Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber

The use of adhesives and metal connectors is vital in engineered wood product (EWP) composition. However, the utilization of adhesives poses sustainability and recyclability challenges due to the emission of toxic gases. Similarly, metal fasteners negatively impact the disposal, reusability, and rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hüseyin Emre Ilgın, Markku Karjalainen, Mika Alanen, Mikko Malaska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Fire
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/9/352
_version_ 1797580110754217984
author Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
Markku Karjalainen
Mika Alanen
Mikko Malaska
author_facet Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
Markku Karjalainen
Mika Alanen
Mikko Malaska
author_sort Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
collection DOAJ
description The use of adhesives and metal connectors is vital in engineered wood product (EWP) composition. However, the utilization of adhesives poses sustainability and recyclability challenges due to the emission of toxic gases. Similarly, metal fasteners negatively impact the disposal, reusability, and recyclability of EWPs. An alternative solution that exclusively employs pure wood, known as dovetail massive wooden board elements (DMWBEs), eliminates the need for adhesives and metal fasteners. This paper presents an experimental comparative assessment of the fire/charring performance of DMWBEs and cross-laminated timber (CLT). Model-scale test specimens measuring 200 mm in thickness, 950 mm in width, and 950 mm in length were vertically tested according to EN 1363-1. The charring behavior of DMWBEs closely resembled that of solid timber, with only a slight increase in the charring rate. Charring primarily occurred in the third lamella layer out of five, with no observable flames or hot gases on the unexposed side. The dovetail detail effectively prevented char fall-off with the tested lamella thickness. CLT specimens exhibited a notable rise in the charring rate due to the fall-off of the first lamellae layer.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:46:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8dc9e30843f47338d9da8f9b2a618ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-6255
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:46:42Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fire
spelling doaj.art-d8dc9e30843f47338d9da8f9b2a618ac2023-11-19T10:40:17ZengMDPI AGFire2571-62552023-09-016935210.3390/fire6090352Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated TimberHüseyin Emre Ilgın0Markku Karjalainen1Mika Alanen2Mikko Malaska3Faculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33014 Tampere, FinlandFaculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33014 Tampere, FinlandFaculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33014 Tampere, FinlandFaculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33014 Tampere, FinlandThe use of adhesives and metal connectors is vital in engineered wood product (EWP) composition. However, the utilization of adhesives poses sustainability and recyclability challenges due to the emission of toxic gases. Similarly, metal fasteners negatively impact the disposal, reusability, and recyclability of EWPs. An alternative solution that exclusively employs pure wood, known as dovetail massive wooden board elements (DMWBEs), eliminates the need for adhesives and metal fasteners. This paper presents an experimental comparative assessment of the fire/charring performance of DMWBEs and cross-laminated timber (CLT). Model-scale test specimens measuring 200 mm in thickness, 950 mm in width, and 950 mm in length were vertically tested according to EN 1363-1. The charring behavior of DMWBEs closely resembled that of solid timber, with only a slight increase in the charring rate. Charring primarily occurred in the third lamella layer out of five, with no observable flames or hot gases on the unexposed side. The dovetail detail effectively prevented char fall-off with the tested lamella thickness. CLT specimens exhibited a notable rise in the charring rate due to the fall-off of the first lamellae layer.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/9/352dovetail massive wooden board elementsCLTfire performancechar depthcharring rate
spellingShingle Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
Markku Karjalainen
Mika Alanen
Mikko Malaska
Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber
Fire
dovetail massive wooden board elements
CLT
fire performance
char depth
charring rate
title Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber
title_full Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber
title_fullStr Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber
title_short Evaluating Fire Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Dovetail Massive Wooden Board Elements and Cross-Laminated Timber
title_sort evaluating fire performance an experimental comparison of dovetail massive wooden board elements and cross laminated timber
topic dovetail massive wooden board elements
CLT
fire performance
char depth
charring rate
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/9/352
work_keys_str_mv AT huseyinemreilgın evaluatingfireperformanceanexperimentalcomparisonofdovetailmassivewoodenboardelementsandcrosslaminatedtimber
AT markkukarjalainen evaluatingfireperformanceanexperimentalcomparisonofdovetailmassivewoodenboardelementsandcrosslaminatedtimber
AT mikaalanen evaluatingfireperformanceanexperimentalcomparisonofdovetailmassivewoodenboardelementsandcrosslaminatedtimber
AT mikkomalaska evaluatingfireperformanceanexperimentalcomparisonofdovetailmassivewoodenboardelementsandcrosslaminatedtimber