Leading Gillick Astray? An Analysis of the Law of Consent Relevant to Trans and Gender Diverse Minors and the Commencement of Gender-Affirming Hormone Treatment
This article outlines and critiques the Australian jurisprudence that has addressed whether minors are able to lawfully consent to gender-affirming hormone treatment, with reference to the landmark decision of <i>Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority</i>. Although the...
Main Author: | Malcolm K. Smith |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Laws |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/2/26 |
Similar Items
-
Reforming the Law on Consent to Medical Treatment for Trans Youth: A Renewed Call for Legislative Intervention
by: Steph Jowett, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
The Real-World Characteristics of Gender-Affirming Hormonal Use Among Transgender People in Thailand
by: Sakditat Ittiphisit, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Life experiences leading to the choice of surgery—A qualitative study exploring reasons behind the choice of undergoing gender affirmative surgery
by: Lene Kjelkenes Bjørnson, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Gender Affirmation in India—The Current State of Knowledge, Management, Legal and Legislative Situation
by: Richie Gupta
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Sexual & reproductive health information on minor consent forms for pubertal suppression and gender affirming hormones
by: Julia Taylor, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)