Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych
The purpose of this article is to show a strong tension between two important values, namely freedom and security. A lawmaker has to choose a limitation of freedom to achieve security, which is very difficult. Legislator has to face with the dilemma in time of an institutional transformation. That t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University
2014-06-01
|
| Series: | Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/12868 |
| _version_ | 1818778954291478528 |
|---|---|
| author | Paweł Mazur |
| author_facet | Paweł Mazur |
| author_sort | Paweł Mazur |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The purpose of this article is to show a strong tension between two important values, namely freedom and security. A lawmaker has to choose a limitation of freedom to achieve security, which is very difficult. Legislator has to face with the dilemma in time of an institutional transformation. That time usually brings a radical growth of criminality. In such circumstances citizens demand from the legislator an effective fight with this serious threat. A lawmaker has to enable citizens both security and freedom by various legal institutions for example initial investigation. The initial investigation is based on a secret interfering in privacy for instance: a wire tapping by such services as police or secret service. This controversial solution has led so far to the reduction of crimes, especially organized. It can be justified by Max Weber’s ethics of responsibility. A lawmaker, however, has to protect the whole political community by some controversial institutions from the moral point of view. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T11:52:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d8ce1427464b48c298b9c94cce00ec9d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2299-1875 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T11:52:55Z |
| publishDate | 2014-06-01 |
| publisher | Adam Mickiewicz University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna |
| spelling | doaj.art-d8ce1427464b48c298b9c94cce00ec9d2022-12-21T21:09:09ZengAdam Mickiewicz UniversityFilozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna2299-18752014-06-013110.14746/fped.2014.3.1.1012868Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczychPaweł Mazur0Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w PoznaniuThe purpose of this article is to show a strong tension between two important values, namely freedom and security. A lawmaker has to choose a limitation of freedom to achieve security, which is very difficult. Legislator has to face with the dilemma in time of an institutional transformation. That time usually brings a radical growth of criminality. In such circumstances citizens demand from the legislator an effective fight with this serious threat. A lawmaker has to enable citizens both security and freedom by various legal institutions for example initial investigation. The initial investigation is based on a secret interfering in privacy for instance: a wire tapping by such services as police or secret service. This controversial solution has led so far to the reduction of crimes, especially organized. It can be justified by Max Weber’s ethics of responsibility. A lawmaker, however, has to protect the whole political community by some controversial institutions from the moral point of view.https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/12868crimelawmakerpolitical communityethics of responsibilitylegal institutionsafety |
| spellingShingle | Paweł Mazur Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna crime lawmaker political community ethics of responsibility legal institution safety |
| title | Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych |
| title_full | Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych |
| title_fullStr | Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych |
| title_short | Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych |
| title_sort | dylemat wolnosc bezpieczenstwo albo o pozytkach z instytucji czynnosci operacyjno rozpoznawczych |
| topic | crime lawmaker political community ethics of responsibility legal institution safety |
| url | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/12868 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pawełmazur dylematwolnoscbezpieczenstwoalboopozytkachzinstytucjiczynnoscioperacyjnorozpoznawczych |