Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level

Abstract This study examines the learning patterns of intermediate and advanced Korean learners in the acquisition of causative expressions according to their proficiency and the causative sentence type. We measured their grammatical knowledge using three types of grammaticality judgment tasks (GJTs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyeyun Jeong, Hojung Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-06-01
Series:Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00192-7
_version_ 1797801604106158080
author Hyeyun Jeong
Hojung Kim
author_facet Hyeyun Jeong
Hojung Kim
author_sort Hyeyun Jeong
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study examines the learning patterns of intermediate and advanced Korean learners in the acquisition of causative expressions according to their proficiency and the causative sentence type. We measured their grammatical knowledge using three types of grammaticality judgment tasks (GJTs) and self-paced reading tasks (SPRTs) differing in time limit and modality. We included the GJT A' score and reading time (RT) for SPRTs’ target and spillover regions. The results showed that intermediate learners’ accuracy for morphological and lexical causatives was lower than that for syntactic causatives, while advanced learners’ accuracy for lexical causatives was lower than that for syntactic and morphological causatives. Learners showed a lower accuracy for timed written and aural GJTs than untimed GJT. In SPRT, learners took twice as long to process the target regions as native speakers and even longer to process spillover regions. Advanced learners had a longer RT. Learners had a low correct rate for causative suffix substitution and adjectival root questions, substitution questions on causative markers, and substitution questions on causee case postpositions in morphological, syntactic, and lexical causatives. Learners showed confusion with active sentences in lexical causatives. This study has implications for understanding causative expression acquisition for learners’ proficiency levels.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:52:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d98a5acbe8424921827c59f9070223ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2363-5169
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:52:33Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
spelling doaj.art-d98a5acbe8424921827c59f9070223ba2023-06-18T11:08:19ZengSpringerOpenAsian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education2363-51692023-06-018112410.1186/s40862-023-00192-7Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency levelHyeyun Jeong0Hojung Kim1Department of Korean Language Education, Seoul National UniversityDepartment of Korean Language Education, Seoul National UniversityAbstract This study examines the learning patterns of intermediate and advanced Korean learners in the acquisition of causative expressions according to their proficiency and the causative sentence type. We measured their grammatical knowledge using three types of grammaticality judgment tasks (GJTs) and self-paced reading tasks (SPRTs) differing in time limit and modality. We included the GJT A' score and reading time (RT) for SPRTs’ target and spillover regions. The results showed that intermediate learners’ accuracy for morphological and lexical causatives was lower than that for syntactic causatives, while advanced learners’ accuracy for lexical causatives was lower than that for syntactic and morphological causatives. Learners showed a lower accuracy for timed written and aural GJTs than untimed GJT. In SPRT, learners took twice as long to process the target regions as native speakers and even longer to process spillover regions. Advanced learners had a longer RT. Learners had a low correct rate for causative suffix substitution and adjectival root questions, substitution questions on causative markers, and substitution questions on causee case postpositions in morphological, syntactic, and lexical causatives. Learners showed confusion with active sentences in lexical causatives. This study has implications for understanding causative expression acquisition for learners’ proficiency levels.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00192-7Second language acquisitionCausative voiceSelf-paced reading taskGrammaticality judgment taskGrammatical knowledgeExplicit knowledge
spellingShingle Hyeyun Jeong
Hojung Kim
Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Second language acquisition
Causative voice
Self-paced reading task
Grammaticality judgment task
Grammatical knowledge
Explicit knowledge
title Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level
title_full Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level
title_fullStr Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level
title_short Differences in Korean learners’ acquisition of causative expressions: focus on learners’ proficiency level
title_sort differences in korean learners acquisition of causative expressions focus on learners proficiency level
topic Second language acquisition
Causative voice
Self-paced reading task
Grammaticality judgment task
Grammatical knowledge
Explicit knowledge
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00192-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hyeyunjeong differencesinkoreanlearnersacquisitionofcausativeexpressionsfocusonlearnersproficiencylevel
AT hojungkim differencesinkoreanlearnersacquisitionofcausativeexpressionsfocusonlearnersproficiencylevel