Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI

Background: Early risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has relevant implication for individualized management strategies. The CHA2DS2-VASc and GRACE ACS risk model are well-established r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ran Mo, Yan-min Yang, Han Zhang, Ni Suo, Jing-yang Wang, Si-qi Lyu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IMR Press 2022-05-01
Series:Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/23/5/10.31083/j.rcm2305168
_version_ 1818239895383048192
author Ran Mo
Yan-min Yang
Han Zhang
Ni Suo
Jing-yang Wang
Si-qi Lyu
author_facet Ran Mo
Yan-min Yang
Han Zhang
Ni Suo
Jing-yang Wang
Si-qi Lyu
author_sort Ran Mo
collection DOAJ
description Background: Early risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has relevant implication for individualized management strategies. The CHA2DS2-VASc and GRACE ACS risk model are well-established risk stratification systems. We aimed to assess their prognostic performance in AF patients with ACS or PCI. Methods: Consecutive patients with AF and ACS or referred for PCI were prospectively recruited and followed up for 3 years. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism and ischemia-driven revascularization. Results: Higher CHA2DS2-VASc (HR [hazard ratio] 1.184, 95% CI 1.091–1.284) and GRACE at discharge score (HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.004–1.014) were independently associated with increased risk of MACCEs. The CHA2DS2-VASc (c-statistics: 0.677) and GRACE at discharge (c-statistics: 0.699) demonstrated comparable discriminative capacity for MACCEs (p = 0.281) while GRACE at admission provided relatively lower discrimination (c-statistics: 0.629, p vs. CHA2DS2-VASc = 0.041). For predicting all-cause mortality, three models displayed good discriminative capacity (c-statistics: 0.750 for CHA2DS2-VASc, 0.775 for GRACE at admission, 0.846 for GRACE at discharge). A significant discrimination improvement of GRACE at discharge compared to CHA2DS2-VASc was detected (NRI = 45.13%). Conclusions: In the setting of coexistence of AF and ACS or PCI, CHA2DS2-VASc and GRACE at discharge score were independently associated with an increased risk of MACCEs. The GRACE at discharge performed better in predicting all-cause mortality.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T13:04:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8d6ffc17fa34070b7f13f1f8509e46d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1530-6550
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T13:04:49Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher IMR Press
record_format Article
series Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d8d6ffc17fa34070b7f13f1f8509e46d2022-12-22T00:23:42ZengIMR PressReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine1530-65502022-05-0123516810.31083/j.rcm2305168S1530-6550(22)00505-1Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCIRan Mo0Yan-min Yang1Han Zhang2Ni Suo3Jing-yang Wang4Si-qi Lyu5Emergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, ChinaEmergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, ChinaEmergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, ChinaEmergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, ChinaEmergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, ChinaEmergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, ChinaBackground: Early risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has relevant implication for individualized management strategies. The CHA2DS2-VASc and GRACE ACS risk model are well-established risk stratification systems. We aimed to assess their prognostic performance in AF patients with ACS or PCI. Methods: Consecutive patients with AF and ACS or referred for PCI were prospectively recruited and followed up for 3 years. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism and ischemia-driven revascularization. Results: Higher CHA2DS2-VASc (HR [hazard ratio] 1.184, 95% CI 1.091–1.284) and GRACE at discharge score (HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.004–1.014) were independently associated with increased risk of MACCEs. The CHA2DS2-VASc (c-statistics: 0.677) and GRACE at discharge (c-statistics: 0.699) demonstrated comparable discriminative capacity for MACCEs (p = 0.281) while GRACE at admission provided relatively lower discrimination (c-statistics: 0.629, p vs. CHA2DS2-VASc = 0.041). For predicting all-cause mortality, three models displayed good discriminative capacity (c-statistics: 0.750 for CHA2DS2-VASc, 0.775 for GRACE at admission, 0.846 for GRACE at discharge). A significant discrimination improvement of GRACE at discharge compared to CHA2DS2-VASc was detected (NRI = 45.13%). Conclusions: In the setting of coexistence of AF and ACS or PCI, CHA2DS2-VASc and GRACE at discharge score were independently associated with an increased risk of MACCEs. The GRACE at discharge performed better in predicting all-cause mortality.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/23/5/10.31083/j.rcm2305168atrial fibrillationacute coronary syndromepercutaneous coronary interventiongracecha2ds2-vasc score
spellingShingle Ran Mo
Yan-min Yang
Han Zhang
Ni Suo
Jing-yang Wang
Si-qi Lyu
Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
atrial fibrillation
acute coronary syndrome
percutaneous coronary intervention
grace
cha2ds2-vasc score
title Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI
title_full Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI
title_fullStr Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI
title_short Clinical Application of CHA2DS2-VASc versus GRACE Scores for Assessing the Risk of Long-term Ischemic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI
title_sort clinical application of cha2ds2 vasc versus grace scores for assessing the risk of long term ischemic events in atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or pci
topic atrial fibrillation
acute coronary syndrome
percutaneous coronary intervention
grace
cha2ds2-vasc score
url https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/23/5/10.31083/j.rcm2305168
work_keys_str_mv AT ranmo clinicalapplicationofcha2ds2vascversusgracescoresforassessingtheriskoflongtermischemiceventsinatrialfibrillationandacutecoronarysyndromeorpci
AT yanminyang clinicalapplicationofcha2ds2vascversusgracescoresforassessingtheriskoflongtermischemiceventsinatrialfibrillationandacutecoronarysyndromeorpci
AT hanzhang clinicalapplicationofcha2ds2vascversusgracescoresforassessingtheriskoflongtermischemiceventsinatrialfibrillationandacutecoronarysyndromeorpci
AT nisuo clinicalapplicationofcha2ds2vascversusgracescoresforassessingtheriskoflongtermischemiceventsinatrialfibrillationandacutecoronarysyndromeorpci
AT jingyangwang clinicalapplicationofcha2ds2vascversusgracescoresforassessingtheriskoflongtermischemiceventsinatrialfibrillationandacutecoronarysyndromeorpci
AT siqilyu clinicalapplicationofcha2ds2vascversusgracescoresforassessingtheriskoflongtermischemiceventsinatrialfibrillationandacutecoronarysyndromeorpci