Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors

Age-related mobility research often highlights significant mobility differences comparing neurotypical young and older adults, while neglecting to report mobility outcomes for middle-aged adults. Moreover, these analyses regularly do not determine which measures of mobility can discriminate groups i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clayton W. Swanson, Brett W. Fling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/19/6644
_version_ 1797515741063282688
author Clayton W. Swanson
Brett W. Fling
author_facet Clayton W. Swanson
Brett W. Fling
author_sort Clayton W. Swanson
collection DOAJ
description Age-related mobility research often highlights significant mobility differences comparing neurotypical young and older adults, while neglecting to report mobility outcomes for middle-aged adults. Moreover, these analyses regularly do not determine which measures of mobility can discriminate groups into their age brackets. Thus, the current study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis for commonly performed aspects of mobility (walking, turning, sit-to-stand, and balance) to determine which variables were significantly different and furthermore, able to discriminate between neurotypical young adults (YAs), middle-aged adults (MAAs), and older adults (OAs). This study recruited 20 YAs, 20 MAAs, and 20 OAs. Participants came into the laboratory and completed mobility testing while wearing wireless inertial sensors. Mobility tests assessed included three distinct two-minute walks, 360° turns, five times sit-to-stands, and a clinical balance test, capturing 99 distinct mobility metrics. Of the various mobility tests assessed, only 360° turning measures demonstrated significance between YAs and MAAs, although the capacity to discriminate between groups was achieved for gait and turning measures. A variety of mobility measures demonstrated significance between MAAs and OAs, and furthermore discrimination was achieved for each mobility test. These results indicate greater mobility differences between MAAs and OAs, although discrimination is achievable for both group comparisons.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:51:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9762d6b1e7d4792ab9fa95e9c7a47cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:51:34Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-d9762d6b1e7d4792ab9fa95e9c7a47cc2023-11-22T16:49:13ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-10-012119664410.3390/s21196644Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial SensorsClayton W. Swanson0Brett W. Fling1Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1601 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32608, USADepartment of Health & Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USAAge-related mobility research often highlights significant mobility differences comparing neurotypical young and older adults, while neglecting to report mobility outcomes for middle-aged adults. Moreover, these analyses regularly do not determine which measures of mobility can discriminate groups into their age brackets. Thus, the current study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis for commonly performed aspects of mobility (walking, turning, sit-to-stand, and balance) to determine which variables were significantly different and furthermore, able to discriminate between neurotypical young adults (YAs), middle-aged adults (MAAs), and older adults (OAs). This study recruited 20 YAs, 20 MAAs, and 20 OAs. Participants came into the laboratory and completed mobility testing while wearing wireless inertial sensors. Mobility tests assessed included three distinct two-minute walks, 360° turns, five times sit-to-stands, and a clinical balance test, capturing 99 distinct mobility metrics. Of the various mobility tests assessed, only 360° turning measures demonstrated significance between YAs and MAAs, although the capacity to discriminate between groups was achieved for gait and turning measures. A variety of mobility measures demonstrated significance between MAAs and OAs, and furthermore discrimination was achieved for each mobility test. These results indicate greater mobility differences between MAAs and OAs, although discrimination is achievable for both group comparisons.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/19/6644mobilityagingmiddle-aged adultsyoung adultsolder adultsgait
spellingShingle Clayton W. Swanson
Brett W. Fling
Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors
Sensors
mobility
aging
middle-aged adults
young adults
older adults
gait
title Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors
title_full Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors
title_fullStr Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors
title_short Discriminative Mobility Characteristics between Neurotypical Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults Using Wireless Inertial Sensors
title_sort discriminative mobility characteristics between neurotypical young middle aged and older adults using wireless inertial sensors
topic mobility
aging
middle-aged adults
young adults
older adults
gait
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/19/6644
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonwswanson discriminativemobilitycharacteristicsbetweenneurotypicalyoungmiddleagedandolderadultsusingwirelessinertialsensors
AT brettwfling discriminativemobilitycharacteristicsbetweenneurotypicalyoungmiddleagedandolderadultsusingwirelessinertialsensors