A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia

Curriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DesRee Sabata Matiki, Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo, Joseph Jinja Divala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573/full
_version_ 1797674019719217152
author DesRee Sabata Matiki
Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo
Joseph Jinja Divala
author_facet DesRee Sabata Matiki
Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo
Joseph Jinja Divala
author_sort DesRee Sabata Matiki
collection DOAJ
description Curriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determine how teachers are involved in the curriculum development processes in Namibia. It did this by examining related literature from selected developing and developed countries on teacher involvement in the curriculum development processes. It further deployed a qualitative research approach which had a sample size of 11 secondary school teachers and six NIED officials who were interviewed. The empirical data alongside the reviewed literature, and the theoretical framework were thematically analysed. The findings revealed that secondary school teachers in Namibia did not meaningfully participate during the key stages of the curriculum development processes. These findings further affirmed the assumptions that teacher’s voices are mostly discounted during curriculum development processes despite the centrality of their roles and functions. The study further established that Namibia, like many African countries, use the top-down approaches when developing their curricula unlike developed countries such as Australia, Finland and Singapore.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:54:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d917c7dd228b42f38f91a666964a4030
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-284X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:54:10Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj.art-d917c7dd228b42f38f91a666964a40302023-09-26T05:58:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2023-09-01810.3389/feduc.2023.12435731243573A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of NamibiaDesRee Sabata MatikiMackenzie Ishmael ChibamboJoseph Jinja DivalaCurriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determine how teachers are involved in the curriculum development processes in Namibia. It did this by examining related literature from selected developing and developed countries on teacher involvement in the curriculum development processes. It further deployed a qualitative research approach which had a sample size of 11 secondary school teachers and six NIED officials who were interviewed. The empirical data alongside the reviewed literature, and the theoretical framework were thematically analysed. The findings revealed that secondary school teachers in Namibia did not meaningfully participate during the key stages of the curriculum development processes. These findings further affirmed the assumptions that teacher’s voices are mostly discounted during curriculum development processes despite the centrality of their roles and functions. The study further established that Namibia, like many African countries, use the top-down approaches when developing their curricula unlike developed countries such as Australia, Finland and Singapore.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573/fullequitycurriculum transformationsintentionstop-bottom approachesbottom-up approaches
spellingShingle DesRee Sabata Matiki
Mackenzie Ishmael Chibambo
Joseph Jinja Divala
A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
Frontiers in Education
equity
curriculum transformations
intentions
top-bottom approaches
bottom-up approaches
title A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
title_full A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
title_fullStr A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
title_short A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries: a case study of Namibia
title_sort comparison of teacher s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries a case study of namibia
topic equity
curriculum transformations
intentions
top-bottom approaches
bottom-up approaches
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573/full
work_keys_str_mv AT desreesabatamatiki acomparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia
AT mackenzieishmaelchibambo acomparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia
AT josephjinjadivala acomparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia
AT desreesabatamatiki comparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia
AT mackenzieishmaelchibambo comparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia
AT josephjinjadivala comparisonofteachersinvolvementincurriculumdevelopmentindevelopinganddevelopedcountriesacasestudyofnamibia