Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation

Determining the role of different precipitation periods for peak discharge generation is crucial for both projecting future changes in flood probability and for short- and medium-range flood forecasting. In this study, catchment-averaged daily precipitation time series are analyzed prior to annual p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Froidevaux, J. Schwanbeck, R. Weingartner, C. Chevalier, O. Martius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-09-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/3903/2015/hess-19-3903-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818175378541248512
author P. Froidevaux
J. Schwanbeck
R. Weingartner
C. Chevalier
O. Martius
author_facet P. Froidevaux
J. Schwanbeck
R. Weingartner
C. Chevalier
O. Martius
author_sort P. Froidevaux
collection DOAJ
description Determining the role of different precipitation periods for peak discharge generation is crucial for both projecting future changes in flood probability and for short- and medium-range flood forecasting. In this study, catchment-averaged daily precipitation time series are analyzed prior to annual peak discharge events (floods) in Switzerland. The high number of floods considered – more than 4000 events from 101 catchments have been analyzed – allows to derive significant information about the role of antecedent precipitation for peak discharge generation. Based on the analysis of precipitation times series, a new separation of flood-related precipitation periods is proposed: (i) the period 0 to 1 day before flood days, when the maximum flood-triggering precipitation rates are generally observed, (ii) the period 2 to 3 days before flood days, when longer-lasting synoptic situations generate "significantly higher than normal" precipitation amounts, and (iii) the period from 4 days to 1 month before flood days when previous wet episodes may have already preconditioned the catchment. The novelty of this study lies in the separation of antecedent precipitation into the precursor antecedent precipitation (4 days before floods or earlier, called PRE-AP) and the short range precipitation (0 to 3 days before floods, a period when precipitation is often driven by one persistent weather situation like e.g., a stationary low-pressure system). A precise separation of "antecedent" and "peak-triggering" precipitation is not attempted. Instead, the strict definition of antecedent precipitation periods permits a direct comparison of all catchments. <br><br> The precipitation accumulating 0 to 3 days before an event is the most relevant for floods in Switzerland. PRE-AP precipitation has only a weak and region-specific influence on flood probability. Floods were significantly more frequent after wet PRE-AP periods only in the Jura Mountains, in the western and eastern Swiss plateau, and at the outlet of large lakes. As a general rule, wet PRE-AP periods enhance the flood probability in catchments with gentle topography, high infiltration rates, and large storage capacity (karstic cavities, deep soils, large reservoirs). In contrast, floods were significantly less frequent after wet PRE-AP periods in glacial catchments because of reduced melt. <br><br> For the majority of catchments however, no significant correlation between precipitation amounts and flood occurrences is found when the last 3 days before floods are omitted in the precipitation amounts. Moreover, the PRE-AP was not higher for extreme floods than for annual floods with a high frequency and was very close to climatology for all floods. The fact that floods are not significantly more frequent nor more intense after wet PRE-AP is a clear indicator of a short discharge memory of Pre-Alpine, Alpine and South Alpine Swiss catchments. Our study poses the question whether the impact of long-term precursory precipitation for floods in such catchments is not overestimated in the general perception. The results suggest that the consideration of a 3–4 days precipitation period should be sufficient to represent (understand, reconstruct, model, project) Swiss Alpine floods.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T19:59:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8ababdbf8cc4a9fb5aadaee1485a032
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T19:59:21Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d8ababdbf8cc4a9fb5aadaee1485a0322022-12-22T00:52:34ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382015-09-011993903392410.5194/hess-19-3903-2015Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitationP. Froidevaux0J. Schwanbeck1R. Weingartner2C. Chevalier3O. Martius4Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research and Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandOeschger Centre for Climate Change Research and Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandOeschger Centre for Climate Change Research and Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandOeschger Centre for Climate Change Research and Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandOeschger Centre for Climate Change Research and Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDetermining the role of different precipitation periods for peak discharge generation is crucial for both projecting future changes in flood probability and for short- and medium-range flood forecasting. In this study, catchment-averaged daily precipitation time series are analyzed prior to annual peak discharge events (floods) in Switzerland. The high number of floods considered – more than 4000 events from 101 catchments have been analyzed – allows to derive significant information about the role of antecedent precipitation for peak discharge generation. Based on the analysis of precipitation times series, a new separation of flood-related precipitation periods is proposed: (i) the period 0 to 1 day before flood days, when the maximum flood-triggering precipitation rates are generally observed, (ii) the period 2 to 3 days before flood days, when longer-lasting synoptic situations generate "significantly higher than normal" precipitation amounts, and (iii) the period from 4 days to 1 month before flood days when previous wet episodes may have already preconditioned the catchment. The novelty of this study lies in the separation of antecedent precipitation into the precursor antecedent precipitation (4 days before floods or earlier, called PRE-AP) and the short range precipitation (0 to 3 days before floods, a period when precipitation is often driven by one persistent weather situation like e.g., a stationary low-pressure system). A precise separation of "antecedent" and "peak-triggering" precipitation is not attempted. Instead, the strict definition of antecedent precipitation periods permits a direct comparison of all catchments. <br><br> The precipitation accumulating 0 to 3 days before an event is the most relevant for floods in Switzerland. PRE-AP precipitation has only a weak and region-specific influence on flood probability. Floods were significantly more frequent after wet PRE-AP periods only in the Jura Mountains, in the western and eastern Swiss plateau, and at the outlet of large lakes. As a general rule, wet PRE-AP periods enhance the flood probability in catchments with gentle topography, high infiltration rates, and large storage capacity (karstic cavities, deep soils, large reservoirs). In contrast, floods were significantly less frequent after wet PRE-AP periods in glacial catchments because of reduced melt. <br><br> For the majority of catchments however, no significant correlation between precipitation amounts and flood occurrences is found when the last 3 days before floods are omitted in the precipitation amounts. Moreover, the PRE-AP was not higher for extreme floods than for annual floods with a high frequency and was very close to climatology for all floods. The fact that floods are not significantly more frequent nor more intense after wet PRE-AP is a clear indicator of a short discharge memory of Pre-Alpine, Alpine and South Alpine Swiss catchments. Our study poses the question whether the impact of long-term precursory precipitation for floods in such catchments is not overestimated in the general perception. The results suggest that the consideration of a 3–4 days precipitation period should be sufficient to represent (understand, reconstruct, model, project) Swiss Alpine floods.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/3903/2015/hess-19-3903-2015.pdf
spellingShingle P. Froidevaux
J. Schwanbeck
R. Weingartner
C. Chevalier
O. Martius
Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
title_full Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
title_fullStr Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
title_full_unstemmed Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
title_short Flood triggering in Switzerland: the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
title_sort flood triggering in switzerland the role of daily to monthly preceding precipitation
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/3903/2015/hess-19-3903-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pfroidevaux floodtriggeringinswitzerlandtheroleofdailytomonthlyprecedingprecipitation
AT jschwanbeck floodtriggeringinswitzerlandtheroleofdailytomonthlyprecedingprecipitation
AT rweingartner floodtriggeringinswitzerlandtheroleofdailytomonthlyprecedingprecipitation
AT cchevalier floodtriggeringinswitzerlandtheroleofdailytomonthlyprecedingprecipitation
AT omartius floodtriggeringinswitzerlandtheroleofdailytomonthlyprecedingprecipitation