Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting

Abstract Background and Aim Some studies have found a positive association between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and metabolic syndrome; however, none are from India. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study of 1040 adults aged between 18 and 50 years. Individuals from the annual health check‐u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narendra S Javadekar, Gauri A Oka, Ashwini S Joshi, Parag Vaste, Sandeep Tamane, Parimal S Lawate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:JGH Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12639
_version_ 1819299271928709120
author Narendra S Javadekar
Gauri A Oka
Ashwini S Joshi
Parag Vaste
Sandeep Tamane
Parimal S Lawate
author_facet Narendra S Javadekar
Gauri A Oka
Ashwini S Joshi
Parag Vaste
Sandeep Tamane
Parimal S Lawate
author_sort Narendra S Javadekar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aim Some studies have found a positive association between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and metabolic syndrome; however, none are from India. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study of 1040 adults aged between 18 and 50 years. Individuals from the annual health check‐up setting were screened using anthropometry and biochemistry. Based on the results, they were identified as with and without metabolic syndrome. We excluded individuals who were already diagnosed with metabolic syndrome or those who were already on medication for diabetes mellitus or hypertension or dyslipidemia. All the participants were administered the Rome III questionnaire for the diagnosis of IBS. Results Metabolic syndrome was found in 307 of 1040 (29.5%) while 33 of 1040 (3.2%) had IBS. The proportion of IBS was not significantly different between participants with and without metabolic syndrome (1.6% vs 3.8% respectively; P = 0.06). Those with IBS had significantly greater mean weight (72.4 vs 67.2 kg; P = 0.009), mean waist circumference (88.8 vs 85.2 cm; P = 0.011), mean body mass index (BMI) (26.2 vs 24.2 kg/m2; P = 0.002), and higher mean fasting glucose (96 vs 89 mg/dL; P < 0.000) respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and IBS are comparable to previous literature from India. There was no association between metabolic syndrome and IBS.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T05:43:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8ab3377027a42bab39c60fdaba5b679
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2397-9070
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T05:43:09Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JGH Open
spelling doaj.art-d8ab3377027a42bab39c60fdaba5b6792022-12-21T17:12:45ZengWileyJGH Open2397-90702021-10-015101148115310.1002/jgh3.12639Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up settingNarendra S Javadekar0Gauri A Oka1Ashwini S Joshi2Parag Vaste3Sandeep Tamane4Parimal S Lawate5Department of Medicine Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune IndiaDepartment of Research Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune IndiaDepartment of Medicine Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune IndiaDepartment of Medicine Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune IndiaDepartment of Medicine Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune IndiaDepartment of Gastroenterology Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune IndiaAbstract Background and Aim Some studies have found a positive association between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and metabolic syndrome; however, none are from India. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study of 1040 adults aged between 18 and 50 years. Individuals from the annual health check‐up setting were screened using anthropometry and biochemistry. Based on the results, they were identified as with and without metabolic syndrome. We excluded individuals who were already diagnosed with metabolic syndrome or those who were already on medication for diabetes mellitus or hypertension or dyslipidemia. All the participants were administered the Rome III questionnaire for the diagnosis of IBS. Results Metabolic syndrome was found in 307 of 1040 (29.5%) while 33 of 1040 (3.2%) had IBS. The proportion of IBS was not significantly different between participants with and without metabolic syndrome (1.6% vs 3.8% respectively; P = 0.06). Those with IBS had significantly greater mean weight (72.4 vs 67.2 kg; P = 0.009), mean waist circumference (88.8 vs 85.2 cm; P = 0.011), mean body mass index (BMI) (26.2 vs 24.2 kg/m2; P = 0.002), and higher mean fasting glucose (96 vs 89 mg/dL; P < 0.000) respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and IBS are comparable to previous literature from India. There was no association between metabolic syndrome and IBS.https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12639irritable bowel syndromemetabolic syndromeRome III
spellingShingle Narendra S Javadekar
Gauri A Oka
Ashwini S Joshi
Parag Vaste
Sandeep Tamane
Parimal S Lawate
Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting
JGH Open
irritable bowel syndrome
metabolic syndrome
Rome III
title Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting
title_full Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting
title_fullStr Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting
title_short Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check‐up setting
title_sort prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome among young adults in an annual health check up setting
topic irritable bowel syndrome
metabolic syndrome
Rome III
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12639
work_keys_str_mv AT narendrasjavadekar prevalenceofirritablebowelsyndromeandmetabolicsyndromeamongyoungadultsinanannualhealthcheckupsetting
AT gauriaoka prevalenceofirritablebowelsyndromeandmetabolicsyndromeamongyoungadultsinanannualhealthcheckupsetting
AT ashwinisjoshi prevalenceofirritablebowelsyndromeandmetabolicsyndromeamongyoungadultsinanannualhealthcheckupsetting
AT paragvaste prevalenceofirritablebowelsyndromeandmetabolicsyndromeamongyoungadultsinanannualhealthcheckupsetting
AT sandeeptamane prevalenceofirritablebowelsyndromeandmetabolicsyndromeamongyoungadultsinanannualhealthcheckupsetting
AT parimalslawate prevalenceofirritablebowelsyndromeandmetabolicsyndromeamongyoungadultsinanannualhealthcheckupsetting