they leave for the sake of leaving. Both cases may be problematic – a social pedagogical preventive consultation could avoid larger crises. The proactive approach may help to keep younger generations in the home country and/or support their readiness to come back after study abroad.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:40:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8a9d89e706c4382b7acded1e035e4b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2783-5502
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:40:59Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Mykolas Romeris University
record_format Article
series Social Inquiry into Well-Being
spelling doaj.art-d8a9d89e706c4382b7acded1e035e4b62023-06-23T08:28:16ZengMykolas Romeris UniversitySocial Inquiry into Well-Being2783-55022023-06-0121110.13165/SD-23-21-1-01 YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?Mare LeinoVija DislereOdeta MerfeldaitėJolanta PivorienėAsta RailienėAccording to statistics, the number of young people aged 15 to 29 in the Baltic States has decreased considerably in the past decade. As this age group is around one sixth of the population in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, this trend is significant, and represents a risk from a demographic, nationality, security, and financial point of view. The population of the Baltic States is currently subject to a higher risk of multidimensional poverty than the populations of other EU countries (Voronov et al., 2020). Moving out of these countries is not forbidden, but in an ideal world young people would return, which is not always the case. As migration processes can be influenced proactively, in this article the authors analyze the situation and consider what could be done to maintain wellbeing, to keep the younger generation in their home countries, and/or to attract them to return. Empirical data comes from secondary data analysis: the authors conducted a content analysis of two published reports. The aim is to focus on wellbeing and social-pedagogical prevention to find answers to two questions: what influences emigration readiness, and can certain activities prevent emigration? As a conclusion of our analysis, the following is stressed: sometimes leaving is a tool for hope/attaining something better – for higher quality of wellbeing, for example; however, some people just want to get away – they leave for the sake of leaving. Both cases may be problematic – a social pedagogical preventive consultation could avoid larger crises. The proactive approach may help to keep younger generations in the home country and/or support their readiness to come back after study abroad. https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/social-inquiry-into-well-being/article/view/7651the baltic statesemigrationsocial problemswellbeingyouth
spellingShingle Mare Leino
Vija Dislere
Odeta Merfeldaitė
Jolanta Pivorienė
Asta Railienė
YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?
Social Inquiry into Well-Being
the baltic states
emigration
social problems
wellbeing
youth
title YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?
title_full YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?
title_fullStr YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?
title_full_unstemmed YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?
title_short YOUTH IN THE BALTIC STATES – LEAVING OR NOT?
title_sort youth in the baltic states leaving or not
topic the baltic states
emigration
social problems
wellbeing
youth
url https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/social-inquiry-into-well-being/article/view/7651
work_keys_str_mv AT mareleino youthinthebalticstatesleavingornot
AT vijadislere youthinthebalticstatesleavingornot
AT odetamerfeldaite youthinthebalticstatesleavingornot
AT jolantapivoriene youthinthebalticstatesleavingornot
AT astarailiene youthinthebalticstatesleavingornot