Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty]
The subject of this paper is one of the central problems of philosophy, which isaptly stated by Hilary Putnam: “How does mind/language hook on to the world?”.This question presupposes a model of knowledge which may be called “the subject--object model of knowledge”. However, contemporary philosopher...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Analiza i Egzystencja |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1366928803.pdf |
_version_ | 1819177997341556736 |
---|---|
author | Daniel Żuromski |
author_facet | Daniel Żuromski |
author_sort | Daniel Żuromski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The subject of this paper is one of the central problems of philosophy, which isaptly stated by Hilary Putnam: “How does mind/language hook on to the world?”.This question presupposes a model of knowledge which may be called “the subject--object model of knowledge”. However, contemporary philosophers such as WilfridSellars, Hilary Putnam, Donald Davidson, Richard Rorty, John McDowell, JohnHaugeland and Robert Brandom criticize this traditional model of knowledge. I claimthat at least some versions of neopragmatism look at this problem implicitly assum-ing a transcendental point of view. This istranscendentalism without transcendentalstandpointand can be found in Marek Siemek’s works. This transcendentalismcan be considered in two ways. First, as a therapy – a standpoint that is characteristicof Rorty, who demonstrated that the subject-object model of knowledge is optionaland contingent. Second, as constructivism – this standpoint is represented by Bran-dom, who tries to show that this traditional model is not autonomus. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:35:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d9158a73bcf740fda3d93ef7a37a9195 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1734-9923 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:35:33Z |
publishDate | 2012-12-01 |
publisher | Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego |
record_format | Article |
series | Analiza i Egzystencja |
spelling | doaj.art-d9158a73bcf740fda3d93ef7a37a91952022-12-21T18:11:47ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja1734-99232012-12-01203763Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty]Daniel ŻuromskiThe subject of this paper is one of the central problems of philosophy, which isaptly stated by Hilary Putnam: “How does mind/language hook on to the world?”.This question presupposes a model of knowledge which may be called “the subject--object model of knowledge”. However, contemporary philosophers such as WilfridSellars, Hilary Putnam, Donald Davidson, Richard Rorty, John McDowell, JohnHaugeland and Robert Brandom criticize this traditional model of knowledge. I claimthat at least some versions of neopragmatism look at this problem implicitly assum-ing a transcendental point of view. This istranscendentalism without transcendentalstandpointand can be found in Marek Siemek’s works. This transcendentalismcan be considered in two ways. First, as a therapy – a standpoint that is characteristicof Rorty, who demonstrated that the subject-object model of knowledge is optionaland contingent. Second, as constructivism – this standpoint is represented by Bran-dom, who tries to show that this traditional model is not autonomus.http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1366928803.pdfneopragmatismtranscendentalism without transcendental st andpointintentionalitysubject-object model of knowledgephilosophy as a the rapyphilosophy as a construction |
spellingShingle | Daniel Żuromski Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty] Analiza i Egzystencja neopragmatism transcendentalism without transcendental st andpoint intentionality subject-object model of knowledge philosophy as a the rapy philosophy as a construction |
title | Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty] |
title_full | Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty] |
title_fullStr | Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty] |
title_full_unstemmed | Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty] |
title_short | Czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem? Rozważania na tle filozofii Richarda Rorty’ego i Roberta Brandoma [Is Neopragmatism Transcendentalism? Considerations in the Background of the Philosophy of Robert Brandom and Richard Rorty] |
title_sort | czy neopragmatyzm jest transcendentalizmem rozwazania na tle filozofii richarda rorty ego i roberta brandoma is neopragmatism transcendentalism considerations in the background of the philosophy of robert brandom and richard rorty |
topic | neopragmatism transcendentalism without transcendental st andpoint intentionality subject-object model of knowledge philosophy as a the rapy philosophy as a construction |
url | http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1366928803.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielzuromski czyneopragmatyzmjesttranscendentalizmemrozwazanianatlefilozofiirichardarortyegoirobertabrandomaisneopragmatismtranscendentalismconsiderationsinthebackgroundofthephilosophyofrobertbrandomandrichardrorty |