A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination

In the commonly used approach, the lifetime of a superheater is estimated by characteristic values of the production parameters and the operating conditions. In this approach, a lower bound for a superheater lifetime is based on some arbitrary safety factor that does not necessarily reflect real lif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Jaeger, H Benhaim, D Tzidony, A Dumai, T Itai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/3295
_version_ 1811342267109081088
author M Jaeger
H Benhaim
D Tzidony
A Dumai
T Itai
author_facet M Jaeger
H Benhaim
D Tzidony
A Dumai
T Itai
author_sort M Jaeger
collection DOAJ
description In the commonly used approach, the lifetime of a superheater is estimated by characteristic values of the production parameters and the operating conditions. In this approach, a lower bound for a superheater lifetime is based on some arbitrary safety factor that does not necessarily reflect real life, where unexpected failures do occur. The method proposed here suggests coping with this reality, by employing a techno-economic probabilistic approach. It comprises the following two models: • A probabilistic time to failure evaluation model that considers the variability of the lifetime determining parameters. • A model to optimise values of technical parameters and operating conditions and to determine a superheater’s optimal replacement policy, based on life cycle cost considerations. The proposed probabilistic time to failure evaluation model can help to identify the most influential parameters for planning for a minimal probability of failure. It is applied to a unique problematic steel T22 superheater of rather specific parameters: corrosion rate, the Larson Miller Parameter (LMP), diameter and wall thickness. Sensitivity analysis has shown that the dominant factor affecting variation in superheater lifetime is the variation in the LMP, while the effect of the other parameters is quite marginal. Decreasing the standard deviation of the LMP (by keeping a more uniform material) lowered the probability of failure. This resulted in a practical recommendation to perform periodical checks of the parameter wall thickness. We also tested the effect of changing the nominal values of these parameters on the lifetime distribution. Hence, we suggest that the selection of the nominal values should be based on life cycle cost considerations; and propose a model to calculate, for any given combination, the average life cycle cost. The latter model, the optimal parameters combination model, optimises the combination of changes in all the superheater’s parameters by minimising the average life cycle cost associated with the superheater. Demonstrating the usefulness of the proposed approach, in a problematic case, suggests that it can be beneficially employed in the more general case whenever the planned lifetime of a design is threatened.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:07:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d985a9c16e924717b5200c2275a23876
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1021-447X
2413-3051
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:07:30Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher University of Cape Town
record_format Article
series Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
spelling doaj.art-d985a9c16e924717b5200c2275a238762022-12-22T02:33:56ZengUniversity of Cape TownJournal of Energy in Southern Africa1021-447X2413-30512017-10-01171667110.17159/2413-3051/2006/v17i1a32953295A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determinationM Jaeger0H Benhaim1D Tzidony2A Dumai3T Itai4Rafael Ltd., Haifa, IsraelIsrael Electric Corporation, Haifa, IsraelRafael Ltd., Haifa, IsraelRafael Ltd., Haifa, IsraelIsrael Electric Corporation, Haifa, IsraelIn the commonly used approach, the lifetime of a superheater is estimated by characteristic values of the production parameters and the operating conditions. In this approach, a lower bound for a superheater lifetime is based on some arbitrary safety factor that does not necessarily reflect real life, where unexpected failures do occur. The method proposed here suggests coping with this reality, by employing a techno-economic probabilistic approach. It comprises the following two models: • A probabilistic time to failure evaluation model that considers the variability of the lifetime determining parameters. • A model to optimise values of technical parameters and operating conditions and to determine a superheater’s optimal replacement policy, based on life cycle cost considerations. The proposed probabilistic time to failure evaluation model can help to identify the most influential parameters for planning for a minimal probability of failure. It is applied to a unique problematic steel T22 superheater of rather specific parameters: corrosion rate, the Larson Miller Parameter (LMP), diameter and wall thickness. Sensitivity analysis has shown that the dominant factor affecting variation in superheater lifetime is the variation in the LMP, while the effect of the other parameters is quite marginal. Decreasing the standard deviation of the LMP (by keeping a more uniform material) lowered the probability of failure. This resulted in a practical recommendation to perform periodical checks of the parameter wall thickness. We also tested the effect of changing the nominal values of these parameters on the lifetime distribution. Hence, we suggest that the selection of the nominal values should be based on life cycle cost considerations; and propose a model to calculate, for any given combination, the average life cycle cost. The latter model, the optimal parameters combination model, optimises the combination of changes in all the superheater’s parameters by minimising the average life cycle cost associated with the superheater. Demonstrating the usefulness of the proposed approach, in a problematic case, suggests that it can be beneficially employed in the more general case whenever the planned lifetime of a design is threatened.https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/3295superheaterlifteime determinationparametersprobalistic approach
spellingShingle M Jaeger
H Benhaim
D Tzidony
A Dumai
T Itai
A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
superheater
lifteime determination
parameters
probalistic approach
title A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
title_full A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
title_fullStr A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
title_full_unstemmed A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
title_short A techno-economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
title_sort techno economic probabilistic approach to superheater lifetime determination
topic superheater
lifteime determination
parameters
probalistic approach
url https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/3295
work_keys_str_mv AT mjaeger atechnoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT hbenhaim atechnoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT dtzidony atechnoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT adumai atechnoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT titai atechnoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT mjaeger technoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT hbenhaim technoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT dtzidony technoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT adumai technoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination
AT titai technoeconomicprobabilisticapproachtosuperheaterlifetimedetermination