Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices

Optimal decision making in complex environments requires dynamic learning from unexpected events. To speed up learning, we should heavily weight information that indicates state-action-outcome contingency changes and ignore uninformative fluctuations in the environment. Often, however, unrelated inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hans Kirschner, Adrian G. Fischer, Markus Ullsperger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-10-01
Series:NeuroImage
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922005547
_version_ 1811293913187614720
author Hans Kirschner
Adrian G. Fischer
Markus Ullsperger
author_facet Hans Kirschner
Adrian G. Fischer
Markus Ullsperger
author_sort Hans Kirschner
collection DOAJ
description Optimal decision making in complex environments requires dynamic learning from unexpected events. To speed up learning, we should heavily weight information that indicates state-action-outcome contingency changes and ignore uninformative fluctuations in the environment. Often, however, unrelated information is hard to ignore and can potentially bias our learning. Here we used computational modelling and EEG to investigate learning behaviour in a modified probabilistic choice task that introduced two task-irrelevant factors that were uninformative for optimal task performance, but nevertheless could potentially bias learning: pay-out magnitudes were varied randomly and, occasionally, feedback presentation was enhanced by visual surprise. We found that participants’ overall good learning performance was biased by distinct effects of these non-normative factors. On the neural level, these parameters are represented in a dynamic and spatiotemporally dissociable sequence of EEG activity. Later in feedback processing the different streams converged on a central to centroparietal positivity reflecting a signal that is interpreted by downstream learning processes that adjust future behaviour.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:09:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d905760957634902a418968370d657f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1095-9572
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:09:32Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage
spelling doaj.art-d905760957634902a418968370d657f42022-12-22T03:01:05ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722022-10-01259119437Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choicesHans Kirschner0Adrian G. Fischer1Markus Ullsperger2Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany; Corresponding author.Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, D-39106 Magdeburg, GermanyOptimal decision making in complex environments requires dynamic learning from unexpected events. To speed up learning, we should heavily weight information that indicates state-action-outcome contingency changes and ignore uninformative fluctuations in the environment. Often, however, unrelated information is hard to ignore and can potentially bias our learning. Here we used computational modelling and EEG to investigate learning behaviour in a modified probabilistic choice task that introduced two task-irrelevant factors that were uninformative for optimal task performance, but nevertheless could potentially bias learning: pay-out magnitudes were varied randomly and, occasionally, feedback presentation was enhanced by visual surprise. We found that participants’ overall good learning performance was biased by distinct effects of these non-normative factors. On the neural level, these parameters are represented in a dynamic and spatiotemporally dissociable sequence of EEG activity. Later in feedback processing the different streams converged on a central to centroparietal positivity reflecting a signal that is interpreted by downstream learning processes that adjust future behaviour.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922005547
spellingShingle Hans Kirschner
Adrian G. Fischer
Markus Ullsperger
Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices
NeuroImage
title Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices
title_full Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices
title_fullStr Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices
title_full_unstemmed Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices
title_short Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices
title_sort feedback related eeg dynamics separately reflect decision parameters biases and future choices
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922005547
work_keys_str_mv AT hanskirschner feedbackrelatedeegdynamicsseparatelyreflectdecisionparametersbiasesandfuturechoices
AT adriangfischer feedbackrelatedeegdynamicsseparatelyreflectdecisionparametersbiasesandfuturechoices
AT markusullsperger feedbackrelatedeegdynamicsseparatelyreflectdecisionparametersbiasesandfuturechoices