Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI

Abstract Background While ultrasound (US) measures of the subacromial space (SAS) have demonstrated excellent reliability, measurements are typically captured by experts with extensive ultrasound experience. Further, the agreement between US measured SAS width and other imaging modalities has not be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen M. Boulanger, Alexandra Mahna, Talia Alenabi, Anthony A. Gatti, Oriana Culig, Loriann M. Hynes, Jaclyn N. Chopp-Hurley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04482-1
_version_ 1797376872918548480
author Stephen M. Boulanger
Alexandra Mahna
Talia Alenabi
Anthony A. Gatti
Oriana Culig
Loriann M. Hynes
Jaclyn N. Chopp-Hurley
author_facet Stephen M. Boulanger
Alexandra Mahna
Talia Alenabi
Anthony A. Gatti
Oriana Culig
Loriann M. Hynes
Jaclyn N. Chopp-Hurley
author_sort Stephen M. Boulanger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background While ultrasound (US) measures of the subacromial space (SAS) have demonstrated excellent reliability, measurements are typically captured by experts with extensive ultrasound experience. Further, the agreement between US measured SAS width and other imaging modalities has not been explored. This research evaluated the agreement between SAS measures captured by novice and expert raters and between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study also evaluated the effect of US transducer tilt on measured SAS. Methods Nine men and nine women participated in this study. US images were captured by a novice and expert with the participant in both seated and supine positions. An inclinometer was fixed to the US probe to measure transducer tilt. SAS width was measured in real time from freeze framed images. MRI images were captured, and the humerus and acromion manually segmented. The SAS width was measured using a custom algorithm. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between novice and expert raters were 0.74 and 0.63 for seated and supine positions, respectively. Intra-rater agreement was high for both novice (ICC = 0.83–0.84) and expert (ICC ≥ 0.94) raters. Agreement between US and MRI was poor (ICC = 0.21–0.49) but linearly related. Conclusions Moderate agreement between novice and expert raters was demonstrated, while the agreement between US and MRI was poor. High intra-rater reliability within each rater suggests that US measures of the SAS may be completed by a novice with introductory training.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:45:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d94033bfebe64c68b0bba7e512f2aafe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:45:52Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-d94033bfebe64c68b0bba7e512f2aafe2023-12-24T12:24:36ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-12-0118111210.1186/s13018-023-04482-1Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRIStephen M. Boulanger0Alexandra Mahna1Talia Alenabi2Anthony A. Gatti3Oriana Culig4Loriann M. Hynes5Jaclyn N. Chopp-Hurley6School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York UniversitySchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York UniversityDepartment of Kinesiology, University of WaterlooDepartment of Radiology, Stanford UniversitySchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York UniversitySchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York UniversitySchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York UniversityAbstract Background While ultrasound (US) measures of the subacromial space (SAS) have demonstrated excellent reliability, measurements are typically captured by experts with extensive ultrasound experience. Further, the agreement between US measured SAS width and other imaging modalities has not been explored. This research evaluated the agreement between SAS measures captured by novice and expert raters and between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study also evaluated the effect of US transducer tilt on measured SAS. Methods Nine men and nine women participated in this study. US images were captured by a novice and expert with the participant in both seated and supine positions. An inclinometer was fixed to the US probe to measure transducer tilt. SAS width was measured in real time from freeze framed images. MRI images were captured, and the humerus and acromion manually segmented. The SAS width was measured using a custom algorithm. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between novice and expert raters were 0.74 and 0.63 for seated and supine positions, respectively. Intra-rater agreement was high for both novice (ICC = 0.83–0.84) and expert (ICC ≥ 0.94) raters. Agreement between US and MRI was poor (ICC = 0.21–0.49) but linearly related. Conclusions Moderate agreement between novice and expert raters was demonstrated, while the agreement between US and MRI was poor. High intra-rater reliability within each rater suggests that US measures of the SAS may be completed by a novice with introductory training.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04482-1ShoulderReliabilityMagnetic resonance imagingUltrasound
spellingShingle Stephen M. Boulanger
Alexandra Mahna
Talia Alenabi
Anthony A. Gatti
Oriana Culig
Loriann M. Hynes
Jaclyn N. Chopp-Hurley
Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Shoulder
Reliability
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrasound
title Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI
title_full Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI
title_fullStr Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI
title_short Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI
title_sort investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and mri
topic Shoulder
Reliability
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrasound
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04482-1
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenmboulanger investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri
AT alexandramahna investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri
AT taliaalenabi investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri
AT anthonyagatti investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri
AT orianaculig investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri
AT loriannmhynes investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri
AT jaclynnchopphurley investigatingthereliabilityandvalidityofsubacromialspacemeasurementsusingultrasoundandmri