Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in male urogenital function preservation, a meta-analysis
Abstract Background Urogenital dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery can largely affect patients’ postoperative quality of life. Whether robotic surgery can be a better option when comparing with laparoscopic surgery is still not well-known. Methods Comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane...
Main Authors: | Xiaoli Tang, Zheng Wang, Xiaoqing Wu, Meiyuan Yang, Daorong Wang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-10-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1499-y |
Similar Items
-
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
by: Cui Y, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Male urogenital function after robot-assisted and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study
by: Bo Tang, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
A retrospective study of post-operative complications and cost analysis in robotic rectal resection versus laparoscopic rectal resection
by: Muhammad Ali, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Mega Meta-Analysis
by: Shantanu Baral, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
The severity of postoperative complications after robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
by: Yanlei Wang, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)