Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods

As cardiac cell models become increasingly complex, a correspondingly complex ‘genealogy’ of inherited parameter values has also emerged. The result has been the loss of a direct link between model parameters and experimental data, limiting both reproducibility and the ability to re-fit to new data....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aidan C. Daly, David J. Gavaghan, Chris Holmes, Jonathan Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2015-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.150499
_version_ 1819006333119102976
author Aidan C. Daly
David J. Gavaghan
Chris Holmes
Jonathan Cooper
author_facet Aidan C. Daly
David J. Gavaghan
Chris Holmes
Jonathan Cooper
author_sort Aidan C. Daly
collection DOAJ
description As cardiac cell models become increasingly complex, a correspondingly complex ‘genealogy’ of inherited parameter values has also emerged. The result has been the loss of a direct link between model parameters and experimental data, limiting both reproducibility and the ability to re-fit to new data. We examine the ability of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) to infer parameter distributions in the seminal action potential model of Hodgkin and Huxley, for which an immediate and documented connection to experimental results exists. The ability of ABC to produce tight posteriors around the reported values for the gating rates of sodium and potassium ion channels validates the precision of this early work, while the highly variable posteriors around certain voltage dependency parameters suggests that voltage clamp experiments alone are insufficient to constrain the full model. Despite this, Hodgkin and Huxley's estimates are shown to be competitive with those produced by ABC, and the variable behaviour of posterior parametrized models under complex voltage protocols suggests that with additional data the model could be fully constrained. This work will provide the starting point for a full identifiability analysis of commonly used cardiac models, as well as a template for informative, data-driven parametrization of newly proposed models.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:07:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8b906e7047f43858c2ae84f3e8033bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:07:01Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj.art-d8b906e7047f43858c2ae84f3e8033bb2022-12-21T19:22:27ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032015-01-0121210.1098/rsos.150499150499Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methodsAidan C. DalyDavid J. GavaghanChris HolmesJonathan CooperAs cardiac cell models become increasingly complex, a correspondingly complex ‘genealogy’ of inherited parameter values has also emerged. The result has been the loss of a direct link between model parameters and experimental data, limiting both reproducibility and the ability to re-fit to new data. We examine the ability of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) to infer parameter distributions in the seminal action potential model of Hodgkin and Huxley, for which an immediate and documented connection to experimental results exists. The ability of ABC to produce tight posteriors around the reported values for the gating rates of sodium and potassium ion channels validates the precision of this early work, while the highly variable posteriors around certain voltage dependency parameters suggests that voltage clamp experiments alone are insufficient to constrain the full model. Despite this, Hodgkin and Huxley's estimates are shown to be competitive with those produced by ABC, and the variable behaviour of posterior parametrized models under complex voltage protocols suggests that with additional data the model could be fully constrained. This work will provide the starting point for a full identifiability analysis of commonly used cardiac models, as well as a template for informative, data-driven parametrization of newly proposed models.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.150499hodgkin huxleyapproximate bayesian computationidentifiabilitycardiac cell modellingfunctional curationparameter fitting
spellingShingle Aidan C. Daly
David J. Gavaghan
Chris Holmes
Jonathan Cooper
Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods
Royal Society Open Science
hodgkin huxley
approximate bayesian computation
identifiability
cardiac cell modelling
functional curation
parameter fitting
title Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods
title_full Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods
title_fullStr Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods
title_full_unstemmed Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods
title_short Hodgkin–Huxley revisited: reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate Bayesian methods
title_sort hodgkin huxley revisited reparametrization and identifiability analysis of the classic action potential model with approximate bayesian methods
topic hodgkin huxley
approximate bayesian computation
identifiability
cardiac cell modelling
functional curation
parameter fitting
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.150499
work_keys_str_mv AT aidancdaly hodgkinhuxleyrevisitedreparametrizationandidentifiabilityanalysisoftheclassicactionpotentialmodelwithapproximatebayesianmethods
AT davidjgavaghan hodgkinhuxleyrevisitedreparametrizationandidentifiabilityanalysisoftheclassicactionpotentialmodelwithapproximatebayesianmethods
AT chrisholmes hodgkinhuxleyrevisitedreparametrizationandidentifiabilityanalysisoftheclassicactionpotentialmodelwithapproximatebayesianmethods
AT jonathancooper hodgkinhuxleyrevisitedreparametrizationandidentifiabilityanalysisoftheclassicactionpotentialmodelwithapproximatebayesianmethods