Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula

A spatially explicit management strategy is presented for Kirtland’s Warbler (<i>Setophaga kirtlandii</i>) habitat on the Hiawatha National Forest in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The Hiawatha National Forest has a goal of continuously providing large patches of dense young jack pine for K...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric Henderson, Howard Hoganson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/8/1065
_version_ 1797523866689470464
author Eric Henderson
Howard Hoganson
author_facet Eric Henderson
Howard Hoganson
author_sort Eric Henderson
collection DOAJ
description A spatially explicit management strategy is presented for Kirtland’s Warbler (<i>Setophaga kirtlandii</i>) habitat on the Hiawatha National Forest in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The Hiawatha National Forest has a goal of continuously providing large patches of dense young jack pine for Kirtland’s warbler breeding habitat. The problem is challenging as patches of suitable habitat are relatively short lived, forcing large shifts in the location of large patches in the future. In this study, alternative management strategies for providing habitat are described, explicitly mapped, and compared on a 70,600 ha landscape in the context of implementing many desired conditions of the forest’s land management plan. Strategies are developed by using two interacting scheduling models. Comparisons address overall habitat levels, habitat spatial arrangement through time, and financial trade-offs. The financial cost of managing habitat is high and there are further financial trade-offs associated with aggregating habitat into large patches. Furthermore, the marginal cost of habitat increases as more habitat is added to the management system. Managers may use information about the added costs of spatially explicit habitat management to help evaluate the added benefits to the species. It is often expensive to establish wildlife habitat and desirable ecological conditions, but results show that there are potential benefits from using detailed computer-aided management scheduling tools to support the decision-making process.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:48:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9199d407d8546d8b89106cc25d82bfc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:48:12Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-d9199d407d8546d8b89106cc25d82bfc2023-11-22T07:43:01ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-08-01128106510.3390/f12081065Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper PeninsulaEric Henderson0Howard Hoganson1USDA Forest Service Northern Region, 26 Fort Missoula Road, Missoula, MT 59804, USADepartment of Forest Resources and NC Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USAA spatially explicit management strategy is presented for Kirtland’s Warbler (<i>Setophaga kirtlandii</i>) habitat on the Hiawatha National Forest in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The Hiawatha National Forest has a goal of continuously providing large patches of dense young jack pine for Kirtland’s warbler breeding habitat. The problem is challenging as patches of suitable habitat are relatively short lived, forcing large shifts in the location of large patches in the future. In this study, alternative management strategies for providing habitat are described, explicitly mapped, and compared on a 70,600 ha landscape in the context of implementing many desired conditions of the forest’s land management plan. Strategies are developed by using two interacting scheduling models. Comparisons address overall habitat levels, habitat spatial arrangement through time, and financial trade-offs. The financial cost of managing habitat is high and there are further financial trade-offs associated with aggregating habitat into large patches. Furthermore, the marginal cost of habitat increases as more habitat is added to the management system. Managers may use information about the added costs of spatially explicit habitat management to help evaluate the added benefits to the species. It is often expensive to establish wildlife habitat and desirable ecological conditions, but results show that there are potential benefits from using detailed computer-aided management scheduling tools to support the decision-making process.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/8/1065Kirtland’s warblerhabitat planningspatial planningfinancial trade-offsmultiple objectivesforest planning
spellingShingle Eric Henderson
Howard Hoganson
Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
Forests
Kirtland’s warbler
habitat planning
spatial planning
financial trade-offs
multiple objectives
forest planning
title Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
title_full Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
title_fullStr Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
title_full_unstemmed Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
title_short Spatially Explicit Kirtland’s Warbler Habitat Management Scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
title_sort spatially explicit kirtland s warbler habitat management scheduling in michigan s upper peninsula
topic Kirtland’s warbler
habitat planning
spatial planning
financial trade-offs
multiple objectives
forest planning
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/8/1065
work_keys_str_mv AT erichenderson spatiallyexplicitkirtlandswarblerhabitatmanagementschedulinginmichigansupperpeninsula
AT howardhoganson spatiallyexplicitkirtlandswarblerhabitatmanagementschedulinginmichigansupperpeninsula