Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background. We assessed the usefulness of a longitudinal strain adjusted to regional thickness in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Indeed, with conventional software, the width of the region of interest (ROI) is the same over the entire myocardial wall, wherein the software analyzes only partially...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Urtado, Hélène Hergault, Stephen Binsse, Vincent Aidan, Mounir Ouadahi, Catherine Szymanski, Sophie Mallet, Marie Hauguel-Moreau, Robert Yves Carlier, Olivier Dubourg, Nicolas Mansencal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2089
_version_ 1797434524834988032
author Sophie Urtado
Hélène Hergault
Stephen Binsse
Vincent Aidan
Mounir Ouadahi
Catherine Szymanski
Sophie Mallet
Marie Hauguel-Moreau
Robert Yves Carlier
Olivier Dubourg
Nicolas Mansencal
author_facet Sophie Urtado
Hélène Hergault
Stephen Binsse
Vincent Aidan
Mounir Ouadahi
Catherine Szymanski
Sophie Mallet
Marie Hauguel-Moreau
Robert Yves Carlier
Olivier Dubourg
Nicolas Mansencal
author_sort Sophie Urtado
collection DOAJ
description Background. We assessed the usefulness of a longitudinal strain adjusted to regional thickness in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Indeed, with conventional software, the width of the region of interest (ROI) is the same over the entire myocardial wall, wherein the software analyzes only partially the left ventricular (LV) hypertrophic segments. Methods. We included 110 patients: 55 patients with HCM (HCM group) and 55 healthy subjects (age- and sex-matched control group). The global longitudinal strain (GLS) and regional strain for each of the 17 segments was calculated with standard software (for two groups) and with software adjusted to the myocardial wall thickness (for the HCM group). Results. GLS was significantly decreased in the HCM group compared to the control group (−15.1 ± 4.8% versus −20.5 ± 4.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). In the HCM group, GLS (standard method versus adjusted to thickness) measurements were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.34). Interestingly, the regional strain adjusted to thickness was significantly lower than the standard strain in the hypertrophic segments, especially in the basal inferoseptal segment (<i>p</i> = 0.0002), median inferoseptal segment (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and median anteroseptal segment (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The strain adjusted to thickness was still significantly lower in the most hypertrophic segments (≥20 mm) (−3.7 ± 3%, versus −5.9 ± 4.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.049 in the basal inferoseptal segment and −5.7 ± 3.5% versus −8.3 ± 4.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007 in the median inferoseptal segment). In the segments with significant myocardial fibrosis, the longitudinal strain adjusted to thickness was significantly lower than the conventional strain (−8.3 ± 3.3% versus −11.4 ± 4.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The analysis of the strain adjusted to thickness had a better feasibility (97.5% versus 99%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Conclusions. The analysis of a longitudinal strain adjusted to regional thickness is feasible in HCM and allows a better evaluation of myocardial deformation, especially in the most LV hypertrophic segments.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:33:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d932d2533e03472f8e576f121960e45e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:33:32Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d932d2533e03472f8e576f121960e45e2023-12-01T21:06:26ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-04-01118208910.3390/jcm11082089Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic CardiomyopathySophie Urtado0Hélène Hergault1Stephen Binsse2Vincent Aidan3Mounir Ouadahi4Catherine Szymanski5Sophie Mallet6Marie Hauguel-Moreau7Robert Yves Carlier8Olivier Dubourg9Nicolas Mansencal10Department of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Radiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Radiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceDepartment of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin (UVSQ), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, FranceBackground. We assessed the usefulness of a longitudinal strain adjusted to regional thickness in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Indeed, with conventional software, the width of the region of interest (ROI) is the same over the entire myocardial wall, wherein the software analyzes only partially the left ventricular (LV) hypertrophic segments. Methods. We included 110 patients: 55 patients with HCM (HCM group) and 55 healthy subjects (age- and sex-matched control group). The global longitudinal strain (GLS) and regional strain for each of the 17 segments was calculated with standard software (for two groups) and with software adjusted to the myocardial wall thickness (for the HCM group). Results. GLS was significantly decreased in the HCM group compared to the control group (−15.1 ± 4.8% versus −20.5 ± 4.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). In the HCM group, GLS (standard method versus adjusted to thickness) measurements were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.34). Interestingly, the regional strain adjusted to thickness was significantly lower than the standard strain in the hypertrophic segments, especially in the basal inferoseptal segment (<i>p</i> = 0.0002), median inferoseptal segment (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and median anteroseptal segment (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The strain adjusted to thickness was still significantly lower in the most hypertrophic segments (≥20 mm) (−3.7 ± 3%, versus −5.9 ± 4.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.049 in the basal inferoseptal segment and −5.7 ± 3.5% versus −8.3 ± 4.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007 in the median inferoseptal segment). In the segments with significant myocardial fibrosis, the longitudinal strain adjusted to thickness was significantly lower than the conventional strain (−8.3 ± 3.3% versus −11.4 ± 4.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The analysis of the strain adjusted to thickness had a better feasibility (97.5% versus 99%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Conclusions. The analysis of a longitudinal strain adjusted to regional thickness is feasible in HCM and allows a better evaluation of myocardial deformation, especially in the most LV hypertrophic segments.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2089hypertrophic cardiomyopathystrainfibrosis
spellingShingle Sophie Urtado
Hélène Hergault
Stephen Binsse
Vincent Aidan
Mounir Ouadahi
Catherine Szymanski
Sophie Mallet
Marie Hauguel-Moreau
Robert Yves Carlier
Olivier Dubourg
Nicolas Mansencal
Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Journal of Clinical Medicine
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
strain
fibrosis
title Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
title_full Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
title_short Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain Adjusted to Regional Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
title_sort usefulness of longitudinal strain adjusted to regional thickness in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
topic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
strain
fibrosis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2089
work_keys_str_mv AT sophieurtado usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT helenehergault usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT stephenbinsse usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT vincentaidan usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT mounirouadahi usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT catherineszymanski usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT sophiemallet usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT mariehauguelmoreau usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT robertyvescarlier usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT olivierdubourg usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy
AT nicolasmansencal usefulnessoflongitudinalstrainadjustedtoregionalthicknessinhypertrophiccardiomyopathy