Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.

<h4>Background</h4>It is unclear if a local audit would be useful in providing guidance on how to improve local practice of empiric antibiotic therapy. We performed an audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia to evaluate the proportion and risk factors for inadequate empiric antibiotic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony D Bai, Neal Irfan, Cheryl Main, Philippe El-Helou, Dominik Mertz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248817
_version_ 1798032107886346240
author Anthony D Bai
Neal Irfan
Cheryl Main
Philippe El-Helou
Dominik Mertz
author_facet Anthony D Bai
Neal Irfan
Cheryl Main
Philippe El-Helou
Dominik Mertz
author_sort Anthony D Bai
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>It is unclear if a local audit would be useful in providing guidance on how to improve local practice of empiric antibiotic therapy. We performed an audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia to evaluate the proportion and risk factors for inadequate empiric antibiotic coverage.<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective cohort study included patients with positive blood cultures across 3 hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada during October of 2019. Antibiotic therapy was considered empiric if it was administered within 24 hours after blood culture collection. Adequate coverage was defined as when the isolate from blood culture was tested to be susceptible to the empiric antibiotic. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to predict inadequate empiric coverage. Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical pathway based on patient risk factors was compared to clinician's decision in predicting which bacteria to empirically cover.<h4>Results</h4>Of 201 bacteremia cases, empiric coverage was inadequate in 56 (27.9%) cases. Risk factors for inadequate empiric coverage included unknown source at initiation of antibiotic therapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.76 95% CI 1.27-6.01, P = 0.010) and prior antibiotic therapy within 90 days (aOR of 2.46 95% CI 1.30-4.74, P = 0.006). A clinical pathway that considered community-associated infection as low risk for Pseudomonas was better at ruling out Pseudomonas bacteremia with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95% CI 0.03-1.10) compared to clinician's decision with negative likelihood ratio of 0.34 (95% CI 0.10-1.22).<h4>Conclusions</h4>An audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia is feasible and may provide useful feedback on how to locally improve empiric antibiotic therapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:07:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9b5c49616d84874b9d9acac8ccf33b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:07:31Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d9b5c49616d84874b9d9acac8ccf33b02022-12-22T04:05:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024881710.1371/journal.pone.0248817Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.Anthony D BaiNeal IrfanCheryl MainPhilippe El-HelouDominik Mertz<h4>Background</h4>It is unclear if a local audit would be useful in providing guidance on how to improve local practice of empiric antibiotic therapy. We performed an audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia to evaluate the proportion and risk factors for inadequate empiric antibiotic coverage.<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective cohort study included patients with positive blood cultures across 3 hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada during October of 2019. Antibiotic therapy was considered empiric if it was administered within 24 hours after blood culture collection. Adequate coverage was defined as when the isolate from blood culture was tested to be susceptible to the empiric antibiotic. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to predict inadequate empiric coverage. Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical pathway based on patient risk factors was compared to clinician's decision in predicting which bacteria to empirically cover.<h4>Results</h4>Of 201 bacteremia cases, empiric coverage was inadequate in 56 (27.9%) cases. Risk factors for inadequate empiric coverage included unknown source at initiation of antibiotic therapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.76 95% CI 1.27-6.01, P = 0.010) and prior antibiotic therapy within 90 days (aOR of 2.46 95% CI 1.30-4.74, P = 0.006). A clinical pathway that considered community-associated infection as low risk for Pseudomonas was better at ruling out Pseudomonas bacteremia with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95% CI 0.03-1.10) compared to clinician's decision with negative likelihood ratio of 0.34 (95% CI 0.10-1.22).<h4>Conclusions</h4>An audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia is feasible and may provide useful feedback on how to locally improve empiric antibiotic therapy.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248817
spellingShingle Anthony D Bai
Neal Irfan
Cheryl Main
Philippe El-Helou
Dominik Mertz
Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.
PLoS ONE
title Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.
title_full Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.
title_fullStr Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.
title_full_unstemmed Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.
title_short Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.
title_sort local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia a retrospective cohort study
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248817
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonydbai localauditofempiricantibiotictherapyinbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nealirfan localauditofempiricantibiotictherapyinbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cherylmain localauditofempiricantibiotictherapyinbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT philippeelhelou localauditofempiricantibiotictherapyinbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dominikmertz localauditofempiricantibiotictherapyinbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy