Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation

Abstract To date, evidence on optimal anticoagulant options in patients with AF who concurrently have active cancer remains elusive. To describe anticoagulant patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with a concomitant diagnosis of AF and cancer. Data were obtained from the University of Utah a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha, Alexandre H. Watanabe, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Leenhapong Navaravong, Daniel M. Witt, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38071-3
_version_ 1797784659202932736
author Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha
Alexandre H. Watanabe
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Leenhapong Navaravong
Daniel M. Witt
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
author_facet Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha
Alexandre H. Watanabe
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Leenhapong Navaravong
Daniel M. Witt
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
author_sort Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To date, evidence on optimal anticoagulant options in patients with AF who concurrently have active cancer remains elusive. To describe anticoagulant patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with a concomitant diagnosis of AF and cancer. Data were obtained from the University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) Hospitals. Patients were included if they had diagnosis of AF and cancer. Outcome was type and pattern of anticoagulant. Clinical outcomes were stroke, bleeding and all-cause mortality. From October 1999 to December 2020, there were 566 AF patients who concurrently had active cancer. Mean age ± standard deviation was 76.2 ± 10.7 and 57.6% were males. Comparing to warfarin, patients who received direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) were associated with similar risk of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2–2.7, P = 0.67). On contrary, those who received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) were associated with significantly higher risk of stroke comparing to warfarin (aHR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0–5.6, P = 0.04). Comparing to warfarin, DOACs and LMWH was associated with similar risk of overall bleeding with aHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7–1.6, P = 0.73) and aHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.6–1.7, P = 0.83), respectively. Patients who received LMWH but not DOACs were associated with increased risk of death as compared to warfarin, aHR 4.5 (95% CI 2.8–7.2, P < 0.001) and 1.2 (95% CI 0.7–2.2, P = 0.47). In patients with active cancer and AF, LMWH, compared to warfarin, was associated with an increased risk of stroke and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, DOACs was associated with similar risk of stroke, bleeding and death as compared to warfarin.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:43:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9a26f68eccf487e85127d9821f026ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:43:03Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-d9a26f68eccf487e85127d9821f026ef2023-07-09T11:12:18ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-07-011311810.1038/s41598-023-38071-3Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillationChatree Chai-Adisaksopha0Alexandre H. Watanabe1Piyameth Dilokthornsakul2Leenhapong Navaravong3Daniel M. Witt4Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk5Department of Internal Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, University of UtahCenter for Medical and Health Technology Assessment (CM-HTA), Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai UniversityDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of UtahDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, University of UtahDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, University of UtahAbstract To date, evidence on optimal anticoagulant options in patients with AF who concurrently have active cancer remains elusive. To describe anticoagulant patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with a concomitant diagnosis of AF and cancer. Data were obtained from the University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) Hospitals. Patients were included if they had diagnosis of AF and cancer. Outcome was type and pattern of anticoagulant. Clinical outcomes were stroke, bleeding and all-cause mortality. From October 1999 to December 2020, there were 566 AF patients who concurrently had active cancer. Mean age ± standard deviation was 76.2 ± 10.7 and 57.6% were males. Comparing to warfarin, patients who received direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) were associated with similar risk of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2–2.7, P = 0.67). On contrary, those who received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) were associated with significantly higher risk of stroke comparing to warfarin (aHR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0–5.6, P = 0.04). Comparing to warfarin, DOACs and LMWH was associated with similar risk of overall bleeding with aHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7–1.6, P = 0.73) and aHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.6–1.7, P = 0.83), respectively. Patients who received LMWH but not DOACs were associated with increased risk of death as compared to warfarin, aHR 4.5 (95% CI 2.8–7.2, P < 0.001) and 1.2 (95% CI 0.7–2.2, P = 0.47). In patients with active cancer and AF, LMWH, compared to warfarin, was associated with an increased risk of stroke and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, DOACs was associated with similar risk of stroke, bleeding and death as compared to warfarin.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38071-3
spellingShingle Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha
Alexandre H. Watanabe
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Leenhapong Navaravong
Daniel M. Witt
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
Scientific Reports
title Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
title_full Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
title_short Impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
title_sort impact of type of anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in cancer patients who had atrial fibrillation
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38071-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chatreechaiadisaksopha impactoftypeofanticoagulantonclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientswhohadatrialfibrillation
AT alexandrehwatanabe impactoftypeofanticoagulantonclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientswhohadatrialfibrillation
AT piyamethdilokthornsakul impactoftypeofanticoagulantonclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientswhohadatrialfibrillation
AT leenhapongnavaravong impactoftypeofanticoagulantonclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientswhohadatrialfibrillation
AT danielmwitt impactoftypeofanticoagulantonclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientswhohadatrialfibrillation
AT nathornchaiyakunapruk impactoftypeofanticoagulantonclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientswhohadatrialfibrillation