Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage

Abstract Background Articular cartilage is known to be a viscoelastic material, however little research has explored the impact of cartilage water content and bone density on its viscoelasticity. This study aimed to isolate subchondral bone density and hydration of articular cartilage and analyse th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph P. Crolla, Bernard M. Lawless, Anna A. Cederlund, Richard M. Aspden, Daniel M. Espino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-03-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0
_version_ 1819294561793474560
author Joseph P. Crolla
Bernard M. Lawless
Anna A. Cederlund
Richard M. Aspden
Daniel M. Espino
author_facet Joseph P. Crolla
Bernard M. Lawless
Anna A. Cederlund
Richard M. Aspden
Daniel M. Espino
author_sort Joseph P. Crolla
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Articular cartilage is known to be a viscoelastic material, however little research has explored the impact of cartilage water content and bone density on its viscoelasticity. This study aimed to isolate subchondral bone density and hydration of articular cartilage and analyse their effects on the viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage. Methods Dynamic mechanical analysis was used to test samples at frequencies of 1, 8, 12, 29, 49, 71, and 88 Hz. Synthetic bone material with densities of 663.7 kg/m3 and 156.8 kg/m3 were used to mimic the bone mineral density (BMD). Dehydration occurred in a stepwise manner at relative humidity (RH) levels of 100%, 30%, and 1%. These relative humidity levels led to water contents of approximately 76%, 8.5%, and ≈ 0% by mass, respectively. Results Samples from eight bovine femoral heads were tested under a sinusoidal load. Storage stiffness was lower on the lower substrate density. Storage stiffness, though, increased as cartilage samples were dehydrated from a water content of 76% to 8.5%; decreasing again as the water content was further reduced. Loss stiffness was lower on a lower density substrate and decreased as the water content decreased. Conclusions In conclusions, a decrease in hydration decreases the loss stiffness, but a non-linear relationship between hydration and storage stiffness may exist. Additionally, higher BMD values led to greater storage and loss stiffnesses.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T04:28:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9ae0417c55a410d8931c5f9d5f48b45
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T04:28:17Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-d9ae0417c55a410d8931c5f9d5f48b452022-12-21T17:15:30ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742022-03-0123111110.1186/s12891-022-05169-0Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilageJoseph P. Crolla0Bernard M. Lawless1Anna A. Cederlund2Richard M. Aspden3Daniel M. Espino4Deptment of Mechanical Engineering, University of BirminghamDeptment of Mechanical Engineering, University of BirminghamCentre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of AberdeenCentre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of AberdeenDeptment of Mechanical Engineering, University of BirminghamAbstract Background Articular cartilage is known to be a viscoelastic material, however little research has explored the impact of cartilage water content and bone density on its viscoelasticity. This study aimed to isolate subchondral bone density and hydration of articular cartilage and analyse their effects on the viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage. Methods Dynamic mechanical analysis was used to test samples at frequencies of 1, 8, 12, 29, 49, 71, and 88 Hz. Synthetic bone material with densities of 663.7 kg/m3 and 156.8 kg/m3 were used to mimic the bone mineral density (BMD). Dehydration occurred in a stepwise manner at relative humidity (RH) levels of 100%, 30%, and 1%. These relative humidity levels led to water contents of approximately 76%, 8.5%, and ≈ 0% by mass, respectively. Results Samples from eight bovine femoral heads were tested under a sinusoidal load. Storage stiffness was lower on the lower substrate density. Storage stiffness, though, increased as cartilage samples were dehydrated from a water content of 76% to 8.5%; decreasing again as the water content was further reduced. Loss stiffness was lower on a lower density substrate and decreased as the water content decreased. Conclusions In conclusions, a decrease in hydration decreases the loss stiffness, but a non-linear relationship between hydration and storage stiffness may exist. Additionally, higher BMD values led to greater storage and loss stiffnesses.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0Articular cartilageBone densityHydrationLossStorageViscoelasticity
spellingShingle Joseph P. Crolla
Bernard M. Lawless
Anna A. Cederlund
Richard M. Aspden
Daniel M. Espino
Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Articular cartilage
Bone density
Hydration
Loss
Storage
Viscoelasticity
title Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_full Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_fullStr Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_short Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_sort analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
topic Articular cartilage
Bone density
Hydration
Loss
Storage
Viscoelasticity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0
work_keys_str_mv AT josephpcrolla analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT bernardmlawless analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT annaacederlund analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT richardmaspden analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT danielmespino analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage