A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
Curriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determin...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573/full |
_version_ | 1797674019719217152 |
---|---|
author | DesRee Sabata Matiki Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo Joseph Jinja Divala |
author_facet | DesRee Sabata Matiki Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo Joseph Jinja Divala |
author_sort | DesRee Sabata Matiki |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Curriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determine how teachers are involved in the curriculum development processes in Namibia. It did this by examining related literature from selected developing and developed countries on teacher involvement in the curriculum development processes. It further deployed a qualitative research approach which had a sample size of 11 secondary school teachers and six NIED officials who were interviewed. The empirical data alongside the reviewed literature, and the theoretical framework were thematically analysed. The findings revealed that secondary school teachers in Namibia did not meaningfully participate during the key stages of the curriculum development processes. These findings further affirmed the assumptions that teacher’s voices are mostly discounted during curriculum development processes despite the centrality of their roles and functions. The study further established that Namibia, like many African countries, use the top-down approaches when developing their curricula unlike developed countries such as Australia, Finland and Singapore. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:54:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d917c7dd228b42f38f91a666964a4030 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2504-284X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:54:10Z |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Education |
spelling | doaj.art-d917c7dd228b42f38f91a666964a40302023-09-26T05:58:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2023-09-01810.3389/feduc.2023.12435731243573A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of NamibiaDesRee Sabata MatikiMackenzie Ishmael ChibamboJoseph Jinja DivalaCurriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determine how teachers are involved in the curriculum development processes in Namibia. It did this by examining related literature from selected developing and developed countries on teacher involvement in the curriculum development processes. It further deployed a qualitative research approach which had a sample size of 11 secondary school teachers and six NIED officials who were interviewed. The empirical data alongside the reviewed literature, and the theoretical framework were thematically analysed. The findings revealed that secondary school teachers in Namibia did not meaningfully participate during the key stages of the curriculum development processes. These findings further affirmed the assumptions that teacher’s voices are mostly discounted during curriculum development processes despite the centrality of their roles and functions. The study further established that Namibia, like many African countries, use the top-down approaches when developing their curricula unlike developed countries such as Australia, Finland and Singapore.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573/fullequitycurriculum transformationsintentionstop-bottom approachesbottom-up approaches |
spellingShingle | DesRee Sabata Matiki Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo Joseph Jinja Divala A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia Frontiers in Education equity curriculum transformations intentions top-bottom approaches bottom-up approaches |
title | A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia |
title_full | A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia |
title_fullStr | A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia |
title_short | A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia |
title_sort | comparison of teacher s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries a case study of namibia |
topic | equity curriculum transformations intentions top-bottom approaches bottom-up approaches |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desreesabatamatiki acomparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia AT mackenzieishmaelchibambo acomparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia AT josephjinjadivala acomparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia AT desreesabatamatiki comparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia AT mackenzieishmaelchibambo comparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia AT josephjinjadivala comparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia |