Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight

Introduction: Fetal weight, in conjunction with gestational age, is an important indicator of pregnancy outcome. Accurate estimation of fetal weight is of paramount importance in the management of labor and delivery and it also help in avoidance of complications associated with fetal excessive or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr.Tejalben Kansara, Dr. Nikhil Anand, Dr. Neha Makwana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: B.J.Medical College Development Society, Ahmedabad 2022-12-01
Series:BJ Kines: National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjkines.com/vol14(2)December2022/article%2015.pdf
_version_ 1797960151594958848
author Dr.Tejalben Kansara
Dr. Nikhil Anand
Dr. Neha Makwana
author_facet Dr.Tejalben Kansara
Dr. Nikhil Anand
Dr. Neha Makwana
author_sort Dr.Tejalben Kansara
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Fetal weight, in conjunction with gestational age, is an important indicator of pregnancy outcome. Accurate estimation of fetal weight is of paramount importance in the management of labor and delivery and it also help in avoidance of complications associated with fetal excessive or low-birth-weight babies, thereby decreasing perinatal morbidity and mortality. Various clinical formulae like Johnson’s formula & Dare’s formula are in use for fetal weight estimation. Aim of the study was to assess the fetal weight in term pregnancy by various clinical methods- Dare’s formula & Johnson’s formula and its comparison and correlation with actual birth weight. Materials & Method: It was a prospective observational study of 334 women at term pregnancy at GMERS medical college & Hospital, Vadnagar from April 2021 to July 2021. The formulas used in this study were: Johnson’s formula and Dare’s formula. The measurements were compared with actual birth weight after the birth of baby. Results: The mean actual birth weight was 2759.07±466.15 grams. The mean estimated birth weight by Dare’s and Johnson’s method was 2845.79±453.43 grams and grams 2990.81±413.68respectively. Dare’s method was more accurate and had least maximum and minimum error than Johnson’s method. Conclusion: Dare’s formula is an inexpensive method for fetal birth weight estimation. It can be used on large scale because of its low cost, ease of use, and need for little training as the setup for ultra sonographic evaluation is not readily available in rural setups.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:40:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d97033dd82bc4351a1e4ddf997c20b33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2231-6140
2395-7859
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:40:49Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher B.J.Medical College Development Society, Ahmedabad
record_format Article
series BJ Kines: National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d97033dd82bc4351a1e4ddf997c20b332023-01-06T06:04:57ZengB.J.Medical College Development Society, AhmedabadBJ Kines: National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences2231-61402395-78592022-12-011429910510.56018/bjkines20221215Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth WeightDr.Tejalben Kansara0Dr. Nikhil Anand1Dr. Neha Makwana2GMERS Medical College & Hospital, VadnagarGMERS Medical College & Hospital, VadnagarGMERS Medical College & Hospital, VadnagarIntroduction: Fetal weight, in conjunction with gestational age, is an important indicator of pregnancy outcome. Accurate estimation of fetal weight is of paramount importance in the management of labor and delivery and it also help in avoidance of complications associated with fetal excessive or low-birth-weight babies, thereby decreasing perinatal morbidity and mortality. Various clinical formulae like Johnson’s formula & Dare’s formula are in use for fetal weight estimation. Aim of the study was to assess the fetal weight in term pregnancy by various clinical methods- Dare’s formula & Johnson’s formula and its comparison and correlation with actual birth weight. Materials & Method: It was a prospective observational study of 334 women at term pregnancy at GMERS medical college & Hospital, Vadnagar from April 2021 to July 2021. The formulas used in this study were: Johnson’s formula and Dare’s formula. The measurements were compared with actual birth weight after the birth of baby. Results: The mean actual birth weight was 2759.07±466.15 grams. The mean estimated birth weight by Dare’s and Johnson’s method was 2845.79±453.43 grams and grams 2990.81±413.68respectively. Dare’s method was more accurate and had least maximum and minimum error than Johnson’s method. Conclusion: Dare’s formula is an inexpensive method for fetal birth weight estimation. It can be used on large scale because of its low cost, ease of use, and need for little training as the setup for ultra sonographic evaluation is not readily available in rural setups.https://bjkines.com/vol14(2)December2022/article%2015.pdfabdominal girthactual birth weightdare’s formulaestimated birth weightjohnson’s formula
spellingShingle Dr.Tejalben Kansara
Dr. Nikhil Anand
Dr. Neha Makwana
Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight
BJ Kines: National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences
abdominal girth
actual birth weight
dare’s formula
estimated birth weight
johnson’s formula
title Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight
title_full Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight
title_fullStr Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight
title_short Comparative Study for Estimation of Fetal Weight by Various Clinical Methods and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight
title_sort comparative study for estimation of fetal weight by various clinical methods and its correlation with actual birth weight
topic abdominal girth
actual birth weight
dare’s formula
estimated birth weight
johnson’s formula
url https://bjkines.com/vol14(2)December2022/article%2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT drtejalbenkansara comparativestudyforestimationoffetalweightbyvariousclinicalmethodsanditscorrelationwithactualbirthweight
AT drnikhilanand comparativestudyforestimationoffetalweightbyvariousclinicalmethodsanditscorrelationwithactualbirthweight
AT drnehamakwana comparativestudyforestimationoffetalweightbyvariousclinicalmethodsanditscorrelationwithactualbirthweight