Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics

Fouling behaviour in membrane distillation (MD) processes plays a crucial role in determining their widespread acceptability. Most studies have primarily focused on model organic foulants, such as humic acid (HA) and sodium alginate (SA). This study investigates the fouling of a polytetrafluoroethyl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasikh Habib, Mai Phuong Do, Muhammad Bilal Asif, Guangming Jiang, Muttucumaru Sivakumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2024-03-01
Series:Water Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/89/5/1325
_version_ 1797200759890116608
author Rasikh Habib
Mai Phuong Do
Muhammad Bilal Asif
Guangming Jiang
Muttucumaru Sivakumar
author_facet Rasikh Habib
Mai Phuong Do
Muhammad Bilal Asif
Guangming Jiang
Muttucumaru Sivakumar
author_sort Rasikh Habib
collection DOAJ
description Fouling behaviour in membrane distillation (MD) processes plays a crucial role in determining their widespread acceptability. Most studies have primarily focused on model organic foulants, such as humic acid (HA) and sodium alginate (SA). This study investigates the fouling of a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane in a direct contact MD (DCMD) using model organics (i.e., HA and SA) and real wastewater. The results indicated that the flux decline (5–60%) was only observed during the initial phase of the operation with model organic foulants. In contrast, real wastewater caused a gradual decline in flux throughout the experiment in both the concentrate (40%) and continuous (90%) modes. The study also found significant differences in the fouling layer morphology, composition, and hydrophobicity between the model organic foulants and real wastewater. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy findings demonstrated that the fouling layer formed by real wastewater varied significantly from model organics, which primarily comprised of protein-like and polysaccharide-like functional groups. Finally, liquid chromatography–organic carbon detection revealed that the fouling layer of the MD membrane with real wastewater was composed of 40.7% hydrophobic and 59.3% hydrophilic organics. This study suggests that model organics may not accurately reflect real wastewater fouling. HIGHLIGHTS Model organics and real wastewater exhibit different fouling behaviours in membrane distillation (MD).; Fouling layer by model organics was unevenly distributed and affected MD membrane properties.; Long-term (22 days) experiment showed continuous flux decline caused by organic–inorganic foulant interaction.; Real wastewater treatment instigated a membrane fouling layer consisting of proteins and polysaccharides.;
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:36:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8e999eb1dba4c2cbd68055daeb845ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:36:46Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher IWA Publishing
record_format Article
series Water Science and Technology
spelling doaj.art-d8e999eb1dba4c2cbd68055daeb845ed2024-04-20T05:50:35ZengIWA PublishingWater Science and Technology0273-12231996-97322024-03-018951325133910.2166/wst.2024.045045Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organicsRasikh Habib0Mai Phuong Do1Muhammad Bilal Asif2Guangming Jiang3Muttucumaru Sivakumar4 School of Civil, Mining, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2525, Australia School of Civil, Mining, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2525, Australia Advanced Membranes & Porous Materials Centre and KAUST Catalysis Centre, Physical Science & Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia School of Civil, Mining, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2525, Australia School of Civil, Mining, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2525, Australia Fouling behaviour in membrane distillation (MD) processes plays a crucial role in determining their widespread acceptability. Most studies have primarily focused on model organic foulants, such as humic acid (HA) and sodium alginate (SA). This study investigates the fouling of a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane in a direct contact MD (DCMD) using model organics (i.e., HA and SA) and real wastewater. The results indicated that the flux decline (5–60%) was only observed during the initial phase of the operation with model organic foulants. In contrast, real wastewater caused a gradual decline in flux throughout the experiment in both the concentrate (40%) and continuous (90%) modes. The study also found significant differences in the fouling layer morphology, composition, and hydrophobicity between the model organic foulants and real wastewater. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy findings demonstrated that the fouling layer formed by real wastewater varied significantly from model organics, which primarily comprised of protein-like and polysaccharide-like functional groups. Finally, liquid chromatography–organic carbon detection revealed that the fouling layer of the MD membrane with real wastewater was composed of 40.7% hydrophobic and 59.3% hydrophilic organics. This study suggests that model organics may not accurately reflect real wastewater fouling. HIGHLIGHTS Model organics and real wastewater exhibit different fouling behaviours in membrane distillation (MD).; Fouling layer by model organics was unevenly distributed and affected MD membrane properties.; Long-term (22 days) experiment showed continuous flux decline caused by organic–inorganic foulant interaction.; Real wastewater treatment instigated a membrane fouling layer consisting of proteins and polysaccharides.;http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/89/5/1325direct contact membrane distillation (dcmd)effluent organic matterhumic acidorganic fouling mechanismssodium alginate
spellingShingle Rasikh Habib
Mai Phuong Do
Muhammad Bilal Asif
Guangming Jiang
Muttucumaru Sivakumar
Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics
Water Science and Technology
direct contact membrane distillation (dcmd)
effluent organic matter
humic acid
organic fouling mechanisms
sodium alginate
title Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics
title_full Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics
title_fullStr Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics
title_full_unstemmed Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics
title_short Membrane distillation of wastewater: comparison of model and real organics
title_sort membrane distillation of wastewater comparison of model and real organics
topic direct contact membrane distillation (dcmd)
effluent organic matter
humic acid
organic fouling mechanisms
sodium alginate
url http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/89/5/1325
work_keys_str_mv AT rasikhhabib membranedistillationofwastewatercomparisonofmodelandrealorganics
AT maiphuongdo membranedistillationofwastewatercomparisonofmodelandrealorganics
AT muhammadbilalasif membranedistillationofwastewatercomparisonofmodelandrealorganics
AT guangmingjiang membranedistillationofwastewatercomparisonofmodelandrealorganics
AT muttucumarusivakumar membranedistillationofwastewatercomparisonofmodelandrealorganics