Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes

Within the framework of the implementation of Measure 18101 "Seismic Resistance of Systems and Building Structures" of the "Complex (Consolidated) Safety Upgrade Program" for NPP Power Units of the SE NNEGC Energoatom, a number of report documents were developed with the results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marat A. Mustafin, Dmytro I. Ryzhov, Oleksandr P. Shuhailo, Oleksii P. Shuhailo, Roman Ya. Buriak, Taras V. Pidhaietskyi, Yana D. Kruhlii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NAS of Ukraine, A. Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems 2020-03-01
Series:Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal-me.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2020_1_5_eng.pdf
_version_ 1819027352475140096
author Marat A. Mustafin
Dmytro I. Ryzhov
Oleksandr P. Shuhailo
Oleksii P. Shuhailo
Roman Ya. Buriak
Taras V. Pidhaietskyi
Yana D. Kruhlii
author_facet Marat A. Mustafin
Dmytro I. Ryzhov
Oleksandr P. Shuhailo
Oleksii P. Shuhailo
Roman Ya. Buriak
Taras V. Pidhaietskyi
Yana D. Kruhlii
author_sort Marat A. Mustafin
collection DOAJ
description Within the framework of the implementation of Measure 18101 "Seismic Resistance of Systems and Building Structures" of the "Complex (Consolidated) Safety Upgrade Program" for NPP Power Units of the SE NNEGC Energoatom, a number of report documents were developed with the results of calculations of seismic resistance according to the approaches in NP 306.2.208-2016 "Requirements for seismic design and safety assessment of nuclear power plant units", PNAE G-7-002-86 "Standards for Calculating the Strength of Equipment and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Plants" and the HCLPF (High Confidence Low Probability of Failure) seismic margin value according to the approaches in the "Methods of the Design Calculation of the Seismic Resistance of Components of Operating NPPs within the seismic margin assessment (SMA) method MT-T.0.03.326-13". In accordance with the basic requirements of the SMA method, the determination of the HCLPF value was made on the basis of the stress-strain state (SSS) analysis for the zone with the maximum value of the seismic stress component (σS). However, in the framework of the state nuclear and radiation safety examinations of report documents of the SE NNEGC Energoatom, a number of calculation cases were detected where the above SMA method approach yielded insufficiently conservative HCLPF calculation results. It is currently relevant to determine the representative cross-sections of the design model of the elements for which the HCLPF value should be specified. This paper considers the example-based design case that demonstrated the insufficient conservatism of HCLPF calculation results in choosing a non-representative cross-section. Also considered are aspects of performing the analysis of the seismic margin resistance of NPP systems and elements with using specialized tools of modern computational complexes to eliminate errors in determining representative cross-sections.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:41:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9530575f8804fb6b5c73f873b132f1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2709-2984
2709-2992
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:41:06Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher NAS of Ukraine, A. Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems
record_format Article
series Journal of Mechanical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-d9530575f8804fb6b5c73f873b132f1b2022-12-21T19:14:15ZengNAS of Ukraine, A. Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering ProblemsJournal of Mechanical Engineering2709-29842709-29922020-03-01231465210.15407/pmach2020.01.046Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational ComplexesMarat A. Mustafin0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-6223Dmytro I. Ryzhov1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-5009Oleksandr P. Shuhailo2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-0299Oleksii P. Shuhailo3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0997-7830Roman Ya. Buriak4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-7956Taras V. Pidhaietskyi5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4125-4846Yana D. Kruhlii6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-6007State Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyState Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyState Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyState Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyState Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyState Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyState Scientific Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation SafetyWithin the framework of the implementation of Measure 18101 "Seismic Resistance of Systems and Building Structures" of the "Complex (Consolidated) Safety Upgrade Program" for NPP Power Units of the SE NNEGC Energoatom, a number of report documents were developed with the results of calculations of seismic resistance according to the approaches in NP 306.2.208-2016 "Requirements for seismic design and safety assessment of nuclear power plant units", PNAE G-7-002-86 "Standards for Calculating the Strength of Equipment and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Plants" and the HCLPF (High Confidence Low Probability of Failure) seismic margin value according to the approaches in the "Methods of the Design Calculation of the Seismic Resistance of Components of Operating NPPs within the seismic margin assessment (SMA) method MT-T.0.03.326-13". In accordance with the basic requirements of the SMA method, the determination of the HCLPF value was made on the basis of the stress-strain state (SSS) analysis for the zone with the maximum value of the seismic stress component (σS). However, in the framework of the state nuclear and radiation safety examinations of report documents of the SE NNEGC Energoatom, a number of calculation cases were detected where the above SMA method approach yielded insufficiently conservative HCLPF calculation results. It is currently relevant to determine the representative cross-sections of the design model of the elements for which the HCLPF value should be specified. This paper considers the example-based design case that demonstrated the insufficient conservatism of HCLPF calculation results in choosing a non-representative cross-section. Also considered are aspects of performing the analysis of the seismic margin resistance of NPP systems and elements with using specialized tools of modern computational complexes to eliminate errors in determining representative cross-sections.https://journal-me.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2020_1_5_eng.pdfseismic resistanceseismic margin resistanceseismic margin factorstressesrepresentative cross-section
spellingShingle Marat A. Mustafin
Dmytro I. Ryzhov
Oleksandr P. Shuhailo
Oleksii P. Shuhailo
Roman Ya. Buriak
Taras V. Pidhaietskyi
Yana D. Kruhlii
Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes
Journal of Mechanical Engineering
seismic resistance
seismic margin resistance
seismic margin factor
stresses
representative cross-section
title Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes
title_full Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes
title_fullStr Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes
title_short Application Peculiarities of the SMA Method in the Estimation of NPP Structures, Systems and Elements by Means of Computational Complexes
title_sort application peculiarities of the sma method in the estimation of npp structures systems and elements by means of computational complexes
topic seismic resistance
seismic margin resistance
seismic margin factor
stresses
representative cross-section
url https://journal-me.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2020_1_5_eng.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT maratamustafin applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes
AT dmytroiryzhov applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes
AT oleksandrpshuhailo applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes
AT oleksiipshuhailo applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes
AT romanyaburiak applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes
AT tarasvpidhaietskyi applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes
AT yanadkruhlii applicationpeculiaritiesofthesmamethodintheestimationofnppstructuressystemsandelementsbymeansofcomputationalcomplexes