Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors

Multirotors are gaining great importance in the layout of innovative and more agile mobility. In this framework, a possible solution to developing an aircraft complying with the stringent size requirements characterizing this type of application may be a coaxial rotor configuration. To exploit sever...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicola Russo, Aniello Daniele Marano, Giuseppe Maurizio Gagliardi, Michele Guida, Tiziano Polito, Francesco Marulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/10/6/535
_version_ 1827739095841898496
author Nicola Russo
Aniello Daniele Marano
Giuseppe Maurizio Gagliardi
Michele Guida
Tiziano Polito
Francesco Marulo
author_facet Nicola Russo
Aniello Daniele Marano
Giuseppe Maurizio Gagliardi
Michele Guida
Tiziano Polito
Francesco Marulo
author_sort Nicola Russo
collection DOAJ
description Multirotors are gaining great importance in the layout of innovative and more agile mobility. In this framework, a possible solution to developing an aircraft complying with the stringent size requirements characterizing this type of application may be a coaxial rotor configuration. To exploit several possibilities linked to coaxial rotors, a scaled experimental model is designed to evaluate the performances of the counter-rotating propeller system, specifically regarding the distance between the two propellers. Both thrust and noise are considered as parameters of interest. Two brushless motors are deployed, whereas the propellers’ angular velocity, in terms of rounds per minute (rpm), is controlled by an external control system. Tests are conducted on both single isolated propellers as well as on the counter-rotating system: the two propellers and their respective motors are characterized regarding the thrust. Furthermore, a comparison with a numerical model is performed. Noise evaluation on the single propeller shows a motor contribution prevalence at a low rpm range (1140–1500 rpm) and a propeller prevalence for angular velocities higher than 1860 rpm. By varying the distances between the propellers, a sensitivity analysis is performed with the aim of identifying the optimum configuration, taking into account both noise and thrust performances.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:54:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d8fca39196304c25829180660ca42eb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-4310
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:54:14Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj.art-d8fca39196304c25829180660ca42eb22023-11-18T08:49:58ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102023-06-0110653510.3390/aerospace10060535Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial RotorsNicola Russo0Aniello Daniele Marano1Giuseppe Maurizio Gagliardi2Michele Guida3Tiziano Polito4Francesco Marulo5Industrial Engineering Department, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, ItalyMultirotors are gaining great importance in the layout of innovative and more agile mobility. In this framework, a possible solution to developing an aircraft complying with the stringent size requirements characterizing this type of application may be a coaxial rotor configuration. To exploit several possibilities linked to coaxial rotors, a scaled experimental model is designed to evaluate the performances of the counter-rotating propeller system, specifically regarding the distance between the two propellers. Both thrust and noise are considered as parameters of interest. Two brushless motors are deployed, whereas the propellers’ angular velocity, in terms of rounds per minute (rpm), is controlled by an external control system. Tests are conducted on both single isolated propellers as well as on the counter-rotating system: the two propellers and their respective motors are characterized regarding the thrust. Furthermore, a comparison with a numerical model is performed. Noise evaluation on the single propeller shows a motor contribution prevalence at a low rpm range (1140–1500 rpm) and a propeller prevalence for angular velocities higher than 1860 rpm. By varying the distances between the propellers, a sensitivity analysis is performed with the aim of identifying the optimum configuration, taking into account both noise and thrust performances.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/10/6/535multirotorscoaxial rotorscounter-rotating propellersthrust performancesnoise
spellingShingle Nicola Russo
Aniello Daniele Marano
Giuseppe Maurizio Gagliardi
Michele Guida
Tiziano Polito
Francesco Marulo
Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors
Aerospace
multirotors
coaxial rotors
counter-rotating propellers
thrust performances
noise
title Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors
title_full Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors
title_fullStr Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors
title_full_unstemmed Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors
title_short Thrust and Noise Experimental Assessment on Counter-Rotating Coaxial Rotors
title_sort thrust and noise experimental assessment on counter rotating coaxial rotors
topic multirotors
coaxial rotors
counter-rotating propellers
thrust performances
noise
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/10/6/535
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolarusso thrustandnoiseexperimentalassessmentoncounterrotatingcoaxialrotors
AT aniellodanielemarano thrustandnoiseexperimentalassessmentoncounterrotatingcoaxialrotors
AT giuseppemauriziogagliardi thrustandnoiseexperimentalassessmentoncounterrotatingcoaxialrotors
AT micheleguida thrustandnoiseexperimentalassessmentoncounterrotatingcoaxialrotors
AT tizianopolito thrustandnoiseexperimentalassessmentoncounterrotatingcoaxialrotors
AT francescomarulo thrustandnoiseexperimentalassessmentoncounterrotatingcoaxialrotors