Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis

Abstract The aim of this study is to compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) smaller than 3 cm. A Markov cohort model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients aged 60–65 years with small HCCs who had undergone either...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Young‐Seok Seo, Mi‐Sook Kim, Hyung‐Jun Yoo, Won Il Jang, Eun Kyung Paik, Chul Ju Han, Byung‐Hee Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-11-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.893
_version_ 1811212444866969600
author Young‐Seok Seo
Mi‐Sook Kim
Hyung‐Jun Yoo
Won Il Jang
Eun Kyung Paik
Chul Ju Han
Byung‐Hee Lee
author_facet Young‐Seok Seo
Mi‐Sook Kim
Hyung‐Jun Yoo
Won Il Jang
Eun Kyung Paik
Chul Ju Han
Byung‐Hee Lee
author_sort Young‐Seok Seo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The aim of this study is to compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) smaller than 3 cm. A Markov cohort model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients aged 60–65 years with small HCCs who had undergone either RFA or SBRT and were followed up over their remaining life expectancy. The inclusion criteria were: (1) HCC ≤3 cm in diameter with ≤ 3 nodules; (2) absence of extrahepatic metastasis or portal/hepatic vein invasion; (3) Child‐Pugh Class A or B. Twenty thousand virtual patients were randomly assigned to undergo RFA or SBRT. Predicted life expectancy was 6.452 and 6.371 years in the RFA and SBRT groups, respectively. The probability distributions of the expected overall survival were nearly identical. The 95% confidence intervals were 6.25–6.66 and 6.17–6.58 years for RFA and SBRT, respectively. The difference between RFA and SBRT was insignificant (P = 0.2884). Two‐way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that if the tumor is 2–3 cm, SBRT is the preferred treatment option. Our Markov model has shown that expected overall survival of SBRT is nearly identical to RFA in HCCs smaller than 3 cm, but SBRT may have an advantage for tumors 2 cm and larger. A randomized trial is required to confirm these findings.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:29:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d929051c61e446538d33edbc3e0f23f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:29:34Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d929051c61e446538d33edbc3e0f23f12022-12-22T03:46:08ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342016-11-015113094310110.1002/cam4.893Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysisYoung‐Seok Seo0Mi‐Sook Kim1Hyung‐Jun Yoo2Won Il Jang3Eun Kyung Paik4Chul Ju Han5Byung‐Hee Lee6Department of Radiation Oncology Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaDepartment of Radiology Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences Seoul KoreaAbstract The aim of this study is to compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) smaller than 3 cm. A Markov cohort model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients aged 60–65 years with small HCCs who had undergone either RFA or SBRT and were followed up over their remaining life expectancy. The inclusion criteria were: (1) HCC ≤3 cm in diameter with ≤ 3 nodules; (2) absence of extrahepatic metastasis or portal/hepatic vein invasion; (3) Child‐Pugh Class A or B. Twenty thousand virtual patients were randomly assigned to undergo RFA or SBRT. Predicted life expectancy was 6.452 and 6.371 years in the RFA and SBRT groups, respectively. The probability distributions of the expected overall survival were nearly identical. The 95% confidence intervals were 6.25–6.66 and 6.17–6.58 years for RFA and SBRT, respectively. The difference between RFA and SBRT was insignificant (P = 0.2884). Two‐way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that if the tumor is 2–3 cm, SBRT is the preferred treatment option. Our Markov model has shown that expected overall survival of SBRT is nearly identical to RFA in HCCs smaller than 3 cm, but SBRT may have an advantage for tumors 2 cm and larger. A randomized trial is required to confirm these findings.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.893Hepatocellular carcinomaMarkovradiofrequency ablationstereotactic
spellingShingle Young‐Seok Seo
Mi‐Sook Kim
Hyung‐Jun Yoo
Won Il Jang
Eun Kyung Paik
Chul Ju Han
Byung‐Hee Lee
Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis
Cancer Medicine
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Markov
radiofrequency ablation
stereotactic
title Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis
title_full Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis
title_fullStr Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis
title_full_unstemmed Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis
title_short Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model‐based analysis
title_sort radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma a markov model based analysis
topic Hepatocellular carcinoma
Markov
radiofrequency ablation
stereotactic
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.893
work_keys_str_mv AT youngseokseo radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis
AT misookkim radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis
AT hyungjunyoo radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis
AT woniljang radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis
AT eunkyungpaik radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis
AT chuljuhan radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis
AT byungheelee radiofrequencyablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaamarkovmodelbasedanalysis