Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

Background. Acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (AASBO) is a common surgical emergency requiring immediate interventions. AASBO is a usual indication for both small bowel resection and adhesiolysis. Postoperative adhesions cause 60% of small bowel obstructions.Materials and methods. An analysis o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sh. V. Timerbulatov, V. M. Sibaev, V. M. Timerbulatov, M. V. Zabelin, M. V. Timerbulatov, R. B. Sagitov, A. R. Gafarova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bashkir State Medical University 2022-06-01
Series:Креативная хирургия и онкология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/672
_version_ 1797872379271053312
author Sh. V. Timerbulatov
V. M. Sibaev
V. M. Timerbulatov
M. V. Zabelin
M. V. Timerbulatov
R. B. Sagitov
A. R. Gafarova
author_facet Sh. V. Timerbulatov
V. M. Sibaev
V. M. Timerbulatov
M. V. Zabelin
M. V. Timerbulatov
R. B. Sagitov
A. R. Gafarova
author_sort Sh. V. Timerbulatov
collection DOAJ
description Background. Acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (AASBO) is a common surgical emergency requiring immediate interventions. AASBO is a usual indication for both small bowel resection and adhesiolysis. Postoperative adhesions cause 60% of small bowel obstructions.Materials and methods. An analysis of treatment outcomes is presented for 197 acute adhesive small bowel obstruction patients; 63 patients had urgent laparotomy, and 134 were scheduled for laparoscopy. The examination included physical, laboratory, radiological methods (abdominal radiography, ultrasound, CT scan), laparoscopy and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring.Results and discussion. Of 134 patients scheduled for laparoscopic adhesiolysis, only 46.2% had laparoscopy completed, and 53.8% required conversion to laparotomy. The main rationale for conversion were massive adhesions, intraoperative haemodynamic instability, a need for intestinal decompression, as well as rare complications. Laparoscopic operations were reported with the lower vs. laparotomy rates of surgical complications (6.4  vs. 12.69%), mortality (6  vs. 6.3%), shorter hospital stays (6.5 vs. 12 days) and operation times (75 vs. 118 min, respectively).Conclusion. Laparoscopic surgery in acute adhesive small bowel obstruction was feasible in 31.47% patients and in 46.2% — after a diagnostic laparoscopy; however, a thorough patients selection for laparoscopic adhesiolysis is necessary. The first estimated should be the patient’s haemodynamic stability, the severities of condition, adhesions and comorbid cardiorespiratory pathology. Grade I—II adhesions are an indication for laparoscopic surgery.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T00:57:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d97b7f981e154cb58cdd768783f1ce9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2307-0501
2076-3093
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T00:57:48Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Bashkir State Medical University
record_format Article
series Креативная хирургия и онкология
spelling doaj.art-d97b7f981e154cb58cdd768783f1ce9b2023-03-13T10:01:10ZengBashkir State Medical UniversityКреативная хирургия и онкология2307-05012076-30932022-06-01121354210.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-1-35-42463Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic SurgerySh. V. Timerbulatov0V. M. Sibaev1V. M. Timerbulatov2M. V. Zabelin3M. V. Timerbulatov4R. B. Sagitov5A. R. Gafarova6Башкирский государственный медицинский университетБашкирский государственный медицинский университетБашкирский государственный медицинский университетБашкирский государственный медицинский университетБашкирский государственный медицинский университетБашкирский государственный медицинский университетБашкирский государственный медицинский университетBackground. Acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (AASBO) is a common surgical emergency requiring immediate interventions. AASBO is a usual indication for both small bowel resection and adhesiolysis. Postoperative adhesions cause 60% of small bowel obstructions.Materials and methods. An analysis of treatment outcomes is presented for 197 acute adhesive small bowel obstruction patients; 63 patients had urgent laparotomy, and 134 were scheduled for laparoscopy. The examination included physical, laboratory, radiological methods (abdominal radiography, ultrasound, CT scan), laparoscopy and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring.Results and discussion. Of 134 patients scheduled for laparoscopic adhesiolysis, only 46.2% had laparoscopy completed, and 53.8% required conversion to laparotomy. The main rationale for conversion were massive adhesions, intraoperative haemodynamic instability, a need for intestinal decompression, as well as rare complications. Laparoscopic operations were reported with the lower vs. laparotomy rates of surgical complications (6.4  vs. 12.69%), mortality (6  vs. 6.3%), shorter hospital stays (6.5 vs. 12 days) and operation times (75 vs. 118 min, respectively).Conclusion. Laparoscopic surgery in acute adhesive small bowel obstruction was feasible in 31.47% patients and in 46.2% — after a diagnostic laparoscopy; however, a thorough patients selection for laparoscopic adhesiolysis is necessary. The first estimated should be the patient’s haemodynamic stability, the severities of condition, adhesions and comorbid cardiorespiratory pathology. Grade I—II adhesions are an indication for laparoscopic surgery.https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/672острая кишечная непроходимостьспайкипослеоперационные осложнениялапароскопический адгезиолизискомпьютерная томографияискусственный пневмоперитонеуминтраоперационный мониторинг
spellingShingle Sh. V. Timerbulatov
V. M. Sibaev
V. M. Timerbulatov
M. V. Zabelin
M. V. Timerbulatov
R. B. Sagitov
A. R. Gafarova
Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
Креативная хирургия и онкология
острая кишечная непроходимость
спайки
послеоперационные осложнения
лапароскопический адгезиолизис
компьютерная томография
искусственный пневмоперитонеум
интраоперационный мониторинг
title Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
title_full Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
title_fullStr Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
title_short Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
title_sort acute adhesive small bowel obstruction a comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic surgery
topic острая кишечная непроходимость
спайки
послеоперационные осложнения
лапароскопический адгезиолизис
компьютерная томография
искусственный пневмоперитонеум
интраоперационный мониторинг
url https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/672
work_keys_str_mv AT shvtimerbulatov acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery
AT vmsibaev acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery
AT vmtimerbulatov acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery
AT mvzabelin acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery
AT mvtimerbulatov acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery
AT rbsagitov acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery
AT argafarova acuteadhesivesmallbowelobstructionacomparativeanalysisofopenandlaparoscopicsurgery