Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training.
<h4>Purpose</h4>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has proven to be effective in improving endurance capacity and muscle endurance. However, its potential to improve other aspects of physical performance such as strength and power has not been well explored, and most research studie...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281737 |
| _version_ | 1797904247571873792 |
|---|---|
| author | María Venegas-Carro Joshua T Herring Simon Riehle Andreas Kramer |
| author_facet | María Venegas-Carro Joshua T Herring Simon Riehle Andreas Kramer |
| author_sort | María Venegas-Carro |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Purpose</h4>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has proven to be effective in improving endurance capacity and muscle endurance. However, its potential to improve other aspects of physical performance such as strength and power has not been well explored, and most research studies used only running and cycling as exercise modalities. Here, we compared the effects of jumping versus running as exercise modalities during a 6-week HIIT.<h4>Methods</h4>46 participants (24±3 years, 171±9 cm, 68±13 kg, 22 women) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: countermovement jump training, running training, or control. The two training groups underwent a 6-week HIIT with 3 training sessions per week. Both training protocols had identical training frequency, number of series and work/rest durations (on average 7 series of 25s, with a rest of 25s between series). Before and after the training period, aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance were assessed.<h4>Results</h4>Analyses of variance revealed a significant group*time interaction effect for maximal aerobic capacity (p = 0.004), and post hoc analyses showed a significant increase in the running group (p < .001, +7.6%). Analyses of the maximal voluntary contraction revealed only a significant increase in the jumping group (plantar flexion +12.8%, knee extension +8.2%). No interaction effects were found for maximal power or jump height.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Despite identical programming, the choice of exercise mode profoundly affected the training adaptations: the running group significantly increased aerobic capacity, and the jump group significantly increased leg strength. These results underline the importance of exercise modality in physical performance adaptations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T09:45:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d98129fba6854007bb61796ffb3bdcee |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T09:45:48Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-d98129fba6854007bb61796ffb3bdcee2023-02-17T05:32:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01182e028173710.1371/journal.pone.0281737Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training.María Venegas-CarroJoshua T HerringSimon RiehleAndreas Kramer<h4>Purpose</h4>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has proven to be effective in improving endurance capacity and muscle endurance. However, its potential to improve other aspects of physical performance such as strength and power has not been well explored, and most research studies used only running and cycling as exercise modalities. Here, we compared the effects of jumping versus running as exercise modalities during a 6-week HIIT.<h4>Methods</h4>46 participants (24±3 years, 171±9 cm, 68±13 kg, 22 women) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: countermovement jump training, running training, or control. The two training groups underwent a 6-week HIIT with 3 training sessions per week. Both training protocols had identical training frequency, number of series and work/rest durations (on average 7 series of 25s, with a rest of 25s between series). Before and after the training period, aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance were assessed.<h4>Results</h4>Analyses of variance revealed a significant group*time interaction effect for maximal aerobic capacity (p = 0.004), and post hoc analyses showed a significant increase in the running group (p < .001, +7.6%). Analyses of the maximal voluntary contraction revealed only a significant increase in the jumping group (plantar flexion +12.8%, knee extension +8.2%). No interaction effects were found for maximal power or jump height.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Despite identical programming, the choice of exercise mode profoundly affected the training adaptations: the running group significantly increased aerobic capacity, and the jump group significantly increased leg strength. These results underline the importance of exercise modality in physical performance adaptations.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281737 |
| spellingShingle | María Venegas-Carro Joshua T Herring Simon Riehle Andreas Kramer Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training. PLoS ONE |
| title | Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training. |
| title_full | Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training. |
| title_fullStr | Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training. |
| title_short | Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training. |
| title_sort | jumping vs running effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six week high intensity interval training |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281737 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariavenegascarro jumpingvsrunningeffectsofexercisemodalityonaerobiccapacityandneuromuscularperformanceafterasixweekhighintensityintervaltraining AT joshuatherring jumpingvsrunningeffectsofexercisemodalityonaerobiccapacityandneuromuscularperformanceafterasixweekhighintensityintervaltraining AT simonriehle jumpingvsrunningeffectsofexercisemodalityonaerobiccapacityandneuromuscularperformanceafterasixweekhighintensityintervaltraining AT andreaskramer jumpingvsrunningeffectsofexercisemodalityonaerobiccapacityandneuromuscularperformanceafterasixweekhighintensityintervaltraining |